Jump to content

Anastasis

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    31467
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Anastasis

  1. Last presentation, than should wrap up the votes I think. All of the CDC presenters and SMEs, particularly those from yesterday, have been impressive and extremely well prepared.
  2. That's just another strawman, but hilarious is the context of the real back bending the same posters did here to defend the prior administrations totally absurd ph strategy and politicalization of the CDC/FDA.
  3. The naturopath public commenter called out the AI citation in the deck, lol.
  4. That part was pretty quality shit talking.
  5. Yeah, heard that one. Meissner is the clearest no and strong opposition. That one will go either 4-3 or 5-2 I think.
  6. Good. Maybe you will share thoughts or summaries of the actual exchanges taking place at some point. Or just post another arstechnica link, whatever.
  7. The thimerosal lady that used AI to produce at least some of her slides is on now.
  8. And if you think that anything in the post you quoted is a conspiracy theory, you need help dude. You're on the "bang on the table and yell like hell" stage.
  9. Speaking of deep dive, between you and me, I am the one that is watching the actual meeting you fucking clown. I am sorry if it hurts your feels what happened with the lab leak dialogue. But I guess quote me another arstechnica editorial.
  10. Here's the stream for today, they are talking flu shit right now. https://www.youtube.com/live/z-16fImZoEc Committee endorsed monoclonal ab in infants whose mother's are not RSV vaccinated. 5-2 vote. Committee endorsed updating VFC resolution to include above. 7-0 vote.
  11. Stop @ing me with an arstechnica piece and strawmanning. I listened to most of meeting in teh background yesterday and will do so today. I don't need your selected editorials. I do find it funny that you are now tuning into the political bullshit surrounding the CDC though. I think a lot of the RFK blowback wrt vaccine could have been avoided if people like you actually paid attention to the science instead of pushing mandates and public health initiatives based absurd immunology and the feeling that the best lever to pull was threatening people with their jobs. COVID was a mess and broke a lot of brains on this particular topic. And now your view on the science are hopelessly intertwined with politics. I remember the threads on the old board where there were fairly in-depth exchanges about things like the vaccine schedule, hep b at birth, timing of things like MMR for maximum effectiveness, etc. Posters here were generally less politically brain damaged back then and didn't act like clowns like you are doing. I also recall the reactions on the political board when Perry mandated the Gardasil thing for young girls. What a world, if you pay attention long enough.
  12. First Q/A session streaming now. Basically methodology discussions at this point around how VE estimates are influenced by different aspects of study designs re: the observational data presented. eta: Safety section Q/A now, Malone chimes in for first time. First point is around transparency regarding details of the safety analyses that have been conducted. Reasonable request I guess, but pretty much a throw away. Second is a question related to the lot to lot variability and whether any of the safety analyses have assessed any relationship. Another series of questions from him later on expanding the safety surveillance to include immunological implications and assessment of longer-term effects. Malones line of questioning is hard to follow. The MIT guy's as well. Discussion was all handled very well by the CDC reps and their SMEs. eta2; COVID section over now. No votes scheduled.
  13. It's all in the materials that I posted on last page. Flu strain selection took place months ago. Regarding COVID, looks like some CDC pushback on the decision to can the recommendation for pregnant women. Generally the safety and effectiveness data are well laid out. Some interesting data in the backup slides on diminished returns in terms of antibody production based on number of prior combined infections/vaccinations.
  14. I posted a link about a novel anti-viral to the covid influenza black death thread. You vomit on your shoes immediately and reflexively. People can read the thread for themselves.
  15. You should try reading the article because that is not what it says at all.
  16. Agree. Tomorrow ACIP will likely recommend expanded access to Flublock, a recombinant flu vaccine.
  17. What the fuck are you talking about? Just clowning.
  18. Interesting novel therapeutic, pan-flu antiviral, one dose last 28 weeks, covers N5H1, not dependent on strain selection, very high effectiveness in phase 2. https://www.cidara.com/news/cidara-therapeutics-announces-positive-topline-results-from-its-phase-2b-navigate-trial-evaluating-cd388-a-non-vaccine-preventative-of-seasonal-influenza/
  19. Here are the pre-posted meeting materials. https://www.cdc.gov/acip/meetings/presentation-slides-june-25-26-2025.html
  20. It's not even that complicated.
  21. And Palestinians still get shot up waiting in lines for humanitarian aid distribution.
  22. They are going to put a vote on thimerosal containing flu vaccines to the committee. I don't have a particularly strong opinion one way or the other on that one. It was removed from most childhood vaccines on the market years ago. I don't recall any crying and lashing out on these boards about it when the FDA did that though. The only remaining formulations that contain thimerosal are primarily flu shot MDVs, which make up like a single digits in terms of flu shots used in the US. It's a total non-issue imo.
  23. What am I gonna do with this stock pile of gummies now?
  24. Nah. He did. He was deflecting while they were shoving big sticks up kids asses in detention.
  25. Not quite the flex you think it is. Aim higher in life.
×
×
  • Create New...