Jump to content

Thetexashammer

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    3496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Thetexashammer

  1. I feel like the Aggy misery is being injected directly into my veins.
  2. Islam does not accept secular government. And the Koran is not Islamophobic. It is clear, for example, that the penalty for homosexuality is death. women are treated like slaves in Islam. Muslims are taught to hate jews and christians. These ideas are not compatible with democracy.
  3. User name checks out.
  4. I still can't believe we ran the table after OU. Just an amazing run. I was convinced we were not going to make the championship.
  5. Sam Harris | Home of the Making Sense Podcast As Sam has said, Islam is the mother of all bad ideas. Their antisemitism and antichristianism is dogmatic, it is in the text.
  6. I mean, sure. But do you see Christians killing muslims and screaming "God is Great!!!!WHARRRGABRBBBBBLLL" No. Because their definition of a "good person" in simply different than ours. The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).
  7. But they were too cheap to pay for the paperwork?
  8. Ali coins make me think of the old joke about "I wouldn't fuck her with your dick". YMMV.
  9. I could have lived a long happy life without seeing this.
  10. Not just anybody can get into an Extended Stay America.
  11. Sark is getting paid.
  12. He's like a real life Simple Jack.
  13. The AG was reading from the law and applying the facts. The Supreme court did likewise. The treating physician did not certify the medical requirement for the D&C, but that is a requirement, the hospital has a procedure to follow. It was not followed, then somehow an activist lawyer got involved. I assume you read the court's opinion, they seem to indicate, as the AG stated and I said early on, that this never needed to be in a court. I personally think the law is too restrictive.
  14. Ok, maybe. But hear me out. Maybe there is another perspective. It's hard to believe, but just go with it. Suspend your disbelief for a moment. Perhaps, and I know this seems really wild. Perhaps, no no no, I know, just maybe, 100 to 1, but it's possible. Maybe the world's richest man isn't broke.
  15. The AG is not making a factual finding that the procedure is legal. They are stating that the job of making a factual finding is the physician's. They are restating the law. They cannot state "it is legal". That is a factual determination made by the physician. I do apologize for my lack of clarity. To restate my position, there is no reason not to proceed with the procedure, outside of the hospital or the physician refusing to do so. It appears the law is fine, but there is something going on at the hospital. If you want to change the law, this is not the droid you are looking for.
  16. It's not my position that the AG said it is legal. The AG stated that the determination of whether it is legal occurs at the level of the medical provider. That is how the law operates. It is, however, my position you should read what the AG actually said. It appears you have not done that.
  17. The letter says you are allowed to do a D&C if the pregnancy "that places the female at risk of death OR POSES A SERIOUS RISK OF SUBSTANTIAL IMPARATIMENT OF A MAJOR BODILY FUNCTION UNLESS THE ABORTION IS PERFORMED". All the AG did was restate the law. I am not sure what isn't clear about that. She is at risk for uterine rupture. It's entirely clear, medically and morally. That was stated in the Mediaite article. Why is there even a lawsuit? The AG is not contesting the factual finding, just restating the law.
  18. The AG is saying that the procedure is legal, but the hospital is not following their own procedures. All they have to do is follow their existing procedures. The mediaite story claimed the patient was told that she was at risk for uterine rupture which would damage her fertility, so there appears to be no issue with meeting the requirements to make it legal. Is that correct?
  19. @TwiceHorn Twicehorn, aren't you a lawyer?
×
×
  • Create New...