Jump to content

blutow

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by blutow

  1. 2 hours ago, CycleTex87 said:

    This. A late season conference championship game win trumps any early season loss.  Recency bias or not. 

    +1.  I don't think it's a guaranteed outcome either way, but I'd bet on Bama jumping Texas if they win out with a "mic drop" beat down of undefeated Georgia in CCG.  Despite being neutral field, people would give that fresh win the edge over a week 2 Texas win over Bama. That's was Bama with a QB making his ~3rd? career start before they got rolling.  Then you look at quality of loss and people will give the clear edge to Bama.  The head to head would still carry weight, but probably not enough to make up for the other headwinds.  

    Also, it seems clear from week 1 that CFP committee cares about how you win.  I struggle to justify Oregon's rating over Texas based on W/L and schedule.  But they are winning the beauty contest.  Their best win is against Utah (their only win against a ranked team).  We've got wins against ranked Alabama and Kansas (and maybe KSU if they work their way back in).  I get that the eye test matters, but I think our results are measurably better up to this point.  Besides the style points, the losses also matter and Oregon's loss is looking much better than ours (thanks again OU).  

  2. 23 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

    Well this is wrong seeing as our likely opponent is already at 15 and will likely win 3 more to get to the CCG.

    Yeah, just ball parking it.  Still, likely not in the top 10 with who they have left to play.  My point is that there is no path that makes our CCG a really big win against a top brand that is highly ranked.  OU crapping themselves removed that as a possibility.  Compare that to the possibility of OSU/Mich, Oregon/Wash, Bama/Georgia (not saying all those will be highly ranked, but at least there is a possibility).  Those CCG games will carry a lot of weight (much more than our week 2 win).  We really need PAC to self destruct before CCG or for FSU to lose whenever.  I think think it very likely we get a spot if we win out, but certainly need some help.    

  3. 8 minutes ago, Pescado_Rojo said:

    If we both win out, they will absolutely pass us

    Yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if they jump us in CFP selection this week, but it really doesn't matter.  If they win out, Bama almost certainly goes in over a 1 loss Texas.  Recency bias and SEC bias will trump the head to head.  And to be fair. Alabama/Milroe has shown a lot of improvement while Texas is struggling with injuries all over the field.  The best possible win Texas can have going forward would be CCG (best case against a ~15th ranked 2 loss team and it could be even worse depending on how things play out).   There are certainly scenarios where the SEC champ doesn't get a spot, but I think it's much more likely that ACC or PAC have a slip (or even B1G).  

     

          

  4. 3 hours ago, TexEx15 said:

    His delivery sounds just like Saban.

    I don't see the Saban comparison, I find Saban to be more direct rather than trying to be clever when he doesn't like something or someone.  That press conference was a non-stop passive-aggressive FU targeted directly at Jimbo.  I thought it was borderline petty and childish, you gotta love it.  I wouldn't want LK as a coach, but the guy is certainly entertaining.  I can't believe he'd be interested in coaching at ATM, but he certainly went out of his way to prop up everyone except jimbo.  I'm guessing that's more about highlighting Jimbo's "less with more" failures, but who knows.      

  5. 56 minutes ago, LonghornSean said:

    I highly doubt a scenario comes to pass with Texas and Bama both winning out, but if it does I guarantee you Herbie (and a few others) will be ranking Bama over Texas.

    It wouldn't surprise me to see Bama jump Texas as early as next week if we both look good this weekend.  Not saying it's right, but the Bama/SEC bias is still real and and a win over LSU is going to be perceived as a lot better than a win against KSU.  

  6. 54 minutes ago, alincoln said:

    Stalions is Michigan and his knowledge is Michigan's knowledge. 

    Exactly.  If they had just contracted him as a 3rd party, there could be some debate about who knew what (even though that debate would be a delusional farce).  Once they hired him, he became them and it's clearly against the rules regardless of who knew.  UM trying to make the case that other UM staffers didn't know how the signs were being "deciphered" might affect the severity of the penalty, but I'd be very surprised if there isn't a paper trail on these tickets/travel.  The level of organizational stupidity here is next level if the reports are accurate.  If you make a deliberate decision to cheat, you'd think they would put a little thought into how to cover their tracks if people get suspicious.  Maybe we'll find out that the $ transfer was hidden in some clever way, but I'm betting this is just a bunch of knuckle dragging coaches that wanted the signs and didn't think it through.   

    • Hook 'Em 2
  7. Sark was already lobbying the committee in his press conference today, making the case that Texas has the best win in college football this year.  Nice to see a coach pushing the message early and often, Mack was too soft about that stuff.      

    Already got picked up by ESPN, CBS, etc.  https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/38780889/steve-sarkisian-makes-texas-cfp-case-ahead-first-rankings

    • Hook 'Em 2
  8. 14 minutes ago, The Dog said:

    We get in over Bama all other things being equal. Road win at their place.

    Winning the head to head (early in the season) is far from a guarantee given the potential circumstances.  If they were coming off a CCG win over undefeated Georgia, they'd have a nice fresh win against a top ~3 team and their only loss would be early in the season against a highly ranked Texas team.  And our loss to OU isn't aging well and could get worse.  We'll have no wins against top teams late in the season, our resume is primarily Alabama in game 2.  The committee is all about "body of work", I think they'd pick Bama.  That said, I think it's doubtful Bama wins out.  Again, just win the games and we are 90% in, but not guaranteed in my opinion.  

    • Hook 'Em 2
  9. 16 minutes ago, JBJ said:

    The odds of a TD favorite across 5 games winning all 5 is only 20%.  FSU is the only team that will be over a TD favorite in their remaining games.  Every other team is near or below a 20% chance to win out.  It wouldn't be crazy to see 2 undefeateds, but it's certainly not a good bet.

    We do this every year.  There's like 13 reasonable contenders at this point of the season and close to all of them (9-12) will lose a game.   All you really have to do is not lose for a virtually guaranteed CFP spot.

    You are talking about the odds of an individual team going undefeated, not the odds that of having 2 undefeated teams.  I haven't look at odds on individual games going forward, just going off history.  Having 2 undefeated teams in the playoffs is a reasonable 50/50 bet.  In the last several years - 

    2022 - 2 undefeated

    2021 - 1 undefeated

    2020 - 2 undefeated

    2019 - 3 undefeated

    2018 - 3 undefeated

    Far from certain, but looking at the teams remaining and who that have to play, it's still say that is > 50% chance there are a couple undefeated teams at the end of regular season. 

      

  10. 18 minutes ago, immamac said:

    If FSU or Washington drop a game it's completely over for them on CFP if others win out. FSU has played a completely dogshit schedule, but they honestly look the most likely to win out. Michigan can drop PSU and beat OSU and still get in I think. 

    Oregon is probably more likely to win out than Washington.  I think there is a >50% chance there will be 2 unbeatens out of MU/OSO, GA, and FSU.  Assuming that happens and we win out, it will be a 1 loss beauty contest for the remaining 2 spots.  Our resume would have us in the mix, but far from guaranteed.  We really need both Washington and Oregon to lose a game prior to CCG and we need Alabama to keep winning.  If Bama wins out and beats Georgia in CCG, it would be really hard to leave out a 1 loss Texas when Bama would certainly be in.  

  11. 6 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:

    Were technically a national championship contender if we win out. 

    Absolutely, but that's why I said he needs to make us a consistent contender (and there is still a long way to go this year).  Even TCU can stumble into a great season when the stars align, we need a sustainable program that wins 10+ every year.  If Sark can get us to that point, we're in the playoffs most years and you get your shots at championships.  While I'm not yet convinced Sark is the guy, I like that he seems very focused on long term foundational stuff and I think he's pushing a style of football that lends itself to consistent long term success.  This isn't Herman using a QB as a battering ram to win games.  While I don't agree with some of the in game decisions, those are mainly noise in the big picture.  I'm trying to judge the guy at the game or even season level, which is ultimately what I care about.  And I personally think they are playing a style of football that's really entertaining to watch.  For all the folks saying that we're winning ugly, I really wonder if they watch college football.      

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  12. 6 minutes ago, Eskimohorn said:

    I also doubt it, but there’s a narrative floating around that Sark was treating this game like a scrimmage.

    I don't think it's scrimmage mentality, I think it's simply Sark being stubborn and doubling down on his beliefs and trying to establish program identity.  He wants Texas to be a program that exerts their will on opponents, smash them in the mouth and win the day (and all that crap that sounds cheesy, but is actually pretty important).  That high level agenda is really important, but that's a long game strategy (years sometimes) and you still have to play smart situational football in the moment.  I thought it was bat shit crazy not kicking those field goals to make it a 3 possession game, but I'm not the one who is going to get fired if Sark doesn't make Texas a consistent national contender within the next few years.  He seems to have a vision of what he wants Texas football to be and he's stubbornly sticking to it.  I'm not sure if that vision is right or wrong or if he's the guy to make it happen, but I like the commitment and consistency.  We've been wandering in the desert without a real identity for too long.  As much as some of the calls drive me crazy, Texas is playing a really solid and sustainable style of football in my opinion.    

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
  13. 10 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

    LSU is a paper tiger just like all of Brian Kelly's Notre Dame teams. Bama will beat them and they will be out for blood after what happened last year.

    Yeah, but they've shown the ability to put up some points and Bama's offense is inconsistent at best.  I think it will be a dangerous game for them.  Then they have Kentucky and Auburn (both away games).  I wouldn't bet against Bama in any of these, but I think there is a decent chance they drop 1.   

     

    As long as Texas keeps winning, it actually makes some of these other games more interesting.   I normally wouldn't give a fuck about most of these games, but when Texas in in the hunt for a CPF position I'll get pretty amped up for any game that has an impact.  

  14. 6 minutes ago, Kwix said:

    I don't get Oregon jumping us. Is beating Utah supposed to be a better win than bama? Is it just because their loss looks a little less bad after the OU loss? 

    Yep, there is no way Oregon jumps us today if OU wins against Kansas yesterday.  And it's also a timing thing.  Memories are short, recent games get much more credit than early season games.  Our best win of the year (unless we make the playoffs) will be a week 2 win.  Our best possible win going forward happens next week against a team barely in the top 25.  Would have been nice to knock off OU in CCG when they were sitting in the top 5 (or whatever).  At that point, you'd have 2 top 5 wins and no debate against other 1 loss champs.  I'm not as convinced as others that a 12-1 Texas gets in over a 1 loss Oregon or Washington.  Media has been propping PAC up all year and beating on Big12 (somewhat fairly).  Everyone will forget how bad SEC was OOC by the time decisions are made.    

    • Hook 'Em 1
  15. 29 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

    We are far more likely to see a 2 loss team in this year’s playoff than more than one undefeated team. 

    I have no concerns about a bunch of undefeated teams, I'm more worried about rankings between 1 loss conference champs if Texas is one of them.  But mostly I'm worried that we'll drop a game and make it all a pointless discussion.   

    • Hook 'Em 2
  16. If we win out, we could easily get left out over a 1 loss Oregon, Washington (depending on who they lost to) or Alabama. 1 loss ACC/B1G champ probably wouldn't jump us if Alabama keeps winning.  

    As much as I hate measuring "quality of loss", OU's glorious loss yesterday could come back to bite us.  If we had ended beating an undefeated OU in the CCG, our 1 loss would look better and we'd have a win again a top ~5 OU right at CFP decision time (timing is everything).  Now, if we win out and meet OU (or someone else) in CCG, we'll only have a single signature win - Alabama before they got their shit together (that will be the narrative/justification).  And our OU loss will look worse.  Texas would almost certainly be passed over by a 1 loss Alabama if they beat an undefeated GA in the CCG (again timing is everything).  Lots of football to be played, just win and see what happens.  

    • Drool 1
  17. 2 hours ago, Nicole44 said:

    Klatt’s main thing has always been the NCAA isn’t a governing body and is total ass. This is what happens when you don’t have a true authority. He also compared it like going 15 miles per hour over the speeding limit—you get caught you’re getting a ticket. Whether you think the speed limit is bullshit or not. I agree with him on the NCAA. 

    Yeah, lots of people speed and take their chances, but most try to be smart about it.  If someone blows through a school zone doing 80, they are probably getting a ride to the station.  The level of stupidity that UM appears to have exhibited here is pretty impressive.  Whether NCAA can or will do anything about it will be an interesting watch. 

    Paul Blart: Mall Cop - Boss letting you off early for the long weekend? See Paul  Blart: Mall Cop 2 in theaters this weekend! #BlartRidesAgain  http://sonypictur.es/Blart2Tickets | Facebook

     

    • Hook 'Em 2
  18. 1 minute ago, Frank Drebin said:

    I would think the head coaches and coordinators would want to know how the signs were obtained before trusting the intel was worth enough of a shit to use in a game.  That's just me though.

    Oh, I'm sure the SC DC knew how the signs were obtained, but there may not be a paper trail that proves that he knew.  So, if SC thinks he's a good OC, he probably keeps his job because they say he didn't know.  If they are looking for any reason to get rid of him, they fire him because he should have asked/known and SC is such an ethical school and all the crap.     

  19. 13 minutes ago, Laxtonto said:

    And I would also like to note that the DC at SC, if true, is gone…. Ain’t no way the SEC will let this type of contagion hop over to their playground. My guess is he is suspended (with pay of course) today…

    The DC could probably make a decent case that he didn't know how the signs were obtained.  Is it illegal for a UM coach to give a SC coach some info on signs that were obtained within the rules (as far as the SC coach knows)?  It all sounds wrong, but wrong and against the rules aren't always the same thing.  

  20. 7 minutes ago, UTEE97 said:

    It's not a third party when their own staff is funding the operation of obtaining the films.

    It's not really about who pays, but whether the folks paying should reasonably know what's going on.  A common corporate tactic for doing shady shit (bribes for gov't officials, price fixing, etc.) is to pay a 3rd party to do your dirty work and be smart about the paper trail (money passes hands to a BD consultant for non-specific tasks, etc.).  If done well, it can be hard to pin something back on the company.  That said, these coaches and athletic administrators are obviously not the sharpest knives in the drawer.  The fact that they employed this guy (and possibly directly reimbursed tickets and travel) and put him on the sidelines instead of keeping an arms-length relationship is beyond dumb.  I'm sure UM is trying to construct a story that they didn't how the guy was getting the signs, but good luck with that.   

  21. 33 minutes ago, cochamps said:

    That assumes that UM is in the playoffs.  Their schedule is back loaded, so that may be probable, but not a done deal yet.

    The most entertaining outcome would be watching the season play out and UM falling apart because their success was based on knowing the signs.  I assume there is no way they can continue doing it since they will be under a microscope.  

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...