Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    41578
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. Here's a good one: Strictly speaking, it's true. But who has the burden of proof when you make outrageous allegations and then report them as true? An attempt to confuse the issue. That one was a load of shit, too, as you'd expect from Cocaine Donny.
  2. This really isn't anything related to climate change, this is undoing decades of environmental regulation that has done observable good for the environment.
  3. A criminal conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a criminal act, doesn't have to be in writing, but a meeting of the minds, which mostly requires two-way communication in some form, and an affirmative step by some party to the agreement to commit the act. RICO was developed because of the difficulty of proving the agreement between the boss and the underlings, when they never communicated directly and there were many "cut outs" between them.
  4. She's sassy as fuck and a really good speaker for an interior designer. She does sometimes rather uncritically accept biased narratives.
  5. For whatever reason (upbringing mostly I guess my Dad read the DMN and DTH front to back every day), I am severely biased against TV/video news. If I'm hunting for a story/facts and I get video, I usually curse and hit "back" as many times as I need to. QED, I haven't watched TV news of any kind in more than a decade.
  6. "If you're reading this, you're gay, LOL" is so Groyper/4chan and not anything I can imagine a liberal "committed enough" to commit a murder would leave behind.
  7. It is true that a lot of the above is just opinion. Horrible opinion, but opinion nonetheless. Still, he's barfed out a considerable amount of propaganda, and that bit about trans and machines is weird, very weird, and confusing and also a lie.
  8. Does chemical castration have a meaning? Has a minor ever been chemically castrated under the guise of trans treatment? Was the 2020 election stolen?
  9. OwO. Did I do that right?
  10. Then you are poorly informed about right wing politics. He's a fringey dude, but if you are not aware of fringey people, then you're not adequately aware of what's going on in the GOP and behind the scenes.
  11. Most of us were concerned about "which side was to blame" because we knew, not that we could dunk on or be dunked on on a message board, but that elected officials, like Donald Trump, Nancy Mace, Clay Higgins and I'm sure scores of others could ratchet up hateful rhetoric in a public forum where, unlike message boards, it really does matter. Right here on this page is video evidence of the President, of the fucking United States of fucking America, saying, in public, that he doesn't care about right wing violence, but only left wing violence. Do you see why some people might be concerned? Also *bated
  12. Gonna have to disagree with your police work here, Lou, although I get the gist of what you're trying to say. Right here on this thread, there is verbatim evidence of at least three elected representatives of one side, Trump, Mace, and Higgins, being morons (to the extent they aren't actual morons). Edit to add, on this board because the evidence is in the other thread.
  13. The phrase leftist is almost exclusively deployed by Trump aficionados to people like me, who voted mostly GOP for 30+ years. When it was more meaningful, it was applied to actual leftists, like Sandinistas.
  14. And I have stated as much. The tangent of this thread was whether Reagan's "cult" really compares to the Trump "cult." It does not, regardless of similarities they shared, or more accurately how Reagan's actions trace to the environment we find ourselves in today. And the genesis of this tangent was my statement that a lot of MAGAts outright reject the GOP prior to Trump. A lot of Trumpists proudly declare that "I'm not a Republican." That was certainly not the case with Reagan.
  15. Did the poster you quoted say or imply as much?
  16. Incorrect. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. The second statement may be true, but it will not be a murder charge.
  17. As I believe bozo observed, "trying on costumes." He seemed to take the cosplay pretty seriously though. AP.
  18. An Indian dude, and self-professed Hindu, "talking to" an alleged Christian, about a Nordic pagan afterlife. Makes sense.
  19. It's absurd, but yeah they do on the false belief that it doesn't contain caffeine.
  20. Leave. Take your hateful bitter shit out of here.
  21. More facile legal analysis. Second, Justice Souter suggests today’s decision may have important ramifications for academic freedom, at least as a constitutional value. See post, at 12–13. There is some argument that expression related to academic scholarship or classroom instruction implicates additional constitutional interests that are not fully accounted for by this Court’s customary employee-speech jurisprudence. We need not, and for that reason do not, decide whether the analysis we conduct today would apply in the same manner to a case involving speech related to scholarship or teaching.
  22. Yeah, that makes sense. A lot of "incidentals" to give away LDS membership. And it's probably pretty hard to be a nominal Mormon in that part of Utah.
×
×
  • Create New...