Jump to content

Dolemite

Full Members
  • Posts

    1033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dolemite

  1. 11 hours ago, Nivek said:

    I have a toll bridge I need to sell.   You seem like the right kind of guy for this investment.  

    The reason Trump wanted to break the ties between NK and Iran is NK was providing nuke and missile technology to Iran because they needed the money.

    NK's reconciliation opens the door for that money to be replaced by aid and investment from the US. Now, NK has the best of both worlds. The regime gets to stay in power and they get a lot of money.

    No coincidence that the US pulled out of the so-called Iran Deal while NK was caving. 

    Now Iran is left hanging out to dry and are no doubt flustered about the whole deal. 

    Hopefully, they are pissed enough to actual the release the names of the people they bribed to get the deal done with Obama. I doubt if they will though. 

     

     

     

  2. Robert Mueller Has Been Botching Investigations Since The Anthrax Attacks

     

    Quote

    Mystery surrounds Robert Mueller and his investigation into Russia and President Trump. Some think he is the ultimate professional, others that he is a Democrat lackey, still others maintain he is working on Trump’s side.

    We can see how he works if we look at how Mueller ran his second-most important investigation as FBI Director. In September of 2001, an entity began mailing anthrax through the US Postal system, hitting such prominent targets as NBC and Senator Daschle’s office. The terrorist attacks killed five and left others hospitalized. The world panicked.

     

    Under Mueller’s management, the FBI launched an investigation lasting ten years. They now brag about spending “hundreds of thousands of investigator hours on this case.” Let’s take a closer look at Mueller’s response to understand the context of the investigation — who his people investigated, targeted, and found guilty.

    The anthrax letters began just a week after the 9/11 attack. While planning the airplane hijackings, Al-Qaeda had been weaponizing anthrax, setting up a lab in Afghanistan manned by Yazid Sufaat, the same man who housed two of the 9/11 hijackers. Two hijackers later sought medical help due to conditions consistent with infection via anthrax: Al Haznawi went to the emergency room for a skin lesion which he claimed was from “bumping into a suitcase,” and ringleader Mohamed Atta needed medicine for “skin irritation.” A team of bioterrorism experts from Johns Hopkins confirmed that anthrax was the most likely cause of the lesion. Meanwhile, the 9/11 hijackers were also trying to obtain crop-dusting airplanes.

    So how did Mueller’s investigative team handle the case?

    Trump-Russia: Not Mueller's First Botched Investigation

    Quote

    Controversy surrounds Robert Mueller and his investigation into the Trump-Russia collusion mirage.  Some maintain that he is the ultimate professional dedicated to following the truth, but others say he is a political hack.

    There is no need to wonder about how Mueller operates.  His history has made it quite clear.  One needs only to study his actions as FBI director when he managed the FBI's most important investigation ever.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/trumprussia_not_muellers_first_botched_investigation.html

    • Fuck You 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

    The indictment on the Russians was more of a public service to increase awareness of what the Russians were actually doing.  It’s was a public outing that went beyond the IC report that came out a year ago that also specifically called out the Internet Research Agency.

    All the Russians named in the indictment probably got fucking medals and sports cars back in Moscow.

    Maybe some of that uranium money.

  4. So Iran is threatening to expose who they paid off to get the billions in cash in return for a supposed Iranian deal that was never actually signed. 

    Is he just is trying to keep his name from being exposed? He knows that the "deal" (that never existed) is "history" and it can't be saved. Why else would he be scrambling so hard?

    People who play with fire, get burned, or something like that.

     

     

  5. Russian Collusion Trial Is on - Mueller May Be the First Casualty

     

    Quote

    McCarthy called Mueller’s entire indictment an “unforced error.” “One thing you never want to do is to indict in a case that you’re not prepared to try,” McCarthy said.

    Mueller requested a delay for Wednesday’s hearing and claimed Concord had not been properly served notice.“Until the Court has an opportunity to determine if Concord was properly served, it would be inadvisable to conduct an initial appearance and arraignment at which important rights will be communicated and a plea entertained,” Mueller’s lawyers filed in federal court.

    But Concord opposed the motion. “The Special Counsel is not entitled to special rules and is required like the Attorney General to follow the rules of the Court,” Dubelier stated in his response to Mueller.

    U.S. District Court Judge Dabney Friedrich agreed with Concord and rejected Mueller’s request for a delay in the trial without comment, which led to Wednesday’s arraignment.

    Concord wants a “speedy trial” as provided by federal law, the company’s lawyers also repeated Wednesday. The case will resume July 9.

     

     

     

     

    http://thegoldwater.com/news/25836-Russian-Collusion-Trial-Is-on-Mueller-May-Be-the-First-Casualty

     

  6. 20 minutes ago, DixonHur said:

    Then why aren't they dismantling them?  You don't find it convenient that the one site they're "dismantling" just happens to be the one that's already been destroyed?

    Not to mention they already have working nukes and ICBMs.

    If Trump negotiates the verifiable destruction of all NK nuclear warheads, material, and weapons development, then I'll be the first to say he deserves the Nobel Peace prize.  Until then, nothing has changed other than the promise to destroy what's already been destroyed.

    It's like if after my house fell off a cliff I promised not to live in it again.

    Don't get your point. NK has been heathens for 60 years now since they broke their toys they want to give everything up?

    Trump's objective is to break the ties between NK and Iran. NK was the weak link because its people are starving and the country is broken. Now with NK and Iran separated with NK no longer cooperating with Iran and their nuclear ambitions then Iran will give it up too. 

  7. 9 hours ago, RayDog said:

    It was nothing he did. NK changed strategy after they accidentally destroyed their nuclear test site.

    They have other sites if they wanted to develop them. And to say Trump had nothing to do with this is ridiculous. Especially coming from someone with your abilities. 

  8. I have watched this 3 times. This is the third time that I have posted this video on this site. For those who are seriously interested in the middle east please watch this all the way through and see how relevant this is in retrospect, considering the changes in Saudi Arabia, and the annulment of the Iranian deal.

    Iran is coming down and peace is coming to the middle east, much quicker than most can imagine.

     

  9. About That FBI ‘Source’

    Quote

    The Department of Justice lost its latest battle with Congress Thursday when it allowed House Intelligence Committee members to view classified documents about a top-secret intelligence source that was part of the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. Even without official confirmation of that source’s name, the news so far holds some stunning implications.

    Among them is that the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation outright hid critical information from a congressional investigation. In a Thursday press conference, Speaker Paul Ryan bluntly noted that Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes’s request for details on this secret source was “wholly appropriate,” “completely within the scope” of the committee’s long-running FBI investigation, and “something that probably should have been answered a while ago.” Translation: The department knew full well it should have turned this material over to congressional investigators last year, but instead deliberately concealed it.

    House investigators nonetheless sniffed out a name, and Mr. Nunes in recent weeks issued a letter and a subpoena demanding more details. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s response was to double down—accusing the House of “extortion” and delivering a speech in which he claimed that “declining to open the FBI’s files to review” is a constitutional “duty.” Justice asked the White House to back its stonewall. And it even began spinning that daddy of all superspook arguments—that revealing any detail about this particular asset could result in “loss of human lives.”

     

    This is desperation, and it strongly suggests that whatever is in these files is going to prove very uncomfortable to the FBI.

    The bureau already has some explaining to do. Thanks to the Washington Post’s unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes’s request deals with a “top secret intelligence source” of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S. citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe. When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people who appear to be average citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy for the agency. Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some capacity with the Trump campaign.

    This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance warrant against Carter Page, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that its supporting information came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Now we find it may have also been rolling out human intelligence, John Le Carré style, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

    Which would lead to another big question for the FBI: When? The bureau has been doggedly sticking with its story that a tip in July 2016 about the drunken ramblings of George Papadopoulos launched its counterintelligence probe. Still, the players in this affair—the FBI, former Director Jim Comey, the Steele dossier authors—have been suspiciously vague on the key moments leading up to that launch date. When precisely was the Steele dossier delivered to the FBI? When precisely did the Papadopoulos information come in?

    And to the point, when precisely was this human source operating? Because if it was prior to that infamous Papadopoulos tip, then the FBI isn’t being straight. It would mean the bureau was spying on the Trump campaign prior to that moment. And that in turn would mean that the FBI had been spurred to act on the basis of something other than a junior campaign aide’s loose lips.

    We also know that among the Justice Department’s stated reasons for not complying with the Nunes subpoena was its worry that to do so might damage international relationships. This suggests the “source” may be overseas, have ties to foreign intelligence, or both. That’s notable, given the highly suspicious role foreigners have played in this escapade. It was an Australian diplomat who reported the Papadopoulos conversation. Dossier author Christopher Steele is British, used to work for MI6, and retains ties to that spy agency as well as to a network of former spooks. It was a former British diplomat who tipped off Sen. John McCain to the dossier. How this “top secret” source fits into this puzzle could matter deeply.

     

    I believe I know the name of the informant, but my intelligence sources did not provide it to me and refuse to confirm it. It would therefore be irresponsible to publish it. But what is clear is that we’ve barely scratched the surface of the FBI’s 2016 behavior, and the country will never get the straight story until President Trump moves to declassify everything possible. It’s time to rip off the Band-Aid.

     

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/about-that-fbi-source-1525992611

  10. Europeans are simply pissed that they will lose money as the US pulls out and reintroduces sanctions, and forces our "allies" to do the same. How will the US get the leverage to do that? Tariffs. Countries that don't play along will have tariffs imposed. 

    My guess is a good deal of the $150B in cash Obama gave Iran was funneled to European thieves that never complied with the sanctions, to begin with. Fuck Europe. 

    Europe racks up billions in deals with Iran now that sanctions are lifted

    Quote

    Europe is racking up billions in deals with oil-rich Iran as its president, Hassan Rouhani, makes a goodwill tour less than two weeks after the lifting of international sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

    Iran is looking to boost its economic ties to the West now that it is allowed to negotiate business deals as a reward for complying with curbs on its nuclear program.

    Here are details of some of the lucrative agreements:

    • France’s Peugeot-Citroen announced a deal with Iranian automaker Khodro on Thursday to produce 200,000 cars a year in Iran. The deal, which will see the first cars produced in 2017, is worth $436 million, Peugeot-Citroen said.

    • French energy company Total said Thursday it will sign a deal to buy crude oil from Iran, AFP reported.

    • Airbus will deliver 118 passenger planes to Iran Air, as well as provide pilot and maintenance training, Airbus announced Thursday in Paris.

    • France’s state rail company SNCF signed a deal with its Iranian counterpart, La Tribune reported.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/01/28/irans-rouhani-gathers-more-deals-france/79452784/

  11. Brooks on Tax Bill: Seems Like ‘What the Trump People Told Us Would Happen Is Happening’

    Quote

    On Friday’s “PBS NewsHour,” New York Times columnist David Brooks said that the GOP tax bill is working better than he thought it would and the evidence “seems to be that what the Trump people told us would happen is happening, that companies are reinvesting the money.”

    Brooks stated, “I was against the Trump tax cuts. But the early evidence is that they’re working better than I thought. And so, in the first quarter, among S&P companies, capital expenditures are up 39 percent. That’s a seven-year high. That’s far higher than a lot of us thought. Stock buybacks, which is just giving people — to shareholders, that’s only 16 percent. So the evidence from just the first quarter seems to be that what the Trump people told us would happen is happening, that companies are reinvesting the money. … And so, it’s important to oppose what’s opposable and what’s reprehensible and offensive. And we’ve been doing that, as I say, for three years. But it’s also important to see reality. And the more serious opposition will, frankly, be on disastrous policies or not disastrous policies.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/05/05/brooks-on-tax-bill-seems-like-what-the-trump-people-told-us-would-happen-is-happening/

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  12. On 5/3/2018 at 9:53 PM, RPM said:

     

    Philip prevents the extraction in Chicago which is the final straw for The Center and they order Elizabeth to kill Philip. Paige gets wind and tries to stop Elizabeth. Elizabeth kills Paige, Philip kills Elizabeth. Renee kills Phillip and makes it look like suicide. 

    Good times

     

     

    1

     

  13. On 4/4/2018 at 2:43 PM, F250 said:

    She is an Okie. I've never met someone from there that didn't claim to have native American blood. It's a non-issue.

    No kidding about the odds of having native american genes. She should take a private DNA test to see for sure and then make it public, assuming it shows the heritage. 

×
×
  • Create New...