Jump to content

DanTheHorn

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    3904
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DanTheHorn

  1. Just catching up, so the Taxi King was flipped on a state charge. Cohen if implicated will not have cover from Trump. Well as long as these prosecutors do not screw it up. Recently I watched a documentary in which one guy got caught red handed. The guy flipped and turned over two others. Well the guy that flipped lives in Israel and the other two never went to jail. The guy that flipped was Russian and basically claims his was able to flip in a way in which everyone went away basically scot-free. Damn Russians.

  2. Looked at criticism regarding Mexico's list and the consensus seems to be Rodolfo Pizzaro and Gallito should not have been left out. Gio will always be criticized in Mexico. Even after he scored the goal against the Netherlands in the last world cup he was taken out only to have Aquino come in a give up the goal that tied the game.

    All in all the preliminary list seems fine to me.

  3. 3 hours ago, selvahorn said:

     

     

    So masterful they can't even complete 60% of their passes. Big time winning QBs complete at least 62% of their passes the last time I checked which was years ago.  Vince completed 61.8% of his passes over his career and 65% his final year. Colt completed 70% of his passes over his career.

    The time I looked was somewhere between 2000 and 2004 trying to figure out what it took to be a good quarterback. I checked over three years in the NFL and most guys below 62% had losing records while most guys over 62% had winning records. Seems small but at least with the data I checked 1% point made a huge difference. So if our guys are below 62% I figure we are going to lose a few games due to completion percentage.

    • Fuck You 3
  4. 30 minutes ago, sheeeit said:

    It sort of depends on your definition of "his attorney".  If a guy who never sent you a bill and that you never paid and has never represented you in any civil or criminal proceeding is considered "your lawyer" then maybe so.  But only maybe, I am not sure it is relevant for a talking head radio show guy.  Can no one in journalism not have sources that they are friendly with?

    People ask the lawyers on here to answer legal questions all of the time.  Does that make them "your lawyer"?

    Well that means you believe Hannity. The court and Cohen's attorney thought there was an attorney client relationship of some sort between the two. So I will go with the court and attorneys trying to fight from the name coming out. Remember no money has to change hands for a attorney client relationship to be established. The attorney has to establish it has and that is it.

  5. 4 minutes ago, sheeeit said:

    I dont think I have ever seen hannity's tv show and have heard his radio gig a few times and, like pretty much everyone else, it was a total beating to listen to.  

    I am having a hard time understanding the hoopla regarding transparency.  Did Hannity have cohen on his show a bunch and not tell people he was Trump's lawyer?  is it a problem that he may have used Cohen as a "source"?  Don't all media/journalists have sources that they do not disclose?  Are people making the jump to the conclusion that if hannnity knows cohen and used him for legal purposes that he, Hannity, can no longer have any opinions on Trump because cohen is trumps attorney?  Obviously it seems many, many people in the media have "sources" within the FBI and inside Mueller's team because they keep attributing stories to them.  Are they supposed to disclose them if they know them personally or have some sort of connection to them?  

    I do not get the deep state analogy.  Isnt the deep state stuff supposedly that people on the inside that have the ability to actually have a direct effect on things?  people that are somehow directly involved in investigations and so forth.  Hannity is just a blow hard tv and radio guy.  How can he actually affect anything regarding any of the investigations?  Do we think Mueller is affected in any way by what Hannity says?  

    As for why Hannity kept the relationship secret the only answer you need is what is going on right now.  

    Obviously this is a big deal if Hannity used Cohen to cover something up.   

     

    Cohen a source no need to disclose relationship. Cohen happens to be your attorney. You must disclose. You can still have opinions on Cohen, Trump and everything else after disclosure.

  6. 5 hours ago, Pods said:

    I don't get the sense that Hannity is a sex payoff like the others. Maybe it is, but it seems different for some reason based on reactions.

    I think it's more likely that this is a crude attempt to get attorney-client privilege between Cohen and Hannity to prevent investigators finding out something much worse. My guess is that this involves communications between Wikileaks/Assange or coordination on the emails/DNC hack release. 

    What do you mean? Hannity's first thought was to say that he has not been represented by Cohen in regards to a Third Party. Sure sounds like this guy.

    giphy+%25284%2529.gif

    Why not both?

  7. Just heard about the Cohen and Hannity relationship. First thing I thought is Hannity was in need of NDA. From reading the thread others had the same thought. What would just be unreal is if both Trump and Hannity used the same muscle and both get caught.

  8. 22 hours ago, satyanash said:

     

     

     

    Oh we know what Herman will choose and it has nothing to do with the difference. My impression is Herman likes to run his QBs period. That is why his QBs get hurt at every place he has been as far as I know. People that know more than me may disagree and I would like to hear their opnion.

  9. 48 minutes ago, po elvis said:

    there are 4 black people right there in your streetview.

    since everyone is speculating, i will speculate. the starbucks had been pretty busy. these guys were sitting there taking up two tables for 30 minutes without ordering. they aren't on laptops or anything, just sitting there. if they were white, they would have been asked to order or leave and they would have just left. but since they are black, they get asked the same thing and they claim it is because they are black. cops have to be called. because they won't leave.

    Because black folks put up with a lot of shit through out life. At some point they just can't see the same act as fair. You must be a white dude that does not get it. I am Hispanic so I do not get it as bad but when I was I UT some white girl turned her glove in at the intramural ahead of me and asked if she could get a discount if she was a minority. You know how many discounts minorities get for being a minority. ZERO. Listen to this type shit and get the looks all your life and then tell me if you would perceived being asked to leave as something that just everyone has happen to them.

    • Like 2
  10. 2 hours ago, C-Man said:

    Correct. Football teams are "okay" with players moonlighting as baseball players from time to time but that is a one-way street. The minute he signs a MLB contract they ain't lettin' him put on the pads to play big-boy football no fucking chance in hell.

    Didn't Ricky have a contract?

  11. 7 minutes ago, longhornmatt said:

    Something tells me Trump wouldn’t be the most reliable child support payor.  There’s probably a poor Drumpfy looking young guy working at a convenience store in the Bronx as we speak patiently waiting for that gold his daddy promised to finally come, ala Billy and April.

    He probably more like Fat Amy's dad looking to get a free stuff at the convenience store.

×
×
  • Create New...