-
Posts
14633 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
14
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Francisco 2.0
-
-
1 minute ago, Continental Op said:
The hell you say? Those people were cast from the mold of William F. Buckley, Jr.
I know, right? I bet Tahoe would welcome them with open arms at the monthly party meeting. Maybe one of them could bring a bag of donuts.
-
3 minutes ago, Chooky said:
This. This is the face of the modern Republican Party.
But in reality, these people are not Republicans. They were just looking for a voice to lash out, and Trump came to their rescue. Voting/supporting the GOP just goes along with their worship of the House of Trump. If he decided tomorrow that he would leave the GOP and form the Trump Party, and seek re-election as a Trumpocrat, these people would happily follow along.
-
1
-
-
-
This bitch should have never been elected, but carpetbagged off of her old man's name. She's just the worst.
QuoteOn a momentous day for Tribal Nations, Congresswoman Liz Cheney (R-WY), the House Republican Conference Chairwoman, stated that the successful litigation by tribes and environmentalists to return the grizzly bear in Greater Yellowstone to the Endangered Species Act (ESA) “was not based on science or facts” but motivated by plaintiffs “intent on destroying our Western way of life.”
QuoteOne of the largest tribal-plaintiff alliances in recent memory prevailed in the landmark case, Crow Tribe et al v. Zinke last September, when US District Judge Dana Christensen ruled in favor of the tribes and environmental groups after finding that the Trump Administration’s US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) had failed to abide by the ESA and exceeded its authority in attempting to remove federal protections from the grizzly. Tuesday, USFWS officially returned federal protections to the grizzly.
QuoteRemoving protections from the bear, revered as sacred to a multitude of tribes, would have left the grizzly vulnerable to high-dollar trophy hunts and lifted leasing restrictions on some 34,375 square miles. Extractive industry, livestock and logging interests are among those desirous of capitalizing on the area, a region comprised of tribal treaty, reserved rights and ceded lands.
Spoiler“So, in striving to protect our culture, our religious and spiritual freedoms, our sovereignty and our treaty rights – all of which are encapsulated in the grizzly issue – we are ‘destroying’ Cheney’s idea of the ‘Western way of life’?” questioned Rodgers. “I would remind the Congresswoman that at the time of the Lewis and Clark Expedition an estimated 10,000 grizzly bears roamed from the Missouri River to the Pacific Coast. That was all Indian Country. Now there are fewer than 2,000 grizzly bears and our people live in Third World conditions on meager reservations in the poorest counties in the US. Does she really want to talk about ‘destroying’ a ‘way of life’?” asked Rodgers.
“Unfortunately, it comes as no surprise that recent attempts by the Administration to remove protections for the grizzly, as well as blatant disregard for proper Tribal consultation, warrant our attention,” commented Congressman Joe Neguse (D-CO), who chaired the hearing on HR 2532. Rodgers’ written response to a question by Rep. Neguse traces contemporary wildlife management practices employed by the USFWS and the states back to the Doctrine of Discovery. The account, which has been widely praised by organizations including Sierra Club and Earth Justice, is posted in the Congressional Record (https://docs.house.gov/meetings/II/II13/20190515/109483/HHRG-116-II13-20190515-QFR003.pdf).
“That response is vital for our people. I urge everybody to read it. We must be aware of where, why and how the status-quo came to be and understand that these actions consistently undermine tribal sovereignty and disenfranchise our people,” said Lynnette Grey Bull, Senior Vice President of Global Indigenous Council, who also testified at the hearing.
Grey Bull resides on the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming, among Cheney’s constituents. Both the Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone Tribe passed official resolutions and issued numerous communications opposing the delisting and trophy hunting of the grizzly bear. The Northern Arapaho Business Council was compelled to issue a “Cease and Desist” letter to the Department of Interior “regarding consistent misrepresentations of the Northern Arapaho Tribe’s position on grizzly delisting.”
Cheney contends that, “the ruling that forced today’s action was both needless and harmful to the ecosystem, which is why I introduced legislation earlier this year to reinstate the original, science-based decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to delist the grizzly and prevent future court action on the delisting, returning management of the grizzly back to the state where it belongs.”
Tribal Nations, including the Oglala Sioux Tribe which petitioned for a Congressional inquiry into the influence of multi-national fossil-fuel corporations on FWS’s grizzly delisting decision, previously exposed the role of extractive industry in the process. USFWS engaged multinational oil and gas services group, Amec Foster Wheeler, for the peer review of its grizzly delisting rule that tribes and environmental groups deconstructed in court. Amec Foster Wheeler appointed Halliburton executive Jonathan Lewis as CEO in the same timeframe as USFWS contracted the company.
“That puts ‘harmful to the ecosystem’ into its true context,” responded Rodgers. “The Cheney family’s connections to Halliburton hardly needs elaborating upon,” added Chief Stan Grier, President of the Blackfoot Confederacy Chiefs. Grier and Blackfeet Chairman, Tim Davis, are at the forefront of the effort to stop the grizzly being delisted and trophy hunted in the Glacier National Park region, the heartland of Blackfoot Confederacy territory.
Cheney’s attempt to legislatively “prevent future court action on the delisting” was previously challenged by a coalition of tribes in testimony to the US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
“Any attempt . . . to legislatively nullify the Court’s ruling in Crow Tribe et al v. Zinke– to once again strip ESA protections from the grizzly bear – will, in addition to defying the Court, suborn the federal-Indian trust responsibility. Given that the Constitution states, ‘all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land,’ the rights of Indian tribes cannot be treated as ‘temporary and precarious,’ as would be the case if Crow Tribe et al v. Zinke was legislatively subverted,” submitted the RMTLC, the Great Plains Tribal Chairman’s Association and the Blackfoot Confederacy.
“There’s more chance of her father receiving the Nobel Peace Prize than her Grizzly Bear State Management Act reaching the House floor,” said Rodgers of Cheney’s bill.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Doc Sam Beckett said:
He never has to answer for his lies. If I were Donald, I'd tell the fucking rubes that not only did I end it, I reunited every separated child with their parents and fixed their home country so they can live in peace. There's more Donald portraits hanging over fireplace mantels in all those Mexican countries than there are in Merica.
Pretty much this. In addition, if I were Donald, I'd probably add the Mexican government reimbursed the US Treasury for any fees associated with reunification, the care/feeding/housing of the children while they were separated, and transportation back to Mexico aboard commercial aircraft.
I mean, the true believers will believe anything, so he might as well just stick in more than the tip.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Red Five said:
I feel like if you said to him “hey I don’t think you’re one of the five best quarterbacks in the world Donald”, he’d be like “actually I think that I am one of the five best quarterbacks in the world. A lot of people don’t know that but a lot of people are saying that I am.”Well, hell, it's already been immortalized:
-
3
-
3
-
-
These revelations (possibly) put this picture into a different context:
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html
QuoteJeffrey E. Epstein, the wealthy financier and accused sex trafficker, had an unusual dream: He hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his vast New Mexico ranch.
Mr. Epstein over the years confided to scientists and others about his scheme, according to four people familiar with his thinking, although there is no evidence that it ever came to fruition.
QuoteMr. Epstein’s vision reflected his longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence. Critics have likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding.
QuoteInterviews with more than a dozen of his acquaintances, as well as public documents, show that he used the same tactics to insinuate his way into an elite scientific community, thus allowing him to pursue his interests in eugenics and other fringe fields like cryogenics.
Lawyers for Mr. Epstein, who has pleaded not guilty to the sex-trafficking charges, did not respond to requests for comment.
SpoilerEven after his 2008 conviction on charges of soliciting prostitution from a minor, Mr. Epstein attracted a glittering array of prominent scientists. They included the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, who discovered the quark; the theoretical physicist and best-selling author Stephen Hawking; the paleontologist and evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould; Oliver Sacks, the neurologist and best-selling author; George M. Church, a molecular engineer who has worked to identify genes that could be altered to create superior humans; and the M.I.T. theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek, a Nobel laureate.
The lure for some of the scientists was Mr. Epstein’s money. He dangled financing for their pet projects. Some of the scientists said that the prospect of financing blinded them to the seriousness of his sexual transgressions, and even led them to give credence to some of Mr. Epstein’s half-baked scientific musings.
Scientists gathered at dinner parties at Mr. Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, where Dom Pérignon and expensive wines flowed freely, even though Mr. Epstein did not drink. He hosted buffet lunches at Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, which he had helped start with a $6.5 million donation.
Others flew to conferences sponsored by Mr. Epstein in the United States Virgin Islands and were feted on his private island there. Once, the scientists — including Mr. Hawking — crowded on board a submarine that Mr. Epstein had chartered.
The Harvard cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker said he was invited by colleagues — including Martin Nowak, a Harvard professor of mathematics and biology, and the theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss — to “salons and coffee klatsches” at which Mr. Epstein would hold court.
While some of Mr. Pinker’s peers hailed Mr. Epstein as brilliant, Mr. Pinker described him as an “intellectual impostor.”
“He would abruptly change the subject, A.D.D.-style, dismiss an observation with an adolescent wisecrack,” Mr. Pinker said.
Another scientist cultivated by Mr. Epstein, Jaron Lanier, a prolific author who is a founding father of virtual reality, said that Mr. Epstein’s ideas did not amount to science, in that they did not lend themselves to rigorous proof. Mr. Lanier said Mr. Epstein had once hypothesized that atoms behaved like investors in a marketplace.
Mr. Lanier said he had declined any funding from Mr. Epstein and that he had met with him only once after Mr. Epstein’s 2008 guilty plea.
Mr. Epstein was willing to finance research that others viewed as bizarre. He told one scientist that he was bankrolling efforts to identify a mysterious particle that might trigger the feeling that someone is watching you.
At one session at Harvard, Mr. Epstein criticized efforts to reduce starvation and provide health care to the poor because doing so increased the risk of overpopulation, said Mr. Pinker, who was there. Mr. Pinker said he had rebutted the argument, citing research showing that high rates of infant mortality simply caused people to have more children. Mr. Epstein seemed annoyed, and a Harvard colleague later told Mr. Pinker that he had been “voted off the island” and was no longer welcome at Mr. Epstein’s gatherings.
Then there was Mr. Epstein’s interest in eugenics.
On multiple occasions starting in the early 2000s, Mr. Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies, according to two award-winning scientists and an adviser to large companies and wealthy individuals, all of whom Mr. Epstein told about it.
It was not a secret. The adviser, for example, said he was told about the plans not only by Mr. Epstein, at a gathering at his Manhattan townhouse, but also by at least one prominent member of the business community. One of the scientists said Mr. Epstein divulged his idea in 2001 at a dinner at the same townhouse; the other recalled Mr. Epstein discussing it with him at a 2006 conference that he hosted in St. Thomas in the Virgin Islands.
The idea struck all three as far-fetched and disturbing. There is no indication that it would have been against the law.
Once, at a dinner at Mr. Epstein’s mansion on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, Mr. Lanier said he talked to a scientist who told him that Mr. Epstein’s goal was to have 20 women at a time impregnated at his 33,000-square-foot Zorro Ranch in a tiny town outside Santa Fe. Mr. Lanier said the scientist identified herself as working at NASA, but he did not remember her name.
According to Mr. Lanier, the NASA scientist said Mr. Epstein had based his idea for a baby ranch on accounts of the Repository for Germinal Choice, which was to be stocked with the sperm of Nobel laureates who wanted to strengthen the human gene pool. (Only one Nobel Prize winner has acknowledged contributing sperm to it. The repository discontinued operations in 1999.)
Mr. Lanier, the virtual-reality creator and author, said he had the impression that Mr. Epstein was using the dinner parties — where some guests were attractive women with impressive academic credentials — to screen candidates to bear Mr. Epstein’s children.
Mr. Epstein made no secret of his interest in tinkering with genes — and in perpetuating his own DNA.
One adherent of transhumanism said that he and Mr. Epstein discussed the financier’s interest in cryogenics, an unproven science in which people’s bodies are frozen to be brought back to life in the future. Mr. Epstein told this person that he wanted his head and penis to be frozen.
Southern Trust Company, Mr. Epstein’s Virgin Island-incorporated business, disclosed in a local filing that it was engaged in DNA analysis. Calls to Southern Trust, which sponsored a science and math fair for school children in the Virgin Islands in 2014, were not returned.
In 2011, a charity established by Mr. Epstein gave $20,000 to the Worldwide Transhumanist Association, which now operates under the name Humanity Plus. The group’s website says that its goal is “to deeply influence a new generation of thinkers who dare to envision humanity’s next steps.”
Mr. Epstein’s foundation, which is now defunct, also gave $100,000 to pay the salary of Ben Goertzel, vice chairman of Humanity Plus, according to Mr. Goertzel’s résumé.
“I have no desire to talk about Epstein right now,” Mr. Goertzel said in an email to The New York Times. “The stuff I’m reading about him in the papers is pretty disturbing and goes way beyond what I thought his misdoings and kinks were. Yecch.”
Alan M. Dershowitz, a professor emeritus of law at Harvard, recalled that at a lunch Mr. Epstein hosted in Cambridge, Mass., he steered the conversation toward the question of how humans could be improved genetically. Mr. Dershowitz said he was appalled, given the Nazis’ use of eugenics to justify their genocidal effort to purify the Aryan race.
Yet the lunches persisted.
“Everyone speculated about whether these scientists were more interested in his views or more interested in his money,” said Mr. Dershowitz, who was one of Mr. Epstein’s defense lawyers in the 2008 case.
Luminaries at Mr. Epstein’s St. Thomas conference in 2006 included Mr. Hawking and the Caltech theoretical physicist Kip S. Thorne. One participant at that conference, which was ostensibly on the subject of gravity, recalled that Mr. Epstein wanted to talk about perfecting the human genome. Mr. Epstein said he was fascinated with how certain traits were passed on, and how that could result in superior humans.
Mr. Epstein appears to have gained entree into the scientific community through John Brockman, a literary agent whose best-selling science writers include Richard Dawkins, Daniel Goleman and Jared Diamond. Mr. Brockman did not respond to requests for comment.
For two decades, Mr. Brockman presided over a series of salons that matched his scientist-authors with potential benefactors. (The so-called “billionaires’ dinners” apparently became a model for the gatherings at Mr. Epstein’s East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.)
In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif., where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be “charming” and to have “interesting ideas,” although they “turned out to be quite vague.”
Also at the Indian Summer dinner, according to an account on the website of Mr. Brockman’s Edge Foundation, were the Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page and Jeff Bezos, who was accompanied by his mother.
“All the good-looking women were sitting with the physicists’ table,” Daniel Dubno, who was a CBS producer at the time and attended the dinner, was quoted as saying. Mr. Dubno told The Times that he did not recall the dinner or having said those words.
Mr. Brockman was Mr. Gell-Mann’s agent, and Mr. Gell-Mann, in the acknowledgments section of his 1995 book “The Quark and the Jaguar,” thanked Mr. Epstein for his financial support.
However impressive his roster of scientific contacts, Mr. Epstein could not resist embellishing it. He claimed on one of his websitesto have had “the privilege of sponsoring many prominent scientists,” including Mr. Pinker, Mr. Thorne and the M.I.T. mathematician and geneticist Eric S. Lander.
Mr. Pinker said he had never taken any financial or other support from Mr. Epstein. “Needless to say, I find Epstein’s behavior reprehensible,” he said.
Mr. Thorne, who recently won a Nobel Prize, said he attended Mr. Epstein’s 2006 conference, believing it to be co-sponsored by a reputable research center. Other than that, “I have had no contact with, relationship with, affiliation with or funding from Epstein,” he said. “I unequivocally condemn his abhorrent actions involving minors.”
Lee McGuire, a spokesman for Mr. Lander, said he has had no relationship with Mr. Epstein. “Mr. Epstein appears to have made up lots of things,” Mr. McGuire said, “and this seems to be among them.”
-
Originally posted this to the Republican Party thread; after second thought, it belongs here:
-
Ah, yes. Since he isn't "my" religion, he really has no clue what's going on.
-
9 minutes ago, SmokeyTheBear said:
Meh, he wasn't going to win that state anyway is how I look at it.
It's terrible precedent, and if they do it, every state should. And frankly, every serious candidate for the office of President should reveal as much about their finances as possible. But all this will do is give the President something to point to out to the rest of the country that the socialists want him out of the picture. It's just another grievance he will use as a tool.
-
Like the Energizer Bunny, it just keeps going and going.
-
Quote
The irony of Donald Trump’s Twitter dominance is that, apart from his apparent mastery of the microblogging platform, he’s largely a luddite. He doesn’t use a computer, he’s likely never downloaded an app, and, as Politico reported Monday, he does all of his news reading (with the exception of Fox News chyrons) on paper.
He even has his staff print out the Drudge Report for him.
But the most eye-popping revelation from Politico’s dive into Trump’s reading habits is his decidedly analog method for “liking” tweets. First, a quick reminder of the accepted method for liking tweets: Click the heart.
QuoteNow, Trump’s method for “liking” tweets:
The president has even been known to sends printouts of tweets he likes. After he liked one Gaetz tweet, he had it printed by a staffer, signed it and requested that it be sent to Gaetz’s congressional office, where the now-framed tweet hangs.
Recalling Trump’s past as a hotelier, Gaetz said, “This is the proverbial Trump gift basket waiting for you in your suite or sent to you.”
QuoteThe president’s Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, has liked only three tweets that remained liked. One, from 2013, is from someone telling Trump he’s “hurt the GOP as much as anybody.” Another, also from 2013, is a tweet promoting an article about Trump wines. And the third, from 2017, is from a liberal who writes that Trump is “just not presidential material.”
Among the tweets that Trump has previously liked, but subsequently unliked, is one praising Rihanna for her work-life balance.
-
1 hour ago, RomaVicta said:
That was a little tone deaf, Alan.
But you see, he's a constitutional scholar.
-
1 minute ago, atomheartbevo said:
And unfortunately for Trump, he's not very original and can't think on his feet, and has the tendency to assume that what won before, will win again. Whoever is his challenger will know his weaknesses from 2016, plus all of the additional stuff (the Cohen stuff/coverups, the rape accusations, the Epstein stuff, etc.).
And nobody in the 2020 field of Ds is as much of a bogeyman now as Hillary was to his base in 2015-2016.
I wish I were as optimistic as you, but man....I just can't be.
Besides, whoever the Dems will nominate will fuck it up. They can run every ad during Fox News primetime hour showing how many coal mines closed during Trump's presidency (68, I believe to date), show pictures of him with a 14 year old supplied by Epstein, wave about a rape test kit finding Trump's DNA, show copies of his tax returns, whatever. Team D will try to talk policy and details and nuance in an attempt to counter whatever slogan Trump & Co. has came up with, and that's not how to beat a bully's ass. His support will not decrease, and in November 20, everyone will be banking on an electorate that historically just doesn't show up at the polls as the only salvation the country has. And this same electorate has had an additional 2+ years (in some states) of measures placed upon them in an attempt to actively dissuade them from voting.
Damn, I want to be wrong, and maybe I will, but Brisket's ledge looks pretty good.
-
1
-
-
Just now, atomheartbevo said:
Young Rs hate their crazy grandpa or uncle ranting in all caps on the internet just as much as the Indies and Ds.
I get that, but Young R's generally don't switch teams. They just become older disillusioned R's bitching about something that absolutely has no effect on their lives, but by God, they are going to vote to try to keep it from happening.
-
1 minute ago, atomheartbevo said:
He is flailing about trying to find his 2020 Hillary. If he had found an actual bogeyman that he felt rises to Hillary's level of hatred, we would have already seen it in action.
Oh, he will. I don't know who that person will be, but a year from now, that person will be the anti-Christ.
-
8 minutes ago, Loch Ness Monster said:
Can anyone defend Trump selling weapons to the Saudis?
Its disgusting what they've done in Yemen.
Shit, the Trump fan club can defend anything he's done. I honestly don't believe there's a line that he can cross now to those folk.
The only possibility is if he full on started referring to SEC country as full of toothless stupid ass slapdicks...and that might not even be enough.
-
36 minutes ago, Bartles said:
I'll be there in two weeks, fuck this... (but glad I found @BarkAndreFurry tagged here)
To be fair, across from the Mirage really isn't very.....special.
-
5 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:
Fox News has got to have one of the oldest viewer averages of any show.
They have had the oldest viewer averages for something like 20+ years now.
They keep cultivating younger audiences, some how. And those younger audiences become part of the oldest viewer average.
-
4 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:
so when he says the african american unemployment is the lowest in u.s. history, and "no president has come close to doing this before", what the fuck is he talking about?
it's like saying, "hank aaron has the most career homers, something no other player has come close to doing before."
Dude.
You are using logic and reasoning here in regards to something the President has stated as fact.
You have to throw that shit out the window and embrace whatever the fuck he decided to say on this day, and might add to/contradict the very same day, if you want it to make sense.
That's the magic. It doesn't have to make sense to you or I; only to the faithful followers of the House of Trump. That's who he's speaking to. So when he decides to throw out "facts" or make blatantly racist statements, he's speaking only to those who would do anything for him. He's not an American president (as if he ever was), he's a white Nationalist isolationist President and he only cares about his audience. That's it.
I fully expect him to toss out the N word on a tweet someday and it will barely move the needle, because of the roughly 12,000 other shit ass things he or his administration have said or done.
-
2
-
-
31 minutes ago, T’Boo Ted Marshall said:
So the guy went into the ladies room after she left?
Well, it's California, so it's one of those new-fangled bathrooms where anyone can just walk in.
-
1 hour ago, Incredulity said:
Just wait till Raiders games start.
1 hour ago, bigup2dahorns said:
Oh yeah. MGM said they will be hosting a massive tailgating experience at Mandalay Bay on game days. The bridge crossing over the highway to the stadium will be closed to just pedestrians on game day. It’ll be extra nuts.If there ever was a town built to cater to both the fans of a visiting team and the home team, it's Vegas. It's not so much what the NFL will bring to Vegas in terms of cachet; it's what the town will offer to the NFL. The 8 home games played there will be absolutely packed on game weekends, even with people who have no chance in hell of getting a game ticket. It's an automatic destination for fans of visiting teams, because A) easy access to the town from anywhere in the world, B) plentiful hotel rooms [God knows what the rates will be on home game weekends] and C) plenty of food, drink, pussy, dope, music, gambling, whatever to go along with the game.
-
On 6/1/2019 at 1:00 AM, ChiTownDoc said:
Bavettes. Easy.
On 6/1/2019 at 11:31 AM, Francisco 2.0 said:Going in late July. I'll report my findings.
Hi all. Reporting back. Bavettes is absolutely bitchin'.
I've eaten at Prime, Cut, SW, Gordon Ramsey's place at Paris, BLT, Charlie Palmer, etc. Bavettes is an automatic return visit. The crab cake appetizer was outstanding (probably larger than a 1/2 lb hamburger patty):
I had the 42 day dry aged bone in ribeye. Well worth it.
note: not my pictures
We were asked when we were seated if we had show tickets for later or something planned so they could pace the meal appropriately. Sure enough, it was 3 hours from seating to getting up to leave. The ambiance of the place is wonderful. Highly recommended.
As for the rest of the trip, typical. Had front row seats for Absinthe (yep, got picked on). People watching is always fun. Spotted a mid 20's man in a motorized wheel chair in Bellagio around midnight, and he had some kind of medical condition. Nothing wrong with that...but....
...his urine bag was strapped to his right shin. He was wearing shorts. The bag was half full.
Lot more "service" animals in the various properties now.
Saw a near brawl the Friday before the Manny Pacquiao fight in MGM. Was sitting in Lobby Bar and two groups were about to throw down. Security just descended out of nowhere.
Missus and myself have always rotated Vegas properties to stay at, but for some reason, have never really thought of Wynn or Encore. After this trip, wife wants to try one of these two next time.
-
1
-
Donald Trump 2019
in Cloak Room
Posted
"He talks just like us"