Jump to content

AG Matt Whitaker - Should Obama have just sat Merrick Garland?


horn4life

Recommended Posts

I honestly thought that if Obama hold out democracy sacre he simply could have sat Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court.  Simply saying by doing nothing, the consent was implied by the Senate.  Now that would be a constitutional shit show, but of course it would have at least been honest. 

IF---- you are arguing Whitaker is a fit and legal appointment, I would like to hear your arguments ON PRINCIPLE (lawyers you guys fight it out legally) why Garland needed any more Senate approval than Trump(GOP) is suggesting is OK for the acting AG, Whitaker? (a actually mistyped Shitaker, but I am not a child, so I edited it)

I know this will devolve, and I know it's crazy in a way to ask most Pubs about prindiples, unless the word is written on Gumby, (look it up rug rates) but still thought I would pose the question and hear waht fox news was droning...

Link to comment
Share on other sites



×
×
  • Create New...