-
Posts
3782 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by SmokeyTheBear
-
-
Just now, Equinox said:
lol. Jesus with a guitar.
Yeah, I'm religious as hell.
Why not answer the question?
If this activity of kids being ripped away from their parents is happening, is it wrong?
-
Just now, Equinox said:
When will someone answer my question about their local embassy?
For someone with a representation of Jesus in your avatar, you have a real hard time outlining your moral limits.
-
2 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:
no solutions, just personal attacks....What are the real options....
1. Detain the children with their families - - - Dems sue saying unlawful to detain children more than 30 days, even with parent (resulting in an explosion of children illegally crossing the border)
Option 2 - release them to family members, often illegal themselves, and have 80% never show up for a court date. This is unacceptable. (resulting in open borders and more illegal crossings with children)
Option 3 house them separately from family and actually know where they are. Only option left unless we are sending them home with family immediately or let them claim asylum in Mexico or Canada.
The Democrats have forced this situation and maybe simply enforcing the law and not championing catch and release open border policies is actually the most humane for the illegal immigrant the Americans citizens forced to lower their already low standard of living for elite liberal guilt.
If this forces them to make a change then so be it. They have shown zero desire except to encourage and exacerbate the situation.
If you care so much for these children you will sit down and vote for immigration reform, if not you will continue personal attacks until you get your open border way.
The media will stop at nothing to get their open borders, and they want nothing more than for this to continue. It is win win for them, status quo for open borders or blow back from the child care
And here I thought DACA was immigration reform. The title of this thread must have confused me.
-
2 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:
"Ripped from their parents" - congratulations, you even got the nomenclature of the talking point down. Again, isn't it convenient that this is an issue "now". Disingenuous bullshit is what it is. Where was your selective outrage when the Human Impact Partners published their study in 2013 citing an estimated 150,000 children were separated from their parents in 2012 alone. The majority under the age of 10. So they devolve into an argument of semantics on where they are separated rather than the fact of separation. Families were still separated, but it was "different". Housing children with adults in detention centers - which the previous administration was warned were havens of sexual attacks and depravity. Or the terrifying "Chase and Scatter" tactics designed to break up travelling groups, resulting in children dying or being abandoned in the wilderness. Obama built a massive deportation machine, which involved the systematic detention of children and separation of families. Advocates organized against the administration on these issues for years - and not a fucking peep from the sycophants on this board. This went on for almost a decade. So no, this isn't nor ever has been about justification - but calling out the selective rage bullshit this board loves to hop on to now than gun control is dying back, the blue wave is dwindling, and the Dem's desperately need another topic before the midterms.
You know what could undercut this talking point? Trump changing the "law" without conditions. He could be a hero in all this if it is as you say. He could come out on TV and say, "We found a law from Obama that is so unethical, so immoral that we had to change it right away for the good of these kids. Regardless of their parents transgressions." Instead we get, "This serves as a good deterrent to immigration" and "give me my wall, and i'll stop having to do this act".
-
19 minutes ago, SmokeyTheBear said:
@Equinox - if this is happening, is it wrong for it to happen?
Cmon buddy, simple question. Should be a simple answer.
-
@Equinox - if this is happening, is it wrong for it to happen?
-
Brunch at Jack Allen's then Sushi for dinner
-
You can look at purely the recent actions of Strozk and Trump to find out who is the innocent man.
-
15 minutes ago, Chooky said:
It will be a real bummer for the Tump 'Ol Party if even one Democrat gets revealed to be tangled up in this investigation. That would render their victimization card completely useless.
Oh you mean the deep state plant? Pffffft
-
Almost sounds like Trump is pro union
-
And the projection continues
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Tom said:
Let me know when the investigations and "lock them up" chants begin from your ilk for Trump's kids using private email for government business and for Trump using a non-secure phone in the white house. We know how much these security issues matter to you guys
Or former President Bush. He should be in a prison by now if the same standards are to be met.
-
I'm awaiting Aphelion's feelings on this. Without questions preferably.
-
To what end though? I want him to spell out that his vote for Trump was only to beat Hillary. That all that follows is acceptable because at least it is not Hillary. To document it and own it.
-
So. Many. Questions?
-
39 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
I won't be backing him for re election. He served his purpose.
I'll bite. What was his purpose?
-
Manafort to jail. Giant nothingburger going on.
-
3 minutes ago, VRHorn said:
This is going to be good to revisit in 2020.
-
2 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Hark....... didst thou sayest ilk ??? hahahahahahahahaha. Your pandering to a woman named Hillary was far more dangerous to our democracy, and completely sheeplike in its idiocy..
Where have I stated that I'm pandering to Hillary?
How would she have been more dangerous to our democracy over Trump?
School me and my ilk. Please. I'm desperate to understand your point of view.
-
42 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
Nah just seeing the butt hurt BS going on here is enough. No dick sucking over there anyway. C'mon on over and have a ganders for yerself. It's the bestsest fun on this forum daily
Nah I prefer the plethora of echo chambers where we discuss the shit your ilk have got us into. You can have your safe space to yourselves.
-
Just now, Onboard 2.0 said:
You can hear the dick sucking all the way over here on my computer from the usual suspects.
Browsing the Hillary will never be President thread again?
-
4 hours ago, slorch said:
Don't be a fucking cunt.
The lefties on here are cunts about rep.
You like to neg and act like it's nothing,,,until someone answers back.
You motherfuckers love your echo-chamber, and nobody should dare interrupt it.
You dumbasses are so intent on hearing what you want to hear, that posts where I said I disliked Trump still get negged. It's become quite the circle jerk around here.
Don't start no shit. Won't be no shit. It's that fucking simple. have an opinion and post it. Don't neg shit just because...only to cry about it later. And y'all cry like bitches that you are... just like in real life.
But Hillary will never be President....
-
I'm just starting my journey into converting my home into a smart home. I use Harmony Hub and Ecobee to control my media center and thermostat. Was pretty easy to integrate them with my Echo. Ecobee has Alexa built in.
Now I can walk in and tell Alexa to turn on one of my favorite channels and it'll do it while setting the room temp to what I want.
Next up will be lights and wall plugs.
-
2 minutes ago, EMAWesome said:
All the key witnesses have already been given immunity by the DOJ from the previous administration and most of the evidence has already been destroyed.
If it is so known that evidence has been destroyed, that means there is evidence of the evidence being destroyed. Why hasn't the Trump camp provided that evidence?
inb4 "yo dog, i heard you like evidence".jpg
DACA, immigration reform whatever
in Cloak Room
Posted · Edited by SmokeyTheBear
So it's not a law, its a policy, one in which Trump could say stop right now..........but he doesn't. So where is the moral outrage from the Trumpkins on this? If there is none, then you view this as an acceptable practice as part of a zero tolerance strategy.
And if that is your point of view, it should be an easy thing to admit to, unless you know it is an immoral act that you can't agree with.