Jump to content

Samson's Wig

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    2591
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Samson's Wig

  1. I come from that part of the state and I hear you, but the city of Lubbock itself is still much less conservative than the surrounding areas, just like most larger cities. I suspect that folks who aren't dye in the wool republicans just don't bother to vote up there for some reason. They passed an abortion sanctuary bill a few years back with only around 10,000 votes. In a city of ~300,000 That's insane to me. I think the issue may be more of no one bothering to rally the opposition than anything else, but if they continue to grow the shift will happen at some point, just like it has with Fort Worth. But yes, derailing significantly now. Apologies. Property taxes suck and I honestly don't know who to vote for that will make it any better.
  2. I'm kind of amazed that Lubbock County has remained red as its population has grown. One would think the clock has to be ticking, though, especially with the university there. Is it the most populous conservative county in the US after Oklahoma County (Oklahoma City)? And no, Orange County no longer counts. Nothing political intended here, as I'm not saying it's a good or a bad thing, just a reality that more populous areas tend to turn blue these days.
  3. Kind of hard to believe this guy didn't accidentally stumble onto the wrong property carrying that chainsaw. Austin might be the only city in this state he could have lasted this long. Glad he's getting some help, and hope it sticks.
  4. Good points. It's likely something the government will have to have its hand in either through subsidies, tax credits, etc., or full-blown ownership. I could see an investment in something like this maybe in lieu of other public transit options making sense for a city like Austin, but I don't have any kind of handle on the numbers. It's hard even to fathom the cost of building a functional train system in Austin, and we all know the city itself can't remotely peg the cost based on the current boondoggle.
  5. I think that would be great, but it would require mass adoption to improve traffic in any way, and maybe not even then, depending on how it's utilized. I also think we're a really long way off from it being a reality. I think the general rule for getting people to make major shifts in habits requires the cost to be about 10% of the current method. So first, we have to significantly improve self-driving vehicles to the point they're actually safe and functional (not anywhere close yet), and then we have to make the use of such a service cost 10% or less than owning a vehicle currently costs. Then, you might see mass adoption. Twenty years, maybe? More likely not for half a century. It's a nice thought, though, and I would definitely be an early adopter.
  6. Don't you get it? This is going to fix traffic. All the experts agree. Fewer lanes, less parking, and higher fees will all result in everyone getting rid of their car and biking everywhere (since public transport is not a realistic option). It works in all kinds of places located a thousand miles or more north of our latitude, so it will 100% work here. If you think it's too hot, you're probably just a fat pussy. There is a zero percent chance this makes things worse, as anyone who isn't a fool can see. You have to give it time, man!
  7. Thanks for your input and all, but this concrete cancer issue is best left to medical professionals.
  8. Fuck. I regret reading that.
  9. That's just about the sexiest campaign slogan I can think of.
  10. I've always assumed it was just a Chinese data mining racket. It sounds like it's just a modern QVC and taking advantage of housebound elderly folks. Probably both, I guess.
  11. I have found this story to be a solid litmus test when meeting someone from that area. If they defend this shit, even in the backhanded, passive way we're seen in this thread, I know they're not worth one more second of my time.
  12. They're still saying it. It's the favorite saying for generations of enabling pieces of shit who enable pieces of shit. "Boys will be boys" being the other common variant. When you hear that phrase, you know you're talking to a fucking moron.
  13. We are almost entirely in agreement here.
  14. People in the community following the super spreader event. This was early days before the weak had been culled, so some kids got to say goodbye to grandma because they needed a beer so badly. I don't blame the kids, FWIW. I would have probably done the same thing at that age. It was the parents who sanctioned the party, bought the booze, and then defended the actions even after it turned into a disaster that I think can eat a big bag of dicks. EDIT TO ADD: Regardless of whether you think that was appropriate behavior or not, it's an example of the entitlement of that community. This wasn't a year or two into the pandemic when vaccines were readily available, and the most vulnerable among us had already largely been exposed. This was early on when everyone was supposed to be locked down. When we didn't know what we were dealing with. Some folks don't think rules apply to them, or that notions of the common good have any validity whatsoever. They fucked around and found out, though.
  15. The stories out of that district are endless, whether you're talking about the infamous butt sex book banning (not the only book banning), the sexual assault of younger football players in the locker room, Qanon morons taking over school board meetings, etc. etc., but a shining example of the community is when there was a massive kegger, sanctioned by parents, thrown during the early days of the pandemic. We're talking early days before the politics took over, when everyone was hunkered down at home and wondering what exactly we were dealing with. Hundreds and hundreds of kids hanging out together and partying while everyone else was doing the responsible thing. People died. Obviously, tons of good people live out there, probably even a majority, but their success in football has allowed the scum of the earth to dictate terms and the assholes dominate. It's one of the ultimate football-first communities in Texas, built on Austin taxpayers' money before they got big enough to outrun recapture. We've had a number of friends move out of Austin to the area based in large part on their schools being ranked higher than AISD. Every single one of them moved back after a year or two of putting up with the shitty community. I could see living out there after the kids are grown, when I wouldn't have to deal with anyone else unless I chose to, but I don't know how decent people put up with the nutbaggery that invades the school district. Baker Mayfield is definitely the poster child for that fucked up place.
  16. The end result of this will clearly be a ban on all Nerf guns.
  17. And the real father of all these Canadian children? Trudeau. The old one.
  18. I don't think there is a shortage of discussion on this particular rhetorical technique, and yes I think it permeates much of public discourse these days. I'm not sure that assuming someone else is more extreme than they actually are falls into the same category, though. The motte and baily fallacy is a purposefully employed device, whereas an assumption of another person's motives or beliefs is instinctual. I think that ultimately it just comes down to plain old tribalism. "What you're talking about sounds vaguely like something one of them would say, so you must be a member of that other team! Now die!" This quirk of human nature is exploited well by political factions.
  19. I've considered spearheading an Austin secession movement. I haven't found any precedent for a city seceding from a state (although some states allow a city to secede from a county), but I'd like to see how the rest of Texas enjoys paying for their public schools (and other programs) without having the citizens of Austin as a whipping boy and piggy bank. I would likely require federal funding of some kind, and the city would become something along the lines of D.C. I think somewhere around 25% of their budget is funded by the feds. We wouldn't need that much as we wouldn't be housing their infrastructure. I don't think it would be a hard sell for the majority of Texans, who spew vitriol at Austin with every breath, as they've been trained to do to keep the entire charade going. Taxes wouldn't go down in this scenario, of course, but at least they'd stay local. All a pipe dream, but a fun one to indulge in from time to time.
  20. A DM with details on those services would be greatly appreciated.
  21. Do you live in Austin? You can get to $20k fairly easily (but yes, it's not average homes at that amount). I don't think people outside of Austin realize just how much we pay in property taxes, the vast majority of which do not stay local. It's, in part, how the state funds itself, and it should be criminal. Almost half of it goes to AISD, which is to say it's stolen by the state to hand out to politically favorable suburban districts (and a big chunk just goes into the general fund). Austinites are robbed blind by the State of Texas.
  22. Yikes. My son plays soccer as well and will be trying out for the Lamar team next year. Thanks for giving me something else to worry about.
  23. McCallum is being renovated in phases. The first bond package already passed. It will take two more to get it all completed though based on the current plan (which is really fucking stupid). First phase will be starting fairly soon. Like most things with AISD, it's a clusterfuck. I just don't want my kids stuck in portables the entirety of high school, but I'll be shocked if they actually start demoing anything before 2030, when they graduate. https://macshieldonline.com/60278/news-2/bond-renovation-plans-take-shape/#:~:text=A floor plan layout of,to pass in Central Texas.
×
×
  • Create New...