-
Posts
5281 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by SuingToGetAMessageBoard?
-
-
2 hours ago, PilotsError said:
Three men were convicted in 1966. Mujahid Abdul Halim (known as Talmadge Hayer and Thomas Hagan)
he's not a wartime consiglieri.
- 1
-
jesus christ that cast.
QuoteSaoirse Ronan Timothée Chalamet ... Zeffirelli Elisabeth Moss Léa Seydoux ... Simone Cécile de France Bill Murray ... Arthur Howitzer Jr. Edward Norton Willem Dafoe Christoph Waltz ... Boris Schommers Tilda Swinton ... J. K. L. Berensen Liev Schreiber Owen Wilson Adrien Brody Rupert Friend Benicio Del Toro Alex Lawther Anjelica Huston Fisher Stevens ... Legal Advisor Frances McDormand Jeffrey Wright ... Roebuck Wright Jason Schwartzman ... Hermes Jones Morgane Polanski ... Main Splatter School Girl Friend Henry Winkler - 1
- 1
-
Misses:
Both roles. Will Farrell is too silly to take any of the action seriously or care about the plot. Marky Mark isn't funny enough to make me think it's a comedy.
Going too far on either side of that spectrum end up making it a poor man's Bad Boys, with kinda funny but mostly action Will Smith and mostly funny and kinda action Martin Lawrence. Seems like both leads have to kinda pitch in on both parts of "action comedy." Maybe it's just a bad script though.
-
7 hours ago, EMAWesome said:
i think this dude is suggesting we expand the house of representatives to 330,000,000 people.
-
1 hour ago, JustBecause said:
I’ll play your game. Yes I have a BS and MS in Engineering from Texas. Your pithy comments aside I notice that if you (Including all your cohorts on this website) don’t agree with someone’s view point you call them names and neg them. Which is fine but I would think it would be boring yelling inside this echo chamber all the time.
playing the game I assume you are a Texas grad but that really doesn’t matter either way to me.
Good for you. Obviously very smart.
Now apply those brains to go and pick up any scholarly writings on “treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors”and see if a violation of a criminal statute (hint — those were passed after they wrote that in the constitution) is needed.
have the fortitude to say “I’m smarter than hannity. I don’t need him to tell me what is true. I can learn it myself.”
-
6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
The Jeffersonian experiment ended in the 19th century. Hamilton's vision of America won.
yeah, i don't really know what i'm talking about. just thought the phrase served as good verbal flair instead of 'the country's bedrock principles'.
-
5 minutes ago, immamac said:
let's not kid ourselves with the "[career public servant]'s of a higher moral standard than [guy who has literally been sued for fraud by half the states in the country, including the one we are sitting in right now]" bullshit though
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Mrs Whiggins said:
I'm curious, though. (not trolling). Given the rancor surrounding her from the GOP et al, were she in office for the past three years she would have had no House, no Senate but the economy continuing the climb it started prior to the election. Would the midterms have been as successful? How would things stand now w/respect to people's views given the economy? Would there have been an impeachment w/respect to the Bidens coming from the GOP and trying to tie it to her?
That would be successive Democratic presidents which is somewhat rare. If this was discussed elsewhere, I'm happy to go off and read about it in another topic so as not to derail.
Agree with TwiceHorn, but wanted to chime in that I'd give up the 2018 blue wave for hillary over trump 100 times out of 100. trump is an existential crises to the jeffersonian experiment.
- 1
-
14 hours ago, JustBecause said:
Curious, since what I said is indisputable.
Are you a UT grad? I am honestly curious about retards that have achieved things in life. How they must have compartmentalized things in their brain or something like that. Something that allowed you to do well enough in school to get a pretty respected degree, but remain completely unaware about even the basics of something impeachment, which was front page news with in depth stories everywhere. If I've incorrectly assumed you are a college grad and you are just retarded in all aspects of life, I apologize.
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, TXSG8R said:
Hillary would certainly have an agenda, but she would play within the rules. I guess that makes her deep state.
All Presidents have egos. All want glory. But every other one in our history -- let's go back to WWII, since that is the history we all know the best -- has sought there glory through the reflected glow of "look what I built." They tried to make some aspect of the country the best it can be, knowing that they in turn get to stroke off on their greatness when everyone attributes it to them. Trump is unique in his quest just for praise, money, and watching people grovel. There is no attempt at reflected glow.
-
yeah, he has like a million percent approval. he represents an all white, uneducated district. he's not going anywhere.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, immamac said:You people in here acting like Hillary wasn't just as bad as Trump are really something else - the only difference is she wouldn't have been gloating publicly about most of it and she's a "more political" public speaker.
trying to both sides this shit still huh. i wonder what you guys are witnessing?
hillary would probably be telling everyone not to trust the news. hillary would probably be undercutting our intelligence agencies' abilities to warn and protect about weaknesses in our elections. hillary would probably be trying to curry favor with the authoritarians where she just happens to have substantial real property investments. hillary probably would have facilitated canning career public servants executing policy because it was inconvenient for friends' businesses. hillary probably would be stocking the appellate courts with a bunch of thirty year old ideologues that got straight c's. hillary would probably be cooking up ways to stir racial hatred, like building a monument to her racism with money stolen from the defense budget. hillary would be targeting states that didn't vote for her for political retribution. she is just so sneaky though because she is a 'more political' public speaker, so we wouldn't have noticed.
- 11
-
1 hour ago, JustBecause said:
Probably has more legal standing than the impeachment debacle. Since there is an actual law being violated.
biggest reason i don't call myself a republican any more? everyone associated with them spends all their time demonstrating that they don't know what the hell they are talking about.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
14 minutes ago, Incredulity said:John Kass isn't an Op-Ed writer, but writes a daily column. So certainly this is a column based on his opinion.
His brother Jack is a regular poster here.
- 9
- 4
-
amicus filed by bobby bo, no doubt.
-
-
28 minutes ago, hpslugga said:
Again, what exactly can Trump/the GOP actually do?
Romney is a multi-millionaire senator who presides over a seat that hasn’t belonged to a democrat since January of 1977.
Trump, as well as the GOP, literally has nothing to threaten him with. He’s rich and the Mormons fucking love him. This is a guy who carried Utah in the 2012 election with a percentage that rivaled Reagan’s in 1984.
In the Senate midterm election, facing the so called Blue Wave, he still managed to capture nearly 2/3rds of the vote. The only way that Mitt Romney loses that seat is if he retires or dies. He’s not getting voted out and he won’t face expulsion either. And even if they could manage to get him out, he’s not going to be suffering. Again, the guy’s net worth is somewhere in the $200 million range, and he cares about that more than he does being a senator.
The only thing rich fucks like that care about is their legacy since there’s nothing else to really worry about. He wouldn’t want to be known as the deciding vote, and in that alternate reality, he would be.
I appreciate your willingness to concede the pettiness and vindictiveness of that party, but let’s not kid ourselves into believing that this was some brave act of heroism. It wasn’t. If he was as principled as you’re making him out to be, he would announce today that he’s switching parties. Watch him do exactly not that. Watch him, instead, take to Twitter how fucking great he thinks Rush Limbaugh is...oh wait, he already did that.
this is all aggressively dumb
-
6 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
Especially considering statements like this:
that tweet took some discipline. you know he just wants to lash out at romney, but he can't project anything but win win win, so he has to ignore it for now.
-
time for me to start putting money somewhere. my current plan is to just open a vanguard account and buy some ETFs that track the indexes and start my learning that way. good idea?
- 2
-
8 minutes ago, Michael Knight said:
Does anyone really think he would vote this way if the outcome was uncertain
He hates Trump’s guts. If he was the 67th vote, he would DEFINITELY convict.
-
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:
Manchin, Jones, Sinema.
We'll see.
jones already said convict.
-
2 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:
In an empty gesture guaranteed to do nothing but generate headlines. Sorry for the cynicism, but it’s easy to make a good speech when you know the outcome isn’t in doubt
it has huge implications of blowback on him. it is in no way an empty gesture.
- 3
-
4 minutes ago, mdmost said:
Cue the Romney wanted a cabinet positions
*begging
-
37 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:
Susan Collins feels that Trump has learned from his impeachment:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/susan-collins-will-vote-to-acquit-trump-saying-hes-learned-from-impeachment/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab8a&linkId=81760957oh, i imagine he learned quite a lot.
2 ohio state players charged with rape, kidnapping
in Football
Posted