Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Total posnobe unless he’s too dumb to realize how it came off.  But this guy is always a victim.   Suing a school because he’s an alcoholic.  

For sure. The response should have been “PK is 1A and muschamp is 1B, Texas will significantly miss PK. He’s been amazing. I wish him the best. Muschamp is going to help us not miss a beat. He’s a high energy coach, a former HC who will take care of business. He fielded some elite defenses last time he wore the burnt orange, I’m excited for next season. Next question” 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Thatguy said:

Whoa now. I mean we all like PK but his side of the ball was just as much a problem THIS season. Sans OU, that Florida- Arkansas run was not good defense. It's not just about points scored, it's that you couldn't put the lid on teams when you needed to. It wasn't that long ago that 3rd and PK was a running joke. We were truly solid defensively for a single year, largely based on personnel. We weren't doing anything special schematically. 

Again, Champ hasn't been calling games for a good minute so things may not work out, but when he was here it was obvious that dudes understood their assignment, played fast, and aggressive. We played some exotics too with split field coverages. Mainly though, when it was time to man up and get after it we did. What it looks like is Sark wants someone he can give full autonomy to on their side of the ball and he can focus more on offense. Georgia has that with Mike Bobo.  

You and others continue to miss the point of the post. Go back, read mine then read yours.

The move had the exact desired effect. Sark gets to keep his shittastic GM and OL coach and everyone is talking about the defense which only went downhill when Akina was brought in. Who's decision was it to bring on Akina? That question is not really the point the point is we will get the exact same bullshit on offense we have and there was zero indication or any evidence provided that Sark was putting energy into the defensive side. Thats the new narrative. 

I'm sure we'll continue to ignore the real issue in our discussions and continue to talk about Muschamp who was co-DC before he moved off. People keep forgetting that reality.

Advantage Sark and his ego. I'm done with the topic as the results vs OSU in the first game will tell the tale.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...