Jump to content

lilMAC25

Full Members
  • Posts

    3346
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lilMAC25

  1. You did when you interjected Saban into the discussion. Saban’s time at Michigan State is not analogous to Sark’s career. At all.
  2. It doesn’t matter, Sarkisian IS NOT Saban and never had the sort of coaching success that Saban already had by now at smaller weaker programs. Quit trying to compare the two.
  3. Are we back to the idiotic “BUT NICK SABAN” bullshit? because if you’re using a sample size of ONE out of thousands of collegiate HCs to try to prop up your argument, you’re making a singularly, spectacularly, utterly inane argument.
  4. No more fucking Candi in Jumbo’s office for PJ!
  5. Baker mayfield is incredibl……………………….…..ly shitty.
  6. I know it’s just Kansas, but we kicked the fuck out of em. Extremely satisfying win, even if it’s just Kansas.
  7. Oh, I’m not disagreeing with you.
  8. There’s a dude right now who is ballllllllls deep in that chicken.
  9. And his head coaching career is more impressive than who we actually hired. 🤦🏽‍♂️
  10. Iowa doesn’t churn. I’m not interested in being Iowa, are you?
  11. Except there’s a LOT more evidence that says Bijan/RoJo pops one vs Worthy and Quinn connecting on a deep ball. A LOT.
  12. 9 wins a year and competing in the CCG would make me an ecstatic fan
  13. What? Coaching absolutely matters. That’s the argument against Sark.
  14. This argument is NOT exactly damning the coach you think it is… Do you have any idea how many 10 win seasons Sarkisian/Dykes has had? Do you know how many 9 win seasons Sarkisian/Dykes has had? Do you know how many 8 win seasons Dykes/Sark has had? Do you know what Sark/Dykes career winning % is? Because if Dykes is a “known mediocre quantity”, then Sark is even more mediocre and I ain’t basing that on head to head.
  15. You have to keep coaches like retired on the job/failing at recruiting Mack and Strong around because of negative recruitin, haven't ya heard? no one ever even thought of negative recruiting Mack before 2010. 😂
  16. Good post, and I didn’t hear that about Flood. I like it.
  17. What? Mack got 15 or so seasons. Charlie got 3. Herman got 4. And we are back to the “shoulda kept Charlie” and “the next shiny thing” fallacies. We shouldn’t have kept Charlie. He fucking sucked. He was negatively recruited BECAUSE HE FUCKING SUCKED. Other coaches were telling recruits he would be fired, BECAUSE HE WAS THE WORST COAH IN TEXAS HISTORY. They could point to his obviously horrific record and say “he sucks, do you really want to play for such a terrible coach” and “he’s gonna be fired” because of his 7 loss seasons. Claiming otherwise is disingenuous at best and a flat out lie at worst. Sark was NOT a “shiny object” for which the Texas fan base (or even the administration) was grasping. Sark was a fallback hire. Thankfully, it turns out that the coach TEXAS Admin got can recruit (or maybe it’s NIL, doesn’t matter) and is well liked by players and within the program. Can he compete for a BigXii championship or even an appearance? That still remains to be seen. That is the minimum goal at TEXAS.
  18. Fuckin weird that you quoted me saying I wanted us to win the game, but then, You say a lot of stupid stuff, so…
  19. What a 1st half. Bijan is a damn stud.
  20. That was a shit call against Sanders. Just shit.
×
×
  • Create New...