Jump to content

JBJ

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    5113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JBJ

  1. If true, it's not just evidence that this committee is dumb, this is plain corruption.
  2. Oregon JMU spread is going wild.
  3. Which of those games should I watch to convince me ND is a playoff team?
  4. Would we be favored over all the first-round teams? Oregon, maybe not?
  5. We already seen this game this year and they didn't.
  6. Miami has a run defense.
  7. They ended up putting the two that have the worst losses in. Florida doesn't matter.
  8. Drumrolll......
  9. Psychology of colors is messing with the eye test.
  10. Georgia at 3 is a surprise.
  11. Bama in is apparently already leaked.
  12. Neither team has a game that you can tell a friend to go watch to show that they are a top 10 team.
  13. Yes. All BCS models did. You could only consider W-L, no scores and no stats, which just isn't enough.
  14. They either need to give the committee a stricter structure or just use computer models. The weekly rankings are supposed to give a good sense of where you stand, but they've moved idle teams and teams without a notable outcome in pretty much every week this year. No matter whether you think we are done or not, we are open in sportsbooks, which means enough people think idle Texas could be swapped with another idle team that it is a betting prop. The big issue with computer models is that it is really hard to exclude "run up the score" stats in them and have good output. And most modelers don't really understand football. They just have generic modified Elo's or stat regression's that they could apply to any sport or game. These aren't bad, but they aren't good either. We all see the headscratchers that Sagarin puts out at times. And his BCS-qualified model was even worse.
  15. The team that deserved the spot more wasn't talked about at all though (Ole Miss).
  16. One hour away
  17. If the committee want to be consistent, it is either Bama and Texas or Notre Dame and Vandy. SOR and elite wins vs handling business and good losses. I realize that consistency is not a requirement.
  18. I had a nightmare that we've seen Arch play his last game in a Texas uniform.
  19. Good catch USC was by 10. I think the point still stands, but USC is a bit better than Pitt.
  20. Notre Dame beat Pitt by 10 points in the last relevant game of their year. Texas beat aggy by 10 in our last game. One is clearly better than other.
  21. Now do the other bubble teams, lol.
  22. In every metric the CFP is supposed to look at: SOR: Texas > Bama > Notre Dame > Miami SOS: Texas > Bama > Notre Dame > Miami Quality of losses: Notre Dame > Texas > Bama > Miami Quality of wins: Texas > Bama > Miami > Notre Dame
  23. North of 285, so I'm solidly suburbia. If the CCGs don't matter, they become irrelevant.
  24. Atlanta is kinda a Bama town tbh. The way Dallas has more OU people. I hardly see any UGA fans where I live. It's all Bama and GT.
  25. They need Texas as a buffer between Notre Dame and Miami.
×
×
  • Create New...