Jump to content

Noozak

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    217
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Noozak

  1. 11 minutes ago, linux said:

    I am going to have to disagree while they pretty much had their recruiting class solidified around that summer the collapse clearly started before the ink was dry.
     

    Fall 2020 in an asterisk season they almost made the CFP.

    Summer 2021 Aggies on pace for a monster class that had this site spooked.

    Summer 2021 Texas joins the SEC <- Start of train wreck

    Fall 2021 Joke of a season with 4 losses (but had that Bama win) 

    Winter 2021/2022 Sign the #1 class

    Spring 2022 Jimbo had the spat with Saban

    Summer 2022 weak class was forming

    Fall 2022 Losing season, 6? game losing streak, App st.

    Winter 2022/2023 Weak class signed, Lost Ant Hill. bright spots was E-Rob DL recruiting and Owens flipping and covering up his Louisville tat 

    Summer 2023 stronger class than last year

    Fall 2023 Weak season with multiple loses Jimbo fired

    Fall 2023 Joke of a HC search, Stoops hired, fired, Elko hired

    Fall 2023 E-Rob goes to Syracuse and decides to take the players with him

    Winter 2023/2024 weakest class I can remember from them.

     

    Just increase the date timeline at the bottom and it still works perfectly

     

    2014ShameWeek7-2.png.2835903418105a6d7fd9e4d797dc4909.png

    • Hook 'Em 1
  2. 31 minutes ago, NoName said:

    he's been committed to Alabama for like 14 months and change. if he wanted to re-class and enroll at Bama it would have been the easiest thing ever and he could have done it and then dropped straight into bowl practices.

    ...but he didn't. which is a glimmer of hope that didn't exist before he announced his OV locations.

    I'll snort all sorts of hopium. It seems crazy he's visited 10+ times, reclassified, and hasn't signed anything to join bowl practices. I haven't seen many reports from the texas writers about his interest in Texas either. Just trying to make sure I'm not missing anything here.

  3. 2 hours ago, Hookem2147 said:

    Ewers would really have to ramp up his practice activity today for me to believe he’s playing based on what I just heard. Sounds like Murphy and Arch have still been taking the majority of the team reps Monday-Wednesday.

    So you're going to drop this shit and not tell us what you just heard? 

    • Haha 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, Laxtonto said:

     

    We are getting closer and closer to a world that to keep sports competitive we will need to impose rules about banning the use of real time AI during games as well… 

    Set up a videographer on the side line during the game and overlay it with your teams video feed recording of the all 22. Take the signs from the first drive and all 22 and let it run for 15 to 20 minutes in real time and see what spits out about play probabilities. While that is running do an additional run with the first 2 drives to refine the model, then 3 and ect. Most likely by halftime you have a large set of confirmed signs….
     

    This is something I could probably do myself (or at least assign some of my grad students to do) with minimal difficulty. Just need the realtime video and time stamps, plus a formation capture and play result catalog system and then something that can recognize either the boards or all the individual signal callers. The issue will be less about can it do it and more about processing time, data integration, and data management. The bottleneck won’t be cracking the code in real-time (very minimal sequences and limited unique inputs) as the processing time to find and match would be measured in seconds if not minutes. The time constraint would be the real-time video tracking system and how quickly it process.
     

    But in truth you could go low tech and do all the data capture by hand with GAs watching your feeds and get probabilistic solutions of codes every drive that should stabilize fairly quickly. The fully automated concept is cool since less people means more secrecy and potentially a faster answer, but in practice you need 4 GAs and a laptop and you could crank out models as quickly as they GAs input the data each drive.

    I've wondered why we haven't seen people do something even more simple than ingesting live data. With down, distance, quarter, time left, score differential, and whatever other features that are useful; can you readily predict what play someone is going to call? Is that prediction even useful? 

  5. 4 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

    It is. Sark runs all the inside zone stuff to set up his vertical passing attack to get TDs. Mac Jones went for 41 TD and 4 picks in it in 2020. Tua went for 33 TD and 3 picks in only 9 games in it in 2019. The offense is designed to get the QB one on one looks vertically for TDs

    I would be curious to see how many SEC defenses were playing a flyover defense every single week. Maybe not many because bama was able to run on people whenever they wanted. While at Texas sarks offense has been all about efficiency because we can't do that. Our passing and rushing production has been pretty close to a 50/50 split every year. It's also a big reason why Quinn has such a high completion percentage. He's elite at throwing the ball to any location on the field so it's really easy for us to exploit zone coverages and take check downs for 3-4 yard gains. Even this year Sark has been content to hold on to the ball and chew clock. He's not really shown any desire to sling the ball around like that as a head coach otherwise we would be scoring more than 40 points 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  6. 13 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

    The 13 passing touchdowns in this offense that's designed to maximize passing touchdowns. The horrible red zone conversion rate that I believe is last or nearly last in the big 12 that includes some bad teams and bad offenses. 

    Of course they'll go back to Quinn when he's able to play but he's been solid this year and in my opinion far from impressive. If he ever figures out how to be impressive it sadly will be in the NFL and not here. 

    We've seen this offense now for 3 years and you still think it's designed to maximize passing touchdowns?  

    • Hook 'Em 3
  7. 15 minutes ago, Sgt Hulk said:

    The same drugs that think a Sark led offense is going to score 50 points. That our all star group of receivers will be utilized properly and that our secondary isn’t that bad

    Not sure what else you expect from a group (including RBs) that averages 21 catches a game at 13 yards a catch. The offense has 13 passing touchdowns and 14 rushing touchdowns. It's not like we favor passing over rushing. Our problems are situational play calling, and average as grits interior oline play more so than the skill positions.

    • Hook 'Em 5
  8. Just now, ztejas said:

    You're right that's a nebulous comment and I left it ambiguous because I was pissed off. I was also hammered. I'm not intentionally misleading people or being a cunt. 

    When I say "probably not good enough to win it" I mean not good enough to win a national championship. When I say "let's see what Arch has" I mean next season. 

    That said, like I've already clarified, I think this team with Quinn is good enough to win it this season. 

    Then i think we’re on the same page

    • Hook 'Em 1
  9. 11 minutes ago, ztejas said:

    Holy shit dude read what I'm posting. I never said we should bench Quinn. You're the one making up that argument in your head. 

    What I'm saying is that Arch next season is probably going to blow a lot of you away. Quinn is fine. I actually think he's better than that - I think he gives us a decent chance at winning a national championship this season. Yes - this season. 

    I think a RS frosh Arch wins this game going away. I don't think he dicks around and throws two picks in the 1Q. I think he's that fucking good - and I think that the standard for QB play at Texas should be very high. 

    Vince doesn't lose this game today. Colt doesn't lose this game today. That's the fucking point. This is Texas. This isn't aggy or Baylor or Tech. You show up to win the fucking game. You don't show up and throw 2 picks in your first 9 attempts. That isn't what this is about. 

    Your mileage might vary. 

    What are you talking about? You literally said “let’s see what Arch has”. What is that supposed to mean? Any reasonable person would assume you’re talking about today/this season and not next year.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 2
  10. 24 minutes ago, ztejas said:

    I don't think Ewers is our ceiling. You have me fucked up.

    I think we can win a national championship with Ewers under center. This season. 

    I also think that we can upgrade at the position. I'll be shocked if Arch isn't better. I'm sorry that some of you get so fucking offended at that idea.

    The staff clearly thinks he isn’t better today. There is a clear difference between what ewers does for this team and Arch does for next years team. I hope to god Arch is better than Quinn. That doesn’t mean Quinn isn’t good? I’m not sure what you’re getting at here. We were talking about Quinn being good enough to win today, not Arch being good enough to win next year. Don’t move the goal posts 

  11. 3 minutes ago, OU Sucks said:

    How many potential points did they take off the board for us?  Quinn didn't lose the game for us, but doing things like trying to truck a defender when you're 5 yards short of the sticks and coughing up the ball isn't going to help.  If he slides there, he probably gets hit late and there's a 48% chance the refs call the penalty.

    This is a fair point. I’m not sure I have a good response for you. So many things contributed to the loss though. My point is that this is bigger than just Quinn. Defense SHOULD have stepped up, but didn’t. Special teams should have stepped up, but didn’t.  Clean up the mess in Texas wins by two scores. That’s what makes this shit so frustrating. 

×
×
  • Create New...