Jump to content

Rollo Tomassi

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rollo Tomassi

  1. 3 minutes ago, texasstrong12 said:

    Would be a major steal if it happens, but I have my doubts. A lot of people had him projected in the top 4 rounds. 

     

    Isn't that the reason he's likely to sign w/ Texas?  The bonus is about $125K in this round, as opposed to whatever he would have received in the 4th round.  If he goes to college, he can increase his value tremendously.

  2. This seems to be a very hotly debated topic across the country.  There are several lawsuits around the state addressing various issues surrounding STRs -- One in Austin that claims that the regulations the city has in place are unconstitutional because they treat short-term renters (less than 30 days) differently than they treat long-term renters.

    The Texas Supreme Court recently rendered an opinion that short-term renters' use of the property is residential in nature, and not commercial.  This article discusses that opinion and the possible impact on city ordinances, like Austin.

    https://www.texastribune.org/2018/05/25/airbnb-homeaway-texas-supreme-court-ken-paxton-austin-ordinance/

    Texas Supreme Court sides with short-term renters, likely bolstering state’s fight against Austin’s ordinance

    by Emma Platoff May 25, 201811 AM

     

     

    Air_BnB_Mariana.jpg

    Homes on Garden Street in Austin on Feb. 24, 2017. Shelby Knowles for The Texas Tribune

     

    The Texas Supreme Court has sided with short-term renters, delivering a win to Texas homeowners who hope to take advantage of websites like Airbnb and HomeAway, and likely bolstering a separate, ongoing case against the City of Austin’s short-term rental ordinance.

    Kenneth Tarr bought a home near San Antonio in 2012, but when his employer transferred him to Houston two years later, he began to rent it out on a short-term basis. His homeowners’ association soon took issue with that, telling him that the practice violated his deed restrictions, which said his home had to be used “solely for residential purposes.”

    Tarr and his lawyers argued that short-term rentals did constitute a residential purpose: Visitors ate, slept and entertained themselves as anyone would at home. The homeowners’ association countered that Tarr’s property operated more like a hotel than a home, meaning it was primarily serving a commercial purpose.

    “So long as the occupants to whom Tarr rents his single-family residence use the home for a ‘residential purpose,’ no matter how short-lived, neither their on-property use nor Tarr’s off- property use violates the restrictive covenants in the Timberwood deeds,” Justice Jeff Brown wrote Friday for a unanimous court.

    Patrick Sutton, Tarr’s lawyer, said Friday’s ruling will apply to homeowners in homeowners associations across the state, most of whom operate under similar deed restrictions — and its impacts may even reach further than that.

    “This is about as strong of a property rights type opinion as one can imagine,” Sutton said. “It is broadly applicable to [city] ordinances and to deed restrictions — it tells us what nine justices on this current court think about people using their land.”

    Separate from deed restrictions, there are also local ordinances on short-term rentals in place in more than a dozen Texas cities. While Friday’s ruling doesn’t directly concern those restrictions, the strong attention it gives to property rights and the court's unanimous support for it may well bolster the case of a group of short-term renters and guests who have sued the city of Austin, alleging that its short-term rental ordinance, one of the state’s oldest and strictest, unconstitutionally infringes on their rights.

    In that high-profile case — which has drawn the support of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton — a small group of plaintiffs, represented by the Texas Public Policy Foundation, argue that by restricting short-term rentals, the City of Austin prevents homeowners from using their property as they see fit, and treats short-term renters differently than it treats long-term renters.

    Rob Henneke, a TPPF lawyer representing those plaintiffs, said Friday that “the Texas Supreme Court got it right.”

    “This is a decision affirming private property rights,” he said, noting that the reasoning in the case supports his argument against Austin’s ordinance in several major ways.  

    In overruling a lower court’s previous decision on Tarr’s case, the ruling removes much of the legal grounding for the City of Austin’s argument, he said. A lawyer for the city did not immediately return a request for comment. The ruling also affirms a separate short-term rental decision that supports TPPF’s side, Henneke said.

    The decision marks the high court’s first major ruling on this issue at a time when short-term rentals — and the restrictions on them — are being litigated across the state. While short-term rentals have long been a reality, especially in vacation destinations, their spike in popularity thanks to web platforms like HomeAway and Airbnb has exposed holes and discrepancies in the laws that regulate them, ripening the issue for litigation across the state.

    Short-term rentals have also emerged as yet another local control issue in a state where Republican state leaders have moved more aggressively in recent years to override local decisions made by Democratic-dominated city councils. As that war proceeds, Friday’s decision marks a major victory for the state.

  3. On 5/1/2018 at 9:02 PM, ChickenSandwich said:

    Chili’s at 183 and Burnet has made some great changes to their menu. Really stepped up food game. 

    Service is always full of flair, and if there is a better meal than fajita shooters in this town, well fuck me. 

    This holds a special place in my heart....I waited tables there 1986-1990.  Good times.

    • Like 1
  4. 10 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

    I read an interview with him about it and the gist was he was tired of fighting poorly made guitars.  Which was funny, because I really reading interviews with him 15 years ago saying having poorly constructed guitars made you work hard on getting something out of them.  Like it was the struggle that made the music.  

    Countdown to "Jack White sold out!!!" rants.

    That's exactly what he was saying in "It might get loud".  Very interesting.

  5. I saw Aerosmith at the FEC in 1986(?).  Joey Kramer was throwing out drum sticks about every 30 seconds.  People were killing each other to grab one of them (I got one). They went on to play "my big 10 inch" and Steven Tyler was slobbering his big ass lips all over his harmonica.  He throws the harmonica out into the audience, and the crowd just parted.  Nobody wanted to touch that thing.  It sat on the floor for a good 15 seconds before someone finally went in and grabbed it.

  6. 6 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

    Google reverse search says "John Prine & Bruce Springsteen", both of which are obvious . . . but isn't that Dylan on the right?

    Yep.  But who is the hotness in the background!?!?

  7. 12 hours ago, Reynolds Woodcock said:

    Not exactly on topic, but I will be in Japan for 2 weeks starting next week. Plan on sampling Japanese whiskey, but am totally ignorant. Any suggestions, or do i need a new thread?

    I've only tried the Hakushu 12 and I like it a lot.  It's much more akin to scotch than bourbon.

     

    fullsizeoutput_2636_large.jpeg?v=1491437

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, jimmyjazz said:

    I don't know why I find her oddly attractive.  I guess it's the fact that she doesn't give a shit.  She's kinda dumpy, and isn't exactly blessed with a beautiful face, but she owns it all.  

     

    She has/had a pretty good body and she wasn’t afraid to show it off. I still remember that “do you wanna touch” video. 

×
×
  • Create New...