Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    7125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Foosters

  1. 4 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

    L.O.L

     

    People aren't bitching about the immigrants (oh my God, they also happen to be brown, weird??!?) that are filling the university research labs across the nation, or that are training to be our next wave of doctors and engineers.  They bitch about the people who's absolute peak in life is washing dishes, a floor, or mowing a yard (and the subsequent 9 fuck trophies that will follow).  Newsflash, no one likes the white people (or their trophies) that do those jobs either.  It's a reminder that without the laziness of a larger group of people, these people largely serve no purpose.  It's why not a single person with any of those jobs live in your neighborhood.    Blaming it on racism though, especially if you are not one of the victims (hint, you Brisketexan are certainly not, surname notwithstanding) is just internetz fun or a way to scratch the I want to whine itch. 

    People see uneducated, poor, and low skill people fleeing to look for a better situation.  Well, you were a whole hell of a lot more responsible for what you are fleeing than me.  You trashed your first pad, time to move onto the next host? Have no want to assimilate? Meh.  Send me some more potential doctors and engineers, I'll get the lawn figured out.  

    There is a contingent of people who are into it for the hate, without a doubt.   But people that want to stop immigration humanely could do it in an instant.  Remove their ability to vote, even with citizenship.  Go 3 generations deep.  Democrats would give less than a fuck about an immigrant at that point.  And if your life isn't better here with that as a stipulation, stay home and fix your own squalor. 

    go sell this shit to your fellow pedophile supporters. No one here is buying this.

    Is it a coincidence that the ONLY group of refugees that Trump wants are WHITE South Africans?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_South_African_refugee_program

    • Hook 'Em 4
  2. He was in the arraignment court today. In a suicide gown. Waived his right to a speedy arraignment. I assume the defense is going to pursue a "not guilty by reason of insanity" defense, which is probably the only angle they have. Will need to show that he was suffering from a mental/disease defect, and due to that disease/defect, was unable to understand the nature of his act or that his act was morally and legally wrong. Important to note that it cannot be based off of intoxication, or even that the disease/defect were caused by narcotics.

     

    Nick Reiner appears in court on Wednesday in Los Angeles.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  3. 19 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

    How Much Do Illegal Immigrants Cost the U.S.?
     

      Reveal hidden contents

     

    An ongoing border crisis that saw 5,000 illegal aliens being released into the United States per day in December of last year is a microcosm of a much larger issue as President Joe Biden aims to recapture the White House in a crucial election year.

    The issue is a $150.7 billion one, shared between federal and state governments, and that's just one year.

    Since the inauguration of President Biden on January 20, 2021, over 3.3 million illegal immigrants have been released into the U.S., according to the Committee on the Judiciary and Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement, which is costing taxpayers billions at the federal and state levels.

    A report issued by the committee in mid-January says that the Biden administration has, among other things, "dismantled interior immigration enforcement to allow illegal aliens to remain in the country," which is contributing to a growing cost borne by U.S. taxpayers. A separate study issued by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) quantified the monetary side of that burden.
     

     

    Newsweek has reached out to the Committee on the Judiciary and Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement by email for comment on Friday.

    The FAIR study, released in March last year, documented the financial toll of illegal immigration on the U.S., taking into account factors like emergency medical care, incarcerating illegal aliens in local jails, and federal budgets that pay out billions in welfare every year, pegging the net annual cost at $150.7 billion.

    Arriving at the figure by subtracting the estimated $32 billion of tax contributions made by illegal immigrants, FAIR said the economic impact would have otherwise been $182 billion. In 2017, the U.S. spent roughly $116 billion on illegal immigration, suggesting that the problem is a growing one.

    https://www.newsweek.com/illegal-immigration-costs-us-billions-biden-administration-policy-impact-taxpayer-burden-1866555

    Obviously the only answer is then to detain Brown American citizens. Genius 

  4. 2 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

     

    This is according to data from the Migration Policy Institute. In short I think it’s something like 75% of those deported under Obama that never saw due process. They didn’t want High profile raids like Trump they opted for silent raids. They perused the employer’s I-9 records for those who were illegal. And they were then fired. And then LATER rounded up but the Obama administration also went after the employers too—aiming to prosecute them. While they weren’t aiming for high profile raids they certainly did do some of those but also went to the homes and communities and also did things during traffic stops. Obama was known as the deporter in chief for a reason. 75% of his deportees didn’t receive due process and were rounded up. Same as here only Trump WANTS this to be high profile and NOT silent like Obama. Which is a reason imo that ICE agents are now at risk. He could have opted for more silent raids but doesn’t want that. Clearly. But make no mistake Obama had them rounded up at traffic stops, sometimes at work sites but mostly at their homes or in their communities. These aren’t people who were expelled at the border, these were people who were living and working here who received zero due process, and Trump just put that entire process on steroids is all. And he likely still won’t have deported as many as Obama did. 

    Quote

    When President Obama took office in 2009, his administration abandoned some Bush-era strategies, such as worksite enforcement operations, but allowed others to scale up. By 2013, Secure Communities was operational in all jails and prisons in the United States. And the Border Patrol began systematically applying CDS border-wide starting in 2011.

    Congressional funding for immigration enforcement continued to rise. In FY 2012, federal immigration enforcement funding reached nearly $18 billion—a figure 24 percent higher than funding allocated to all other principal federal criminal law enforcement agencies combined (the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals Service, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives).

    As a result of these resources and strategies, noncitizen removals increased significantly, while apprehensions and overall deportations both remained far lower than the numbers seen under the Bush and Clinton administrations.

    PB-Jan2017-T1-large.png

     

    PB-Jan2017-F1-581x250.png

     

    Quote

    Also, removal priorities were increasingly focused on removing noncitizens convicted of crimes. In 2009, 51 percent of interior removals were of individuals convicted of what DHS described as serious crimes. In 2016, DHS reported that more than 90 percent of interior removals were of noncitizens convicted of serious crimes.

     

    Quote

    While the Obama administration record is characterized by much higher removals than preceding administrations, it also shows less focus on increasing absolute numbers of overall deportations and a higher priority on targeting the removals of recently arrived unauthorized immigrants and criminals. The administration also placed a much lower priority on removing those who had established roots in U.S. communities and had no criminal records. This prioritization was achieved by a slowly evolving but deliberate policy, highlighted by the administration’s November 2014 executive actions on immigration.

    https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/obama-record-deportations-deporter-chief-or-not

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 2
  5. Appears that Alan Jackson (different one) has been retained as counsel. Interesting, in that he's a high powered ex-DA, who has handled numerous high profile cases over the years. Given that Nick is allegedly still on suicide watch, unclear who or how Jackson was retained. 

  6. 5 minutes ago, safe sex said:

    Because American citizens weren't being detained? Because people who have legal status weren't being detained at their immigration check-ins and deported? Because government agents weren't ramming their cars into the cars of people they were trying to intimidate or capture, and then lie about what happened? Because agents of the state didn't wear masks and properly identified themselves to members of the public? Because people didn't feel like they needed to always keep their papers on them? Because they weren't shooting protesting priests with pepper balls? Because people weren't being deported to countries they have no connection to? Because we weren't sending people to rot in foreign prisons? Because there wasn't a clear pattern of lawlessness, abuse, lies, and coverups? 

    Maybe that's why people didn't seriously call it the Gestapo. Maybe that's why there was plenty of criticism concerning Obama and his immigration policies (and Biden's!) but not mass protests. Maybe a difference of degree actually fucking matters. 

    ok yeah, but besides all that, what's different? 

    • Hook 'Em 5
    • Haha 2
  7. 12 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:

    Quoting to say there are many good ideas and some when combined may be the right solution to a particular problem. Quoting to say also that there a lot of bad ideas and wrong solutions that FEEL good to say them or to employ them but can and have led to even bigger problems. And some big problems not a soul is willing to compromise on.
     

    what we have here is a lot of wannabe political candidates who don’t have the stones to run for any office of any kind. And I am speaking for myself also.
     

    And while Fit Lump or whatever the shit her knockers are called at least she had the STONES to run for something and won at one point. At least she had the stones. We have a lot of lawyers where when arguing before a Judge there is case precedent and a right way to rule and a wrong way for the Judge to rule based on the law.
     

    But these same posters apply this black and white nonsense and it effects every take on this board and they use these takes to bludgeon anyone who disagrees with them about any issue period,

     

    Teachers and coaches should not do this to young people in their charge. Parents should not if their son or daughter comes home from school say “oh that’s your take on this issue go to your room you Commie/Libtard/Maga asshole…the sky is blue and not indigo bc I say it is!” 
     

    we have too many people coasting on whatever shit they whiffed off MSNOW or CNN or Fox News hot take of the hour and have decided that’s enough to bludgeon people with.
     

    Most of us ain’t bad mother fuckers, we just want to discuss an issue in a way that might yield real ideas. Automatically putting someone into a fucking box bc they heard or read something and want to discuss it is shit. 
     

    Just a few months ago many on this platform said civility is dead and we cannot afford to be civil and we must rise up—so if you NOW want to discuss an issue and find solutions and to compromise it’s bc you no longer have the upper hand. No other reason. If you had the upper hand now you wouldn’t want to be open to any new ideas. Some of you went from burn it all down to now wanting to talk about immigration and so forth. Why? 
     

    and as far as the current administration: has anyone gone to the Orange Cheeto’s office and proposed a solution? Any ideas or is the strategy just to be anti-Cheeto everything and just playing the banjo outside ICE and harassing agents and their families and hoping that might work? Protests can be effective but in the absence of real solutions or proposals they just seem like a bunch of people pissed they aren’t in power. I don’t see many in opposition to the current status quo offering solutions at all, just resistance to what has been offered.
     

    That’s my take as a PROUD INDEPENDENT and people have the right to hate me for it. I ain’t maga and I ain’t a socialist and I’m somewhere in the fucking middle on many many issues. But I can be swayed and I admit i can be wrong. I can also be right. same as the rest of you jackholes. 
     

    But if anyone wants to provide PROOF or documentation that PROVES that immigration did NOT dramatically rise under the previous administration from a credible accepted source have at it. As I said I’m all eyes and all ears. 
     

     

    are you on your period or what

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 4
    • Fuck You 1
×
×
  • Create New...