Jump to content

RoyalBevo21

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RoyalBevo21

  1. Indiana literally actually just did this.
  2. We're locked in to Ohio St and Michigan. Both of those games were leveraged by Fox as part of our deal to move to the SEC. After that, yes, call up Rice and schedule for the next 10 years.
  3. I agree, but even Charlie Strong 5-7 Texas teams put beatings on G5 cream puffs. It adds nothing to the game and makes it way too convoluted to properly assess competition. This is the equivalent of a 6A team scheduling 5A teams. It's not good for the sport. Cignetti knows this and nuked every P4 game they had scheduled for the next few years. It's manipulating the system.
  4. I don't think FCS games should count as data points towards the postseason at all. For example, Indiana should be viewed as a 10-0 team rather than 12-0. The FCS beatings over inflate stats, efficiencies, unit ranks, etc.
  5. It's the single biggest problem in college football. There's like this "poor little retard" class of teams where because they are historically bad and have never accomplished anything in their history. College football way over inflates what they accomplish to pump a Cinderella narrative. Indiana has essentially accomplished nothing other than beating one ranked team on the road by 10. And are being gifted #2 for it.
  6. It's what he always does. This fucking guy expects 7 yards a carry every run. If not he becomes a giant pussy.
  7. Fuckin imagine that. RUN THE GD BALL!!!!!!
  8. Pass/Run 12/4 Play calling savant my ass
  9. God, going to turf at DKR was retarded.
  10. Hence why I said running. There's no path to an already slim window of victory by doing the whole 15 carries for 10 yards bullshit.
  11. Can we nuke this entire OL in the off-season? How the fuck can you not run block? Just pathetic.
  12. Not true, they're weighting all wins the same and all losses the same. The number in the column is all that matters. We'll have to finish it Michigan and Ohio State games due to moving to the SEC and the deal with Fox. But after this there's literally zero point in scheduling tough OOC games.
  13. So special that the best offer Skattebo could get was FCS Sacramento St
  14. Fuckin Art Briles.... piece of shit.
  15. Except nobody on that list has anything as good as wins over: 3, 8, 12 as you can see..... the Florida St loss is just as bad as the Florida loss at this point. If Vandy wins out Tennessee will be unranked, same with Michigan if they lose to Ohio St. You're also acting like Alabama didn't survive losing to 3-7 South Carolina.
  16. Let's play this out. Texas 10-2 - Best wins: #3 Texas A&M, #8 Oklahoma, #12 Vanderbilt (assuming they're 12 if they win out) - Losses: 3-9 Florida, #4 Georgia Oklahoma 10-2 - Best Wins: #10 Alabama, #15 Michigan, #18 Tennessee (in this scenario Michigan and Tennessee might be unranked as they would both have another loss) Losses: #6 Ole Miss, #9 Texas (assuming 9th with only two losses) Alabama 10-2 Best wins: #4 Georgia, #12 Vanderbilt, #18 Tennessee Losses: 5-6 FSU, #8 Oklahoma Vanderbilt 10-2 Best wins: 7-4 Missouri Losses: #10 Alabama, #9 Texas In this scenario Texas has the best win and the worst loss. But owns H2H over Oklahoma. I think Alabama is the odd man out in this scenario.
  17. And Alabama's losses to Florida St and Oklahoma totally kick ass right? Again, you're making this too much about Texas rather than the ramifications of what comes with it. This was Texas Tech's OOC schedule: Arkansas-Pine Bluff Kent St Oregon St FCS games shouldn't even count towards your win/loss record. So a team like Indiana should be viewed as an 8-0 team instead of an 11-0 team. They're ranked second solely for winning at Oregon six weeks ago.
  18. Yes we can. You're completely overlooking the ramifications of scheduling and being purposely obtuse. You keep saying "Florida and Georgia losses are terrible" to the committee all losses are "terrible" since a 10-2 Texas that still lost to Florida and Georgia by 31 points is in the playoffs by playing Rice instead of Ohio St. Why are you just blowing past that?
  19. And would a 10-2 Texas with that schedule be in or out?
  20. Exactly what I'm saying. And on the flip side. What is Texas' record with BYU's schedule?
  21. This has nothing to do with Texas. I don't think the Horns look anything close to a playoff team this year. However, I don't think BYU, Utah, Notre Dame, Indiana, etc would have a better record with our schedule either. Do you? Hell, Arizona St lost in Starkville with Leavitt and Tyson. For sure Bear Bachmeier goes better than 3-1 playing this schedule and away from home for a month, right? @ Florida Oklahoma - neutral field @ Kentucky @ Mississippi St I think they're 2-2 at best.
  22. Because they suffer from the same problem pollsters do. Which is, the numbers in the W/L column instead of actually looking at whom those W/L's were built on. If all things were more balanced, nobody would finish undefeated. The fact is, Florida easily has the most talented roster if they joined the Big 12 tomorrow.
  23. I don't understand how people don't get this? There's a huge problem in college football and that problem is scheduling imbalance. Do we really believe Indiana, Texas Tech, BYU, Utah don't have more losses with Georgia, Ohio St, Alabama, Oklahoma, Michigan, etc on the schedule. Until games against Long Island and Chattanooga St no longer count towards data points then There's completely no reason to schedule hard games other than for fan enjoyment. Losing by 7 in Columbus to #1 Ohio St is more impressive than beating 1-9 Samford 56-0. And should be weighted and measured as such.
  24. Since Mississippi St this defense is allowing 35 points per game. Not sure what happened in Starkville, but they've gone full retard ever since.
×
×
  • Create New...