Jump to content

Gap03

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gap03

  1. 9 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

    I don’t know, maybe.  

    So how many of the sealed indictments in DC are from the SCO?  And when do they get unsealed?

    I'm also curious about the mystery company subpoena.  The SCO is still pursuing that but is somehow in a position to release the report anyway.  Does that mean that they have sufficient info to indict or release a conclusion about whoever was tangled up in that mess, and they're just pursuing info from the foreign govt. to put an extra nail in that person's coffin?  

  2. 25 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    This.  That's a new kinda stupid.  The problem is -- and let me get this straight -- that a special investigator was appointed to investigate a potential crime....before it had been proven that the subjects of the investigation committed a crime.  That's some top-notch reasoning there, DOTUS.

    tenor.gif?itemid=5958053

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, Biff Tannen said:

    7.5 years?  Out of a total possible 35?

    Hopefully Mueller is offended by the absurdity of this and decides to drag him back into court for other crimes.  Or, even better, refers something to a state AG so that Manafort can spend some time in non-country club prison.  

  4. 1 minute ago, Js1 said:

    The artwork alone is worth $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.  Remember that a lot of stuff in the White House rotates in and out of a 40,000 sq foot warehouse in Maryland.  Wouldn't be surprised if that warehouse ends up emptied between Election Day and Inauguration Day when no one is paying attention during Christmas/New Years

    Don't worry - he'll replace the art with his personal collection:

    Spoiler

    donald-portrait-1551281194.jpg?resize=76

    LX7QLPX7QVBSFNII2B6TELEI4I.jpg

     

     

  5. 53 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

    There's also the inherent presumption that a particular judge would be incapable of setting aside bias to rule in an impartial manner.  Now, I get it -- that takes some serious self awareness, not to mention a moral compass that a lot of us might not possess -- but it's not unheard of and it kinda fits the job description.

    I can see why Stone and his buds might be skeptical, though - case in point, this guy - 

    elle-kavanaugh-faces-comp-1538145080.jpg

    You reap what you sow, I guess.

×
×
  • Create New...