Jump to content

Fud

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    9779
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fud

  1. And the #3s are mostly jaggy. If they view a WR at 42 as a potential difference maker, I think that’s on the table
  2. The room isn’t full if they like a guy. You typically roster 6-7, and only maybe four those guys are completely safe
  3. No chance Mitchell is there at 42
  4. No one is taking snaps right now
  5. Fud

    2024 NFL DRAFT

    It's pick 3, 4, or 5. You typically have to add a premium when it's a trade up for a QB. If NE wants a QB, they obviously aren't trading that pick. Everyone in the league/industry knows that LAC has been shopping that pick at #5, but Minnesota trading to #5 is risking QBs going 1-4, so it could be a trade up to #4.
  6. I don't fully agree with this because WR should have been on the table, but I would also add that there could potentially be a small run on QBs at the top of the second round too
  7. Fud

    2024 NFL DRAFT

    Kirk is better than Baker, but isn't a top five QB. We can thread the needle on this one if we try.
  8. For those freaking out about IDL
  9. You do this trade if you think your first round grades are gone by pick 23 (teams typically have anywhere from 10-20 first round grades), and you have a cluster of players tiered together where you're confident at least one will still be on the board at 42 There will still be very good players available at 42, and likely some at the premium positions Some of the players on this list in the 30s (or maybe even late 20s) will likely be there at 42 https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2024-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-3-0
  10. Time to game out who'll be available at #42..
  11. Fud

    2024 NFL DRAFT

  12. The Mixon contract is more of a "why was this needed?" than a "that's a bad contract!". I guess they wanted a known quantity for the next three years (they can walk away free after two years, and walk away with a medium sized hit after one year). He never fumbles, gets the yards blocked for him plus one, and at times creates yards that aren't blocked Draft him on your fantasy teams, he's going to be a workhorse
  13. Conner is adequate in pass pro at guard, but in the run game you have to game plan around him likely fucking up his assignment. I'm skeptical that he'd be adequate in pass pro at tackle He's good depth if he'll stick around for it. If he's beating our others in our "best five" on merit and not injuries, that's a really bad sign
  14. I don’t think DE is necessarily off the table. When in doubt, you can always add pass rushers
  15. They’ll sign a couple of guys with the money they didn’t spend on armstead and cobble together a rotstion, and it’ll be fine I don’t think this necessarily means they’ll go interior DL in the first if there are better players on the board
  16. Russinni didn’t mention houston, and this chronic guy says Houston didn’t give an offer
×
×
  • Create New...