Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    20141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. @ChiTownDoc may be down another Rolls Royce.
  2. Because your brain is broken and it is true.
  3. And what you'll be left with is that the average white guy under 45 is still better offer off, statistically, than pretty much anyone else (basically except Asian males).
  4. Significant is an exaggeration. Possibly a significant one.
  5. She bating someone, that is for sure.
  6. JT method?
  7. what about her butt?
  8. Successfully apparently.
  9. How you doing?
  10. I'm going to be honest. I have zero idea of what that means. And I'm really really really happy that I do not.
  11. What if - and believe me this is hypothetical - but what if you were offered some kind of a stock option equity sharing program. Would that do anything for you?
  12. @Anastasis thinks this is all there is to see.
  13. I disagree as do the statistics
  14. Come on man. You know that half of the state's Medicaid payments being fraud is an absolutely absurd claim. As an officer of the court, you know that is an absolutely insane allegation without substantial evidence. Read that release and tell me you actually believe they have any. They did the most cursory of reviews of the data and came up with ridiculous conclusions.
  15. As far as I know, @linux and @Nivek are different people.
  16. Yeah. I'm calling bullshit. From the release, it sounds like they are using some pretty skin level data analysis.
  17. I'm in the target cohort (Chinese heritage notwithstanding). I haven't seen anything resembling the unfair plight of the millennial white male lawyers. But I also don't doubt that some fields and certainly some particular companies are seeing something like that. And, for instance, I'm not convinced that the tech industry is seeing that because of DEI rather than because other countries have more highly prioritized STEM education.
  18. The article is worth a read and makes some valid points, I think particularly for the industry it talks about. I think the problem stems from taking short cuts and trying to speed run into diversity through new hires.
  19. Just to be clear, I wasn't doing that. One could see this as an attempt to lessen competition and protect their own status rather than a true belief in the values of diversity and inclusion.
  20. I agree that the defense had 1 bad game in that entire season. I've seen absolutely zero indication that this is a schematic flaw with Muschamp's defenses as opposed to a single bad game. Why are you basing everything on this single game? If this is your standard, you must think PK was an absolutely terrible d coordinator.
  21. Muschamp's defense aren't "completely irresponsible" either, so I'm not sure your point.
  22. Some of this is the danger of trying to make quick changes. When a company states of a goal of diversifying in say three-years rather than gradually, you're necessarily going to lock out others from the less favored pile. But there are some things in his statistics that still reek of privilege. For instance: Non-Hispanic white men (whom I presume his article intends to address) only make up ~28% of the population. I get that his point is that those in culture industries didn't move elsewhere, but he also seems to be implying this unfair effect his plaguing other industries too. I'm not convinced of that. I'll also note that he appears to be ignoring a pretty significant data issue: unknown race/ethnicity is common and prevalent choice in the data. And frankly many people that may be described as "white males" when looking at them may be claiming other ethnicities from their family background. I look white (mostly). But my grandmother was from China, and I often rotate between putting Asian, White, and prefer not to say on surveys.
  23. The theory is you get the big negative play and that stops the drive. You play conservative after getting it. OU is literally in the playoffs with a completely dysfunctional offense because it runs that kind of defense. Again, the 2009 was an elite defense, pretending otherwise is stupid. Pretending Muschamp isn't a great defensive coordinator is stupid.
  24. He was only involved with the true "late Mack era" in the 2010 season. The 2008 and 2009 defenses that he coached were very good. 2010 was just a broken team. There was nothing Muschamp was going to do to fix it. You're focusing on one game. That's ridiculous. It is possible for very good defenses to have a bad game. The defense didn't allow more than 24 points at any other point in the regular season. Texas was #6 in DFEI in 2009, # 3 in total defense, #12 in scoring defense, #1 in rushing defense, #10 in pass efficiency defense, gave up an average of 251 yards per game and 3.8 yards per play. Thinking that defense was anything except very fucking good is fucking stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...