
SL Xpress
Full Members-
Posts
4475 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
SL Xpress last won the day on August 7 2021
SL Xpress had the most liked content!
Reputation
9359 Surly 1%About SL Xpress
-
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Forget fade routes. I like deep pitches to the running back running to the pylon against very fast defenses. THAT is a recipe for red zone success! -
That said, there are few schools in compliance from a scholarship perspective. Some, like Oklahoma State, are far off the numbers. The only enforcement mechanism for Title IX is the court system. There's no regulatory body - state, federal, or a third party like the NCAA or conferences - enforcing the federal law when it comes to scholarship opportunities. And while Title IX isn't about compensation, there are still lawyers who are filing suits that say schools administering NIL to athletes directly should be complying with Title IX statutes. Whether I agree with that stance or not, the lawsuits are being filed. It's not necessarily about the merits of each case. It's about how much of a threat it can be to the NCAA so they're forced to settle rather than risk a judgement in court.
-
Yes. The $20.5 million is supposed to be for the entire athletic department. For example, it's been said the Big East will have a competitive advantage in basketball because many of their programs do not field football teams, so they can theoretically use more of the $20.5 million to fund their basketball roster. There are a metric fuck ton of lawsuits being filed against the NCAA. Think about how much the behavior is being incentivized. As has been posted above, the House settlement attorneys are set to pocket $750 million. That's without having to actually go to trial. It's sharks circling chum in the water. The NCAA has shown they no longer have any appetite to go to court on just about anything resembling player compensation, because they know they will lose. So it's just a series of settlements that governs collegiate sports right now. Currently the three biggest litigation avenues are student employment classifications (some of these NIL contracts sure sound like employment contracts to me as a non lawyer), Title IX, and any kind of limitation to NIL compensation. Basically, the whole point of the settlement for the NCAA and its members in the first place. The NCAA and the member schools are hoping for legislative relief from Congress and/or the POTUS. Everyone understands the House settlement provides about as much cover for college athletics and is just as workable as using an umbrella made out of tissue paper. The real point of the House settlement is to take it to Congress and use it as an example that they're trying to create some kind of sense out of the chaos, but they need help.
-
Sub-Educated Cretins: The SEC screenshot mega-thread
SL Xpress replied to SimkinsMan's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
A couple of years ago I had some regular interactions with a fairly fanatic Georgia fan who was questioning whether Texas had what it took to be competitive in the SEC. This was after Sarkisian's second season so it was a legitimate question if someone didn't know anything other than what they watch on television. I explained programs have to have the right coach, and Texas had been through a dry spell with late Mack, then Strong, then Herman, and the jury was still out on Sarkisian. But if he didn't work out we'd fire him and go after our next candidate until we found the right guy. But in terms of institutional commitment there's no issues right now, so it's simply a matter of time before we find the right guy and when we do he ain't leaving to go anywhere else. And maybe Sarkisian is that guy. Jury is still out (I should be clear I'm talking about two years ago). And then I turned on him and told him I found it rich that as a long time Georgia fan he's acting like it's always been the way it is right now with Kirby Smart. They've gone through a series of coaches since Vince Dooley who were nothing to get excited about, and frankly Dooley wasn't all that special. Good, not legendary or anything. Mack Brown was a way better coach than Dooley. Kirby Smart is by far the best coach they've ever had. But suddenly they're acting like they're entitled to their success because they're Jawja. They're making fun of Miami who was nothing before Schnellenberger, but the Hurricanes were demigods on the gridiron for 20 years, through 4 different head coaches - Schnellenberger, Johnson, Erickson, and Davis, before Coker inherited a stacked team until he had time to run the program into the ground. Georgia has never had a run like that. Yet another SEC program that's allowed Alabama to carry their water and then ride on the Crimson Tide coattails, but act like they somehow can claim partial ownership. Just some more "SEC! SEC!" troglodytes as far as I'm concerned. It's too bad I don't interact with that group any more. Of course, he'd still crow about the head to head victories from 2024, but I feel like Georgia fans better cling on to those wins from last year as closely as possible, because IMO there's a new sheriff in town.- 930 replies
-
- 16
-
-
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
If Barry Switzer wore that tie I'd hope he'd use it later that day to commit auto asphyxiation. It is a good deed, though. Apparently a couple of the victims were from my church, although I didn't know them. The church held a series of memorials over the past week. No one can remember the church being that packed. Thousands came to each service, and while it's a good size church, we're not equipped to handle the numbers that came to each memorial service. In certain parts of the Christian community in this state - which Taafe is openly a part of - this event has seemed to hit in a very personal way. I don't blame him for wearing the tie. I think it's a nice way to recognize the tragedy and keep things in perspective even in the midst of SEC media days. The Aggies are complete goobers. -
This is the one I wanted the most. Ever since we got Brian Robison as a somewhat underrated defensive lineman I've been enamored with significant shotput distances as an indication of explosiveness. Not exactly a brilliant insight. Robison also had a stupid vertical jump which he used to great effect on blocking field goals and extra point attempts. Robison also wasn't James Johnson's size. Still, once I saw those shotput numbers - plus everything else mind you - I really hoped we could somehow add him as part of the class. I love love love this commitment.
-
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
The plus in LGBTQIA+ is for cat lovers.- 9607 replies
-
- 14
-
-
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
-
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Using that .gif with Oregon involved in the recruiting is like posting a video to Jump Around with Wisconsin as the competition. Cheeky. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Don't forget he loves Galveston. LOVES IT! -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Well, they changed the state law in 1999 with Senate Bill 89 to help prevent another Kingwood scenario. In honor of the thread, Houston would now have to "recruit" an area in order to annex them. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Technically League City is right next to Houston. It's not the same as Georgetown is to Austin, because Austin hasn't aggressively swallowed up the neighborhoods next door to it. When Houston annexed places like Clear Lake, Alief, and Kingwood, it made the places next to it very close. League City abuts the city of Houston in the areas it annexed in 1977. I doubt there's another major city in the United States that has more aggressively swallowed up its ETJs. I know there isn't one in Texas. If you look at DFW, Dallas is landlocked by all the suburban towns around it. It can't grow. Houston made sure they weren't going to have the same issue. Against those neighborhoods wishes, at least in the case of Kingwood and Clear Lake. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Shipley's. GTFO with your Dunkin Donuts. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
I see this kind of post all the time. Like a message board is supposed to be some kind of hive mind. I see it from content creators who depend on engaging with their audience, then blame the audience for demanding contrasting actions on the part of the content creator. I mean, I see it from all segments of the population regarding all sorts of things. There can be a group that thinks Texas should be fiscally responsible in terms of their overall budget, their budget within positions, their budget with current players and upcoming retention --- contrasted with their budget for the acquisition of new talent. And then there can be an opposing segment that so desperately wants the dopamine hit from a talented teenager creating validation and affirmation for their favorite college sports team that they excitedly wish for other people to spend a small fortune to get the kid to say yes. People can hold contrasting opinions. Within the same person, frankly. One of the things that makes people most interesting to me is when they can simultaneously feel strongly in support of two opposing sides of the same position. It happens to me, too. But mostly I think it's a group of people who are very comfortable with spending someone else's money with no real limitations, and then a group of people who hope Texas has a plan they're trying to follow in terms of roster payroll. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
We need to step away from the jump to conclusions mat. There is no way to accurately speculate what the future is going to bring other than it's going to be very different than what it is now. Acting is if this is the final form of college sports - and college football specifically - and even more specifically, college football recruiting - is silly. Eventually there will be some kind of federal legislation, because that's the only avenue that can bring some resemblance of stability. Until then the whole ecosystem is going to be whipsawed from one direction into another based on the most recent court cases/settlements, new state laws passed to give the local programs a competitive advantage, and how different programs find ways around various restrictions. But acting like what has been going on the last few weeks is a harbinger of what the future will look like is silly. At the end of the day any sales pitch needs the opportunity to get your foot in the door. Relationships still matter. They always will. Success on the gridiron will make a difference. But when we're talking about millions of dollars being thrown around for individual players, of course that's going to often trump how many playoff appearances, NFL draft picks, or individual accolades are being earned. But it doesn't mean they don't matter at all.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!