Sawbonz
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Sawbonz
-
-
-
On 2/12/2022 at 4:16 PM, Not a cat said:
I think a better way to get his ass killed is leave him attached to a slow middle aged human that already had a heavy pack on him. I had him on a handless leash that attached to my belt so his best bet was not to be attached to my slow ass if a moose was coming after us.
On 2/12/2022 at 5:17 PM, Bevo said:My son and I were chased by a small moose in Moonlight Basin up the mountain from Big Sky so this hits close to home. I remember thinking "Okay, I'm the adult here so at some point, I've got to figure out how to fight this thing". Luckily, he was able to hop the same townhouse fence that I tumbled over.
Kevin is disappointed in y’all
-
-
-
23 minutes ago, elfenix said:
it's been a century
QuoteLee is best known for his public relations work with the Rockefeller Family and the Nazi Regime.

-
-
5 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:
live in the most diverse county in Texas. I do not know what the breakdowns are.
I’m pretty sure you, like me, vote during early voting and you have choices about where and when you can vote. Come November 8, go down to one of the polling locations on the other side of the tracks at 6 pm. Mark the person at the end of the line (it will be out the door and down the sidewalk) when you get there and time them till they come out. These are folks who can’t take off work to go vote at their convenience. They may have had to scramble to find childcare so they can vote on election Day. They may have had to take a bus, or even more than one bus to get to their designated polling location. Whatever the circumstances may have been that kept them from early voting, they still have the right to vote. And I bet they can’t do it on election day in the evening in 10 or 15 minutes.
-
2 minutes ago, PenelopeWitherspoon said:
But your question is wrong footed from the start. THAT is why no one is going to engage you, because you are not really interested. Your mind is made up. Plus, you are comparing apples and fucking oranges and trying to pass it off as just asking questions. You might be an idiot, but the rest of us aren't, and it is a massive waste of time to even respond to you.

-
-
2 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:
Pretty sure no one is prohibiting the possession of water. I can understand you're upset that the free shit army has to draw the line somewhere.
So you think it is reasonable to have to plan to bring water with you because you know you are going to have to wait in line for hours in order to cast your vote?
I’ve been civil with you thus far. Your free shit army comment is fairly ridiculous if you are at all familiar with my posting history. I’ll just say my problem is not with restricting “free water” but an arbitrary constraint on voting that makes water in line and bathroom access necessary as part of the voting process.
-
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:
For crying out loud, something like 40% of Texas mail-in ballot applications are being rejected because the law makes it ridiculously vague and hard to get a ballot. That's ON PURPOSE.
Ironically, here in Texas this will likely disproportionately harm Republican candidates, because mail in isn’t available to everyone. The elderly (and maybe military living elsewhere?) are much more likely to vote this way, and in Texas more likely to vote republican
-
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:When Trump carried the country in '16, there was countless posts about: IQ requirements to vote, mandatory education and civil courses to vote etc. People loved talking about all the idiots that lined up to vote for that MF and how they could/should be limited since their decision making is all so flawed. Was it serious, you tell me. But the sanctity of the right to vote rings a bit hollow after many of the opinions on this board.
11 minutes ago, Sawbonz said:This makes absolutely no sense. Show me one piece of proposed legislation to limit anyone’s ability to vote based on any of those criteria
The mainstream of your party wants people to have to stand for in long lines with no access to water or restrooms in order to exercise their constitutional right to vote. They want partisan elected officials to be able to override those votes if they don’t agree with the outcome. And they want women (even 11 year olds raped by a family member) to have to carry a fetus to term if there is cardiac electrical activity visible on US. That is mainstream GOP. These are laws in place or soon to be in place. This is what you stand for
-
5 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:
You can very easily disagree with the strong outliers of each party.
Do you disagree with heartbeat laws for abortion and states being able to reject the choice of their voters for president? Because if you disagree with those you are disagreeing with the mainstream of the GOP. You are in denial
-
Just now, fattyflattie said:
Outside of message board hyperbole, neither are the R's.
This is absolutely not true. Several states have enacted more restrictive voting laws. A few states have Republican candidates running for SOS on a promise to overturn the will of the voters of their state if their preferred candidate doesn’t win. I mean these people are saying this stuff, go watch their campaign videos. Many will win their primaries and some will get elected. These are your people
If one of my daughters is raped, she may have to carry her rapist’s child to term here in Texas. Your mainstream GOP legislators passed this bill and your mainstream GOP governor signed it. And these mainstream elected officials are facing primaries from their right. It’s going to get worse. Open your eyes. This is not hyperbole
I have a lot of problems with an overly broad social safety net. I’ll take a Medicaid expansion and prolonged unemployment benefits any day over what we are seeing from the current GOP
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:When do I not post in good faith? I can easily post how I used to be a Democrat over and over, if that would change your mind about how in tuned I am to politics.
And yeah, much better to be making promises to your constituents of color only to fuck them over decade after decade. But this time we're super cereal guys, just make sure you keep us in office.
I think you post in good faith. I think you are in denial about where the mainstream right currently is.
I’m not sure when you joined this community, but I’ve been posting in one form or another on longhorn message boards since mid 90s. The vast majority of the posters on this board that you are calling leftists are actually center/right pre-trump. We realized there is no room for us either as Republicans or independents who vote Republican more often than not in the present GOP. In the last 8 to 10 years what you think you identify with has gone off the rails. What you think you are identifying with as someone who is for limited government and low spending is long gone and is not coming back to the GOP. You are going to be either pushed towards where we are or you’re going to be sucked into the far right insanity. This isn’t what we want. The purity tests have already started. If Mitt Romney and Liz Cheney (and now Mitch McConnell!) are vilified as the left, the party is dead.
-
-
-
ANTIFA
in Cloak Room
-
1 hour ago, Beau Vine said:
I’m not falling for the banana in the tailpipe
-
-
-
-
-
31 minutes ago, Harrison Bergeron said:
Someone predicted this: https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/trudeau-dictator_b_6314494
"The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let's hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions."
2 hours ago, Sawbonz said:Do you know what a prime minister is or how one is chosen?






Russia and American elections, now featuring radical republicans as co-stars
in Cloak Room