-
Posts
21076 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by InkaUtexas
-
-
Well here we go.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Aviation Administration announced Wednesday that it will reduce air traffic by 10% across 40 “high-volume” markets beginning Friday morning to maintain safety during the ongoing government shutdown.
The agency is confronting staffing shortages caused by air traffic controllers, who are working unpaid, with some calling out of work during the shutdown, resulting in delays across the country.
FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said the agency is not going to wait for a problem to act, saying the shutdown is causing staffing pressures and “we can’t ignore it.”
Bedford and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said they will meet later Wednesday with airline leaders to figure out how to safely implement the reduction.
https://apnews.com/article/government-shutdown-airlines-faa-e39c423facec2b0dcc2544af48de0fa1
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
You know you just want to be their translator.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
First NTSB Brief on CNN.
-
1 minute ago, Gatorubet said:
You have to get through the host intro screeching about CLE credit, but the oral argument itself is on this YouTube link for whoever wants to listen to the damn thing and make their own opinions about oral argument.
I’m home with the flu, so I’ll be listening to this thing and trying to stay awake. Twice is entirely correct that you can’t always tell the decision from the oral argument (remember VAPA roosterIng around claiming victory after the fifth circuit oral argument, only to be served his crow). judges/justices will often toss softballs to the side they don’t favor in order to see if they come up with anything else to change their mind, even though at first blush they favor the opposing side.
OTOH, some statements or admissions on legal doctrine during oral argument are so seemingly conclusive that it won’t be walked back during the opinion writing process. For example, in a statute of limitations case discussing whether you filed your lawsuit on time, an appellate judge might ask you a question that seems to support that you were not aware of the need to sue yet, only to find that judge later ruling against you. But if that same judge states in oral argument that “it looks clear that the statute of limitation had passed three months before you filed”, you can probably take that judge’s opinion to the bank as ultimately being against your client.
tl:dr. I’m currently testing the theory that cannabis will cure the flu, and will be listening to the argument. Feel free to add your tea leaves thoughts
Thanks for posting. I would add brandy and tea with the cannabis. It is an old trick.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
obamaphone v2
TrumpPhones. Tied to your voting records.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
absolutely. walmart will start paying you to shop there. or something
iphone upgrades for all.
-
Does the dude in the Texas Jersey still have eligibility? Make him the 12th man vs. aggy and tell him he gets some pay per sack.
-
3
-
-
And then... Yeah, no reason to have award ceremonies that are announced.
-
1
-
7
-
-
-
Fuckers.
-
2
-
3
-
-
13 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
lemme get my family outta there first and then I accept
PR has better baseball. So that is a win for the US.
-
2
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:
Yeah but he probably won't be the last in the NYFD or NYPD to do some dramatic bitchy shit like this.
Gonna be the fire marshall at MaL. Or in charge of the Fed wilderness fire fighting program.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:
He’s built like a candy apple.
Why do you hate Candy Apples?
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, NAVY said:
Might be the first time standing on grass
Nah, he golfs. Just look at his build.
-
2
-
-
Students for Nader Boyz...
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
OK, this is bad ass. Hunting in tandems.
-
8
-
2
-
Just now, Anastasis said:
I have never welched on a bet here, and I have been very generous in terms of not requiring proof of payment on the ones the went my way.
Got ya. To be fair. Most people I interact with are in tune with politics at the national level. Fucking with you man. Jeez....
-
Just now, Gil Bang said:
he's our own Mike Johnson
The Helo of the politics threads.
-
3
-
1
-
-
Just now, Anastasis said:
Its not about your curated circle or mine. I assume that we can both circulate in public. Same wager offered...
I can ask the first ten people I see tomorrow if they voted today, and how many of them are interesting the NYC Mayor race and I would wager any amount you wish on under with a o/u line set at 1.5.
You are a libertarian. You would not pay up.
-
6
-
1
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Just now, Anastasis said:It is not that hard. You don't need to strawmen. Simply put, the vast majority of America didn't even know democracy was happening today.
Everyone in my circle did. Maybe hang out with better citizens. Just saying.
-
11
-
1
-
13 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
with it should face relentless litigation.You just looking for a payout Councillor.
-
1
-
2
-
-
Newsom going national.
-
1 minute ago, Pancho said:
New catchphrase just dropped via Mamdani:
TURN THE VOLUME UP
And going straight after Trump.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
12
-
4
-
1
UT Language Website Fundraiser
in Daily Texan
Posted
Yeah, but is probably an aggy.