Jump to content

pearlandhorn

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2,701
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pearlandhorn

  1. 2 minutes ago, NoName said:

    hey come on now - Mario Cristobal may not be good at hiring offensive coordinators...or defensive coordinators...or position coaches...or having a good scheme...or in game management...or using timeouts...or beating rivals...or developing players...or out performing expectations...but the guy can absolutely recruit!

    Jimbo and Mario...

    • Haha 1
  2. 11 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

    image.png.bfe2029a812e46d1fb91fd285a26c9b5.png

     

    If that's why, these guys may have set a new low in sportswriter idiocy.

    1. For honesty's sake, they should say they're rating players on their potential to play in the NFL. They're not rating them as college players.
    2. Plenty of great college players don't make it in the NFL. It doesn't diminish their performance as collegians.
    3. So, they are saying their own initial judgment about a player is swayed because Texas chose the player? "We were idiots to rate this guy so high. Texas taking him proves we're idiots. Thank you Texas and the NFL!"
    4. Fuck the NFL and focussing on it in a college football discussion. College football turning in to the NFL fast enough.

    I agree

    20 minutes ago, Rhinotx said:

    So based on lack of development of players by coaches that are no longer here. Makes total logical sense

    I agree

    30 minutes ago, Doc Daneeka said:

    The brilliance of lowering rankings purportedly because of people who aren’t even here anymore but apparently because of the logo is unassailable. 

    I agree

    38 minutes ago, Vermin said:

    So why even have recruiting rankings if the outcome is pre-determined?

    I agree

    44 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

    That’s science!

    It definitely is.

  3. 4 hours ago, Elmer_Fudd said:

    "Mike Elko has already shown that Sark, even with a playoff appearance, can't come and take the highly rated OL aggy commit.  If Sark can't pull this off under the circumstances, then what chance does he have against the Elk with the 25' recruits?  A fear is building in Austin, TX and this is just the start of big things that the Elk is about to do" - Looch.

    I know this is satire but Bravo. Really. Almost fooled me

  4. Simmons isn't going to come in and immediately start from day 1.  He's going to be introduced just like Anthony Hill and Derek Williams were this year.  Will he the most talented person in that room the minute he steps foot on campus?  Absolutely.  I'd imagine he's in the same playing time percentage as those two freshman by the end of his freshman year next year.

    • Hook 'Em 3
  5. 25 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:

    They like to overpay as a flex, they think it makes them look rich and powerful. So I wouldn’t be surprised. 
     

    and if you define the salary pool, there’s no reason to not use it all. There’s a reason car salesmen and mortgage people tell you the most you qualify for. 

    I believe they're paying that because no one would want to hitch their wagon to Mike fucking Elko.  Reminiscent to overpaying Sterling fucking Gilbert to hitch his wagon to Charlie Strong.

  6. 1 hour ago, Rickylovesweed said:

    This is the thought experiment. How many top 10 position coaches/coordinators will A&M have? Currently, maybe DL but I think that's a stretch. 

    Texas definitely has a top 10 OC (Sark), a top 10 DC (PK), a top 10 OL coach (Flood), a top 10 DL coach (Davis), a top 10 TE/ST coach (Banks), and a top 10 RB coach (Choice). 

     

     

     

    I'd even argue that the list stays the same when you say top 5 position coaches/coordinators.  Offensive playcaller?  Name 2 better ones than Sark. 

    • Hook 'Em 5
×
×
  • Create New...