Jump to content

Chopper

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    9313
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by Chopper

  1. 43 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:


    Why did the shutdown cost Republicans elections if the shutdown is the Democrats’ fault? Oh, maybe some people are finally seeing through your bullshit lies.

    What's wild is his social media post said it explicitly.

    if it hasn't already been posted

    image.png.88ef23005b2663b9dba214fe3c698511.png

    • Hook 'Em 1
  2. how many solid R seats did the texas republikan party dilute in order to try to get more repub seats in Congress? Possible future Leopards eating faces post. Arrogant fucks. 

    • Hook 'Em 5
    • Drool 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 2
  3. 1 hour ago, TwiceHorn said:

    Here's common-gooder Adrian Vermeule weighing in on the Fuentes debacle.

    Usually, these common-gooders at least pretend to stay above it all.  

    The meat of what he wrote is apparently a translation of a 1927 Carl Schmitt book. 

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
  4. 4 hours ago, Chad Fuck said:

    Is this fucking real?  

    I feel like I have to ask this question all the time, and the answer is always the most depressing - and most expected - response.

    "Patel and Wilkins met at a friend's event in Nashville in 2022 and started their relationship a few months later, in early 2023. 'We just happened to meet,' Wilkins recounted, noting that the 19-year age gap she has with him always felt irrelevant. "I have always liked [him], when I met him, I just liked that he was so, so honest," Wilkins gushed. "He's exactly who he is all the time. His character is incredible. His values are incredible."

    Quote above is from the int'l business times. There is little known about her background. Not sure of the logic behind the Israeli, in particular, honeypot accusation but who knows. 

     

    Screenshot2025-11-03at1_29_41PM.png.b662df7ffe0817fdca9ba396f68157f4.png

     

    Quote

    Alexis Wilkins, the longtime girlfriend of FBI Director Kash Patel, is suing an ex-agent and self-described whistleblower for defamation, alleging he called her a former Israeli spy whose relationship with Patel is a “honeypot” operation.

    The defendant, Kyle Seraphin, “has maliciously lied” about Wilkins by “falsely asserting that she—an American-born country singer—is an agent of a foreign government, assigned to manipulate and compromise the Director of the FBI,” Wilkins’ attorney wrote in the lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court in Austin, Texas.

    Wilkins accuses Seraphin, a conservative podcaster who calls himself a “recovering FBI agent,” of “using this fabricated story as self-enriching clickbait.”

    Wilkins is seeking at least $5 million in damages. The suit was first reported by Reason and highlighted Friday morning by Court Watch.

    Her legal complaint homes in on Seraphin’s comments on “The Kyle Seraphin Show” on Aug. 22.

    Patel “has had his own little ‘honeypot’ issue that’s been going on of late, so we’re just going to acknowledge it real publicly,” Seraphin said on the episode at the center of the lawsuit.

    “He’s got a girlfriend that is half his age, who is apparently is both a country music singer, a political commentator on Rumble, a friend of John Rich through [FBI deputy Director Dan] Bongino, who also now owns a big chunk of Rumble, and she’s also a former Mossad agent in what is like the equivalent of their NSA.”

    “But I’m sure that’s totally because, like, she’s really looking for like a cross-eyed, you know, kind of thickish built, super cool bro who’s almost 50 years old who’s Indian in America,” Seraphin said sarcastically.“Like it has nothing to do with the fact that uh we’re really close to the Trump administration,” he said. “Anyway, I’m sure that’s totally just like love. That’s what real love looks like.”
     
    Seraphin did not identify Wilkins by name, but her suit says his statement is “obviously about her specifically.”

     

     
    • Haha 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  5. 4 hours ago, Red Five said:

    Mike Johnson’s superpower is being without shame. He will simply answer “I don’t know anything about that” until reporters stop asking him about it.

    Yes, he is afraid to even look at the person asking him a question because he knows his facial reactions would look bad on tv. Seems like he's always looking down unless the question comes from a friendly.

  6. 8 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

    I am skeptical they have some big technocratic plan. Technocratic bills are what they do when they grudgingly have to do something. And you know what? The Biden era technocratic schemes were actually pretty good, they just did not in any way sufficiently address the crisis the country was facing. The other problem with the technocratic approach is that the Republicans can easily undo them in about ten seconds whereas the changes the Republicans make linger in the system for decades.

    But even to the extent this is true it is based on the idea that everybody likes the status quo and agrees it is good and we just need to make a few adjustments which is a very 1990s way of thinking.

    They have a beginning of a plan. The makings of one, if you will.

    Seriously I was imprecise. The congressional leadership doesn't have a plan. They're fucking clueless and soft af. I'm hoping a dynamic congressional election leads to a pres candidate who has some fire in the belly and populist ideas for change. 

  7. 11 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

    The only thing the Dem establishment seems to care about is their donors. Losing elections bothering them would imply they actually want power and have a plan of what to do with it.

    They have a plan it's just more technocrat, like Obama, than it is populist or revolutionary. That's going to have to change. I think a few of the old-timers get primaried and shoved out next year, despite the backing of the party. Yeah that's probably overly optimistic but I've gotta believe.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
  8. 17 hours ago, Pato del Muerto said:

    I don’t think that answers my question.  A grocery store participates in snap, does the equal treatment for customer rule apply to all customers and all prices, or just snap (or whichever federal program)?

    The government is abusing federal law and the Constitution left and right but as someone pointed out, cruelty is the point so they put out this reminder that in theory is meant to stop "regular" customers from paying higher prices to support SNAP customers.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
×
×
  • Create New...