-
Posts
3453 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by hpslugga
-
-
On 2/12/2021 at 1:22 PM, Jive Turkey said:
Lauren's mom is claiming that Lauren's dad is none other than former Midnight Express member "Sweet" Stan Lane. (although some old schoolers may think of him as a member of the Fabulous Ones)
oh, and Stan Lane is the first cousin of Lauren's mom.
😲
Necro bump:
Yeah, Lauren’s mother is/was a lying whore (shocking I know).
Of course it does explain why poor Lauren is so easily given to conspiracy theories: the fucking bullshit is genetic.
-
1
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, Underdog said:
Be interesting to see how Miami comes out in Boston after blowing a 3-0 series lead and lose this one in that fashion.
They'll look like Portland did in the WCF of '99
-
On 5/8/2023 at 1:37 PM, JWinTX said:
Pony Excess was my favorite, but the best one was the Duke Lacrosse fiasco where justice prevailed. Mike Nifong tried his very best to play politics to stay in power and gain popularity, all the while not giving one care about the lives he was about to crush because of lies.
I would love to send this to Nifong
https://www.highlandparklacrosse.org/news_article/show/1273128
-
26 minutes ago, Bevo said:
It would have to be very deep and that’s kinda my point regarding the pass rush. If your protection could hold up for that long? Yeah let it rip, provided of course the X/Z can 1) get off the corner after breaking back to the outside and 2) get to the spot as fast as possible so as to keep the safety away from the play. I just think training your X’s and Z’s to get that outside release on the fly is much better for your QB’s safety and the margin for error on the throw.
-
1
-
-
On 5/22/2023 at 11:01 AM, Tex Pete said:
Depends on the coach, I guess. I held the headset cord for Hal Mumme many moons ago, and he would definitely run 25 plays in order. I am sure that he may situationally change a play (inside the 5, for instance), but he had an exact script that he followed.
He would often run his first play with all his receivers (which were all his skill players in the Run and Shoot) running streaks. He scored on that a lot.
Just now saw this.
Hal was one of the few who could get away with that. They built in so many different route combinations through using choice routes that they could call the same play 5 times in a row and it would all look completely different on film...especially back in those days.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Bevo said:
So you are still hoping the two safeties can cover all the go routes? In modern offenses is there a read to where the QB throws the ball towards the corners of the end zone (ie. outside shoulder) knowing the wr will break back from where the CB pushed him inside.
Perhaps you could draw up such a play? I’m not saying that to be a smart ass; I really have not heard of such a concept. Usually when a receiver adjusts a route, it’s because either there’s a built in principle (a la Mouse Davis’ offense with all those option routes to be made between the 5th and 8th steps) or the QB is scrambling around and the WR has gone well past the point where he should expect the ball to be thrown to him and he needs to shake a defender. Typically when a WR gets re-routed, he fights his way back to where he’s supposed to be (but that also means he’s less likely to get the ball). That’s especially true on the all go due to the nature of the play, more on that later.
Anyways, the bold part of what you said implies that the ball is close to the goal line and when a defense has a tendency to play cover 2 down there, OC’s tend not to call all go’s in particular. If they do, they’re absolutely counting on the idea that at least one of the X or Z will get a positive outside release. In other words if they get re-routed to the middle, that play is likely screwed. I personally would be more inclined to call all go’s against press man because that all gets boiled down to whom among the X and Z is getting the quick back shoulder throw.
But to your point about working the sideline after the X and Z have been re-routed towards the middle…that takes time to develop and you’re asking your QB to take quite a bit of time before releasing the ball. And if the space to throw the ball ends up being really small, you’re really cutting his nuts off.
“Hey, take about 5-7 seconds and throw this ball into a tight space…but you gotta be accurate bc ya know, balls picked on the sideline tend to get taken for a house call.”
Seems to me like that would be an extremely unlikely set up. I could be totally wrong, but I’m visualizing how long it takes an X/Z to get re-routed, work back, and actually get to the sideline area meaningfully downfield and in a space that’s too deep for a roll corner and too far away from a half field safety. In all go’s, the whole principle that all 4 WR’s abide to is that it’s what’s known as a “field marker route.” In other words it’s not just the the X and Z run flies. They generally run flies down the numbers (slots run down the college hash marks)…and now you’re talking about working back to the other side of the numbers?
-
If you’re in cover 2, you’re wanting both CB’s to re-route the X and Z to the inside, safeties are more or less splitting the diff between where either WR on their sides could wind up. You’d also want your MLB dropping deep to discourage any notions of the slots breaking off their routes into skinnies into the middle void, and for the OLB’s you’d want them trailing the slots so the QB doesn’t get cute and try to hit a quick one before the safety can get there.
Essentially all that is supposed to leave is the RB running some sort of check release and as a defense, you live with that. Sure that may be a 6-8 yard gain, but they were going for the home run ball. And of course if your pass rush is worth a shit, that QB ends up sampling fieldturf because the RB is obviously the 5th option.
-
3
-
-
11 minutes ago, Bevo said:
How does the defense handle that if it is in zone - let's say Cover 2?
Against all go’s?
-
On 5/21/2023 at 7:22 PM, shadow_operative said:
i've never understood game planning the first 15 or so plays of a game. imagine if a baseball manager told his pitcher, "here's the first 25 pitches you're going to throw, regardless of what's actually happening in the game." then again i'm not football coach or expert- not by a long shot. still, i can't be alone in wondering what the supposed advantage is of deciding the first 10-15 plays you're going to run on offense days before the game actually takes place.
bonus question: why don't coaches script their first 10-15 plays in defense if it's such a good idea on offense?
I've neglected to post much on topics like these in recent years largely because Texas' general decline in football has brought out the absolute worst quality of discourse. Nonetheless, this is a more general topic not specific to the Horns, so here it goes:
1. As has been already stated, the first 15 play script serves two purposes: it eliminates the guesswork, and all baggage that comes with guesswork, by the offensive players and allows them to run plays with which they're most familiar AND it also gives the HC and OC an idea about how the opposition is going to defend certain plays. So let's say that the offense runs the much maligned bubble screen to a slot receiver out of a trips set. Let's also say that this is on the first play of the game and the playside CB shoots the screen right off the snap. Ok, they've clearly been coached to do that...probably because the offense has shown nothing to counter that, at least not from that particular formation. An OC can dial up something a bit later in the game: call the bubble again, but this time have both the X and the other blocking slot WR fake like they're gonna block on the first 2-3 steps and then shoot up the field. Well the CB isn't gonna be able to defend the X because he's been told to flatly ignore him. The other slot can run a seam/post and it serves no purpose other than to occupy the playside safety (although if that safety is stupid enough to over-rotate to defend the X running a fly pattern, obviously that slot is very likely to be open downfield in the middle).
2. I agree with CTJ's characterization of the baseball analogy.
3. The script has contingencies. Have you seen those play calling charts that the play caller holds in front of his face so as to conceal his lips from the camera? Yeah, they're the same size up in the booth. Furthermore, the script on that chart constitutes a very limited fraction of its space. There are other spaces that list contingent play calls that take other factors into consideration that normal scripts do not. So, for example, it'll say what to do if the defense isn't showing the kinds of looks they've been known to show. Maybe they're blitzing on first down. Maybe they're using a 4-man front even though they're usually a 3-man front defense. Maybe they're using a single high safety instead of a cover 2. Maybe they're showing zone when they usually play an aggressive press. The contingency plays also allow for the OC to bail on the script because the offense has found itself in a predicament where the next play call wouldn't be helpful. So like maybe it's 3rd and 7 on the 5th play of the drive and you've got a power dive called for that one. Just bail on it. Duh. They've got scripts, but they're not abject slaves to them. In other words, if you took every coaches' scripts and you read through them and matched them on the film (and this all assumes you understand the names of the plays compared to what's being run), you will very often find yourself saying "hey, you didn't run the play that was in the script on that one! You're a great big phony!"
5. As to the defense having scripts, it's already been said. It's a much more reactive concept and a script can't help with that. So say you're a 4-3 defense and you trot out your regular personnel even though the offense is coming out in a 5-wide set. You're already at a disadvantage. And let's say you're doing an all-out blitz. Ok, now you're pretty much fucked unless the other team just sucks that bad. Offenses are the ones with the scripts because they're the ones with the ball.
-
5
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Wulaw Horn said:
I don’t know that anyone is buying them as plucky upstart disrupters.
They're not, but that's not stopping the LIV and its players from playing this little game of Make Believe and Pretend in trying to foist that image on the public, hence DeChambeau's flowery and asinine comments yesterday.
-
48 minutes ago, Wulaw Horn said:
We go along with it in every other arena
In terms of corporate business fucks tolerating it in order to profit? Yeah. Greg Norman isn’t the only one that refers to the murder of Jamal Khashoggi as “a mistake.”
But in terms of what the public tolerates? Not a chance. https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/1/6/21050019/saudi-arabia-poll-unpopular
And that’s what my point was: it’s just pure confusion to speak of this “tour” as if it were the USFL of pro golf. It isn’t. This is not some admirable story about some upstart, underdog sports organization fighting uphill against the evil forces of the PGA Tour. But they certainly love to project that image. Gee, I wonder why.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, Firemans4Horn said:
Fuck the Saudi’s
That’s really all that needs to be said about it. All this flowery talk about “fair competition” and “getting together” is background noise. The LIV is just another Saudi endeavor at sportswashing. That’s all this is. It’s no different than when they forayed into WWE (John Oliver had a great piece on that) or when Qatar and Russia hosted the last two World Cups or when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union hosted summer olympiads. This happens all the time, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone that this “tour” is both using Donald Trump courses and trying to portray itself as the proverbial USFL of golf. What does surprise me is how easily some people fall for this shit.
-
2
-
-
10 hours ago, Captainant said:
What evidence are you basing this on? Because in the barest, most technical sense you're correct - but ISPs do things like force you to their DNS and CDN servers by hard coding it into the modem, which does measurably impact performance. Sure, you can buy and configure your own edge router to do it properly, and then it's pretty fuckin nice to have fiber gigabit (just saying), but 95% or more of their customers probably won't do that.
Because there's no privacy rules or neutrality rules in place, the ISPs can harvest your raw traffic data and sell it to advertisers (or literally anyone who's buying) and do shitty things like injecting additional ads into pages, which is also a significant security risk on top of everything else. Oh also, the ISPs don't have to report data on throttling, so of course there's """no throttling""". Why the fuck would they out their own sheistyness?
I really don't understand your hate for net neutrality.
He does not either. It’s hard to understand one’s own hatred of an issue when they don’t even understand the issue.
-
8 hours ago, Fastbreak said:
Trumpers don't watch CNN.
The people who watch CNN, don't like TrumpBy featuring Trump, CNN has pissed off people who liked them, without gaining any additional people who weren't going to watch it anyway. Trump isn't hurt by this (he isn't hurt by much of anything), only CNN is hurt. Whoever made the decision should be fired and shamed.
This. I mean I don’t watch cable news just as a matter of sanity and sound decision making practices, but I know enough about it to know that they who watched Fox for decades consider CNN to be the “Communist News Network.” They were not looking to jump leftwards to CNN when Fox fell apart with this lawsuit. They just want equally nutbaggish networks that don’t owe three quarters of a billion dollars in defamation suits (at least for the moment). Motherfuckers who watch Fox News don’t watch it to be informed. They watch it to have their pre-existing opinions validated. CNN ain’t doin that.
-
2
-
-
12 minutes ago, Hate said:
I have no idea who that was, but he looked fairly short.
Just the best soccer player in the world. He's 5'10"
-
14 minutes ago, RiverwalkMiner said:
And I almost forgot to add, those prepubescent losers got the #1 pick 4 times in a span of 27 years ('76, '83, '84, and '02). The last 3 were over a span of 20 years and included Ralph Sampson, Akeem Olajuwon and Yao Ming; all HOF'ers. Who the fuck do they think they're kidding?
-
1
-
-
52 minutes ago, gofuckyourself said:
Absolutely they wanted the Spurs. Diplomacy states they don't say that, overtly, but doubtless.
I mean, the Pistons were in play. And apparently during the actual lottery ball selection, the Wizards had a good chance.
He dodged a Bullet.
ISWYDT
-
1
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, BurntOrange&White said:
Obviously a Rockets scout
3 times in 35 years.
Cleveland had four #1 overalls in 12 fucking seasons. But sure, let's all talk about how fucking rigged it is for the Spurs to land it at a clip of once every dozen fucking years. Once again, stupid motherfuckers with their ideas of a smart thing to say.
-
3
-
-
11 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:
Well, the way the Carter Page warrant was obtained was anything but commendable and we should all agree on that.
That's within the margin of "FBI are cops and do shitty things" standard error.
And it should be abundantly clear that Russia believes it has an ally or has made an ally in the Trumpy right wing.
It should also be abudantly clear that Russia sucks and is entirely too close to the Trumpy right wing.
QED Trump sucks.
As I’ve often said even before the Mueller Report was released, even if the very worst of the allegations about Trump re: Russia were 100% true, they barely constitute a blip on the radar in terms of the shittiest things he’s done since 2015.
I do love seeing all his sycophantic followers gushing over this news as if it changes everything…or even anything. Reminds me of…
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
11 hours ago, C-Man said:So let me see if I have this straight. Fuckstick Paxton announces an investigation into Dell Children’s adolescent physician group due to gender-affirming treatment, which is only a fraction of what they do. In response, the physicians in this group quit en masse?
Fuck this timeline.
I mean...that should not surprise anyone with a modicum of honesty and/or a conscience. This is what these people do: they take, at least what they view as, the most outrageous element of some service provider and morph it into an entirety with their little chickenshit emotional appeal gimmick. Planned Parenthood's abortion services accounts for somewhere between 3-12% of what they do, which means at least 88% of what they do is exactly not that. Third trimester abortions constitute less than 1% of total abortions, and virtually all of those are triggered by some sort of medical complication that arose late while the rest have to do with restricted access...
...but the same people you're describing would have us (and themselves) believe that all Planned Parenthood does is perform partial birth abortions on women who just suddenly changed their mind about the whole having-a-child thing because they suddenly realized it interfered with some trip to Cabo. They're easily the most dishonest people you'll encounter in terms of political discourse, so it shouldn't surprise you at all that douchebags like Paxton are doing this type of horseshit either. This is just more of the same: the so-called "party of small/limited government" taking a huge interest in what other people do with their peepee parts.
-
17
-
5
-
5
-
49 minutes ago, Snake Diggity said:
Spoiler alert: those dudes aren’t as educated as you think they are. Bachelor degrees from A&M don’t mean shit.
EINO: Educated In Name Only
-
1
-
1
-
6
-
-
3 hours ago, Bozo_Casanova said:
So what was Bryan’s problem?
-
51 minutes ago, WhatTheBuck said:
Fox isn’t a news network. It’s a propaganda arm of the Republican Party masquerading as a news network. They traffic in lies and that’s what their viewership wants. The results are in and there’s no use pretending otherwise. They’re a 24-hour campaign ad. They’re Pravda for Republicans.
They’re a de facto platform for a bizarre collection of social media personalities and the “political party” for whom they carry the water have adopted that same principle as an electoral strategy. Let’s all just sit back and let them continue because they’re on their asses and from said asses do they absolutely love to tell everyone willing to listen to their feeble effluvia that they “own the libs.” Nothing guarantees consistency in failure better than when said failures are absolutely convinced of their own success.
Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty
in Cloak Room
Posted
Trump’s lawyers on FoxNews=WWE CM Punk
Trump’s lawyers in court=UFC CM Punk