Jump to content

ButtFumble

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    8847
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ButtFumble

  1. fuck he was wide open where has that been all game
  2. yea back before all the CGI bullshit fucked everything up
  3. is that the love child of kathy griffin and carrot top next to the sign language translator?
  4. Kelci throwing to the ref looked like some of the passes in this game
  5. TEMU is shit you should order and have sent directly to the landfill
  6. how come everyone is not mentioning that mush mouth fuck bad bunny?
  7. I am ushering myself to the bathroom to take a dump
  8. you left out Momma Kelcie
  9. these fucking running plays are not getting it done
  10. I'm called papi also 🤠
  11. Not if he actually turns shit around. It would have taken 3-4 seasons, but I think he could have at least given us an appearance in the big game. against a kubiak coached aggy!
  12. hahaha a trick play against dallas can be a run up the middle
  13. Shipleys! (especially the Colt McCoy owned ones)
  14. that was a dumb ass penalty there
  15. damn Andy must have eaten Travis' nuggies
  16. https://www.usatoday.com/videos/sports/ncaaf/2013/04/16/2088997/ Texas A&M uses DJ at football practice
  17. menopause VEOZAH™!
  18. maybe these teams need some body positivity to keep them going
  19. he got a purdy mouth 😝
  20. you might need some VEOZAH™
  21. that was not what happened 1. the AAU places a value on "competitively awarded" research.....land grant universities get statutorily awarded research dollars from the feds based on being a "land grant" university with those dollars awarded based in a large part on the agricultural productivity of the state the university is in......a very very very large number of AAU members are also land grant universities and the AAU has never considered their statutorily awarded dollars as part of the evaluation criteria.....because getting those dollars has nothing to do with the quality of research of the university and also because other universities that are not land grant do not have the ability to compete for those dollars......that was simply an argument that Nebraska used to cover their ineptitude....and more so their inability to take those land grant dollars and use them to build out infrastructure that can then gain large amounts of competitively awarded life sciences grant money......with the AAU placing a high emphasis in life sciences grants because they feel those often have national and international benefits (along with engineering and medicine) 2. Nebraska made the claim that not having a medical school hurt them (something similar to what Iowa State just claimed).....but there were issues with this false claim as well.....Nebraska - Lincoln is one of only 2 major public universities in Nebraska with the other being Omaha and the other public schools in the state minor players of under 7,000 enrollment......there is the one medical school as well.....there was NOTHING that stopped that medical school from being merged in with the Lincoln campus (similar to how aggy has all of their medical components across the state all under college station since about 2012)......but the state never saw fit to do that.....and the reason for that is because that medical school is not a major producer or research it is more of a teaching facility......and more importantly the AAU evaluates universities against "peer universities" (both inside and outside of the AAU) in part based on having a medical school or not having a medical school so in the past prior to the Dell Medical School opening up Texas would be evaluated against PUBLIC universities like Berkeley (that does not have a medical school), or against aggy (that in the past did not have their medical schools under the college station campus) or against Iowa State, Oregon, or Colorado (that do not have a medical schools).....in the case of Texas the medical school is new so that plays a part and more so Texas has plenty of other factors in their favor to remain well within the AAU even now being evaluated against "peers" with medical schools or in the case of private schools Rice is not evaluated against Vanderbilt or Duke or Tulane because they all have medical schools....they would be evaluated against any AAU members that are private without a medical school (Cal Tech) or outside of the AAU schools like SMU, Baylor, Tulsa, or similar private universities in the case of NU because they were already being told to improve or face removal and because their medical school they COULD have merged was not very research productive the only thing that would have happened if they had merged it would have been a new set of schools to evaluate NU against especially in the AAU and all of those schools and their medical component would have been an even harsher comparison for NU....thus they were out the AAU of course uses many other evaluation criteria that are not based solely on research and are not based on total research, but the end result was NU had ab out a decade warning to improve and they did nothing and they were out
  22. I feel bad for Jr he has been a good guy his whole career and I really do not see his wife as that big of a bitch either....his little brother is a giant bitch though and him and more so his wife taking up for that fuckhead is stupid and does add to his wife being looked at poorly it sucks his dad had to pull this bullshit a week before the game though....and that is a hard looking 53 he has "been around the block" and he looks like he needs some help....his last DWI was in 2019 and you would think he could try and control his shit better before the big game, but clearly not
  23. ESPN/Disney is in a bad spot they have an older demographic for ESPN that are sports rabid, might have some that are "technologically challenged", and others (like me and a lot I know) that are not at all technologically challenged, but generally see the streaming aspect of things as kind of a pain in the ass relative to TV......and at the same time if I am going to stream then I am going to use one of the 200 free bootleg streaming sites out there and not pay shit (and get a 1,000% better quality stream that the shit ESPN currently puts out) on the other hand Disney has a younger demographic with kids or some slightly older kids that are "screen addicted" and probably can't even use cable TV and might not own a TV (or it collects dust) and that thinks streaming is everything some of the older and more rabid ESPN sports fans live in some rural areas that have shitty internet even today or some live in older (and still nice) built out places that still have shitty internet because it cost so much to come in and upgrade.....these people can still get cable TV or they can get sat coverage and that works just fine for their sports addiction.....most of them do not give a shit about Disney content the Disney people are probably in newer developments that were built out with internet or at least internet in mind or a lot are in very high density places that have been upgraded......but a lot of them don't give a shit about ESPN....and of course they are used to ditching streaming services at the drop of a hat, signing up and binge watching then dropping, being offered all kinds of incentives to switch or to stay a customer and they are loyal to jack shit all while being combined that ESPN/Disney infrastructure and revenues are predicated on forcing masses of people to pay a lot of money for a large amount of shit they do not want AND cable and sat companies rolling over and going along with it now cable and say companies (horribly shitty run companies which is why somehow as near monopolies several have gone BK in the past) have finally figured out that people are dumping them because of the cost of paying for shit they do not want and they are pushing back.....far too late though.....and then there is ESPN making it clear as day they are going to go around "cable companies".....but through ass backwards luck "cable companies" are not internet companies in most areas and doing half ass well at it.....so ESPN/Disney still needs them or more so needs their future streaming subs to have good service from them but ESPN/Disney and the cable (and even more so sat companies that are NOT internet providers) are now clearly at odds and ESPN/Disney need to navigate all of this while getting their massively shit filled inflated cost structure under control and trying to figure out how to still fuck people into paying lots of money for shit they do not want in a long term basis.....while clearly moving to fuck over those they still need to depend on for revenue some in the short term and others long into the future really the ramifications of being assholes for 20+ years and just not giving a shit other than tossing out shit and forcing people to take it
  24. post pics or it did not happen
×
×
  • Create New...