-
Posts
2868 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Levi
-
-
16 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:
Sark doesn't owe you shit. It could be a personal issue between him and PK. It could be that he thinks PK is really good but not quite good enough for the SEC. It could be that PK was angling for a job on the West Coast and Sark found out about it. It could be that Sark wanted to blitz twice as much as PK did and that was it. There could be a million different reasons.
Just win, baby.For the most part I agree with you. I’m not one of those to cling on every word in a coach’s press conference and cry when he does coach speak. I find it funny when people do in the weekly press conference threads. But I think PK being one of the highest paid coordinators in the nation and by all means doing the best job last 3-4 years, an explanation is the right thing to do in this particular shower. But I can see why others may disagree.
-
I also think Sark needed to give an actual reason as to why he let PK go. Agreeing or disagreeing with what he said is almost irrelevant imo. Sark let a top 10 DC go, I want to know why he did and don’t go into coach speaking mode which he is really good at doing. Having to go with reasons given by people in the know on here or 9.95 sources would just piss off everyone more than common coach speak answer.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:
I feel like Sark is saving Banks and Flood as the last guys to throw overboard. Mack did the same with Greg and Manny
There's no problem with this way of thinking but Sark is implying he needed to babysit PK which is assinine BS as the defense has outperformed the offense the last 3 years
Against Georgia there’s a good chance our corners continue to play 10 yards off on 3&5 after the 1st quarter. I think that is what Sark is talking about. There’s just too many games where we were playing too soft when we didn’t need, especially in crucial situations. The back end was never in sync with the front and that starts with the DC. Sark obviously wanted a guy that can navigate the entire defense at a high level.
-
2 hours ago, Hank_Hill said:
The football board response is going as expected
I just ventured over there and it took them 8 pages to figure out that Sark probably didn’t “fire” PK. Also, since Will was hired, Flood is definitely coming back.
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, Derka said:
Side note: Happy Endings deserved more than three seasons. Criminally underrated show.
-
3
-
1
-
-
Rewatching the game and I find it hilarious that the Aggies offensive kryptonite seems to be guys with the athletic build of Big Bird on our defense. Broughton and Burke last year and then Burke again this year. I’m going to miss his goody lookin ass wreak havoc against opposing offenses. Anyway, here’s a couple all-22 clips from the game I found. SIAP.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Props to Lefau for stepping up with Hill being out and Smith missing the first half.
-
19
-
2
-
33 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:
I posted that article. Sark actually disputed Bohl’s claim saying he wished he had that kind of roster money.
so I am hoping that we can get some clarification on what we spent on our roster.
we know Arch doesn’t draw any money from the collective. He gets money thru the independent deals his family sought out on their own for endorsement deals. It frees up the millions we have spent on the other players.
regardless it is routinely stated in multiple articles from multiple sources that this is the most expensive roster for Texas since NIL and one of the most expensive in CFB.
So when you don’t make the playoffs (and our hopes aren’t completely dead…just mostly dead) that’s flushing a ton of money down the toilet. Same for the other teams that are spending close to the same amount. If you don’t at least make the expanded playoffs it’s a lot of money wasted.
particularly in year 5 of a career. Or year Franklin or anyone else. You are not getting multiple 3 loss seasons and no playoff appearances anymore, that’s the reality fair or unfair. The more money spent the higher the expectations. Tough shit. 💩
Pages 55 and 56 on the NIL Recruiting News Megathread kinda go over the article. Doesn’t give the exact number but the post shitting on Bohls and his foolish behavior is a joy to read.
Edit: RGBIII gave clarity.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, JohnnyTapia said:
Nansen is having to coach the LB's and Safeties this season.. from what I've heard. Complete mess
Yikes.
-
2
-
-
25 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
Can't much argue with that. The OL is the most glaring problem and seemingly the most inexplicable.
Although the Akina hire seems most unfortunate, it happened for a good reason in Gideon departing for a DC job and Joseph for the NFL.
And you have to think PK had some input in the hire. Can't solely tag Sark with that.
Nansen, too. Akina was under him at Arizona.
-
2 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:
Oh man totally got me. I'm crushed by your top tier smack. So witty and brilliant.
So you have provide exactly jack shit to support any of your points.
I'm impressed.
At this point it’s just comical. Bravo.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:
Ah... the way the aggie fans responded was similar to Sarks. That's what you're landing on as its the only example, for which you provided no backing, of your entire point.
Let's just go ahead and pretend you provided evidence. You've aligned Sark's comments to that of aggie fans.
Solid counter point to him not being a petulant child.
You’re being obtuse. If anything I aligned Schloss with Sark and Aggie fans to you. Sark/Schloss make a statement about their future, Aggies/BurntEyes subjective opinion of the statement. For lack other evidence that you so desperately need on a topic that is widely known, you’re just going to have to trust me. Seems to be the theme of this thread anyway. I might as well join.
-
1 minute ago, BurntEyes said:
I see. You have nothing to support your position and are talking in circles. It's a bold strategy.
It was rhetorical. I’m just not going to waste my time on a topic that is widely known and to a certain extent is subjective. I gave you the former in a general explanation and offered a subjective example for the latter with Schloss. Your subjective opinion on how Sark answered questions about the roster being poached or the future of his job doesn’t really concern me at this point.
-
5 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:
I've never claimed the thrown if shit poster. I would never try and take that crown for Rimbo or the other amazing candidates in this thread.
So.. you don't have any examples other than what aggie fans would say.
Would you like me to give you quotes from coaches in response to their future and then tell you whether or not the fan base thought it was a bitchy answer?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, BurntEyes said:
Crying about being poached, bitching at people saying he's leaving. Pick one.
Well coaches have gone on the record about their future since the dawn of time. Aggie fans will say Schloss answered like a bitch when asked if he was leaving or not. Whether the statement coaches make has any validity to it is not made clear till later. I really shouldn’t have to do the work for you about coaches being pissed about schools trying to poach their roster. That’s just amplified with Sark right now due to the smoke revolving around his future here.
-
4 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:
Have you heard Lane or any other coaches that might be in demand make similar statements? Please, I haven't heard of any like Sark's but I'm good with being educated if they have occured.
To which point? The roster or making a statement about the future?
-
27 minutes ago, immamac said:
Lmao he's adding gasoline to the fire. "Have you seen your coach melting down unprompted?" Then having a meltdown at practice before Arkansas convincing them you'll stay and you love them hahahaha. What a joke.
Melt down? Get ahold of yourself. Sark has made one statement that was unprompted.
I guess we’re all forgetting about the university melting down after the Kansas loss. CDC had to send out a public vote of confidence. I think CDC and Hartzell even visited a practice to talk to the team. I might be miss remembering that tho.
(I hit submit earlier and I didn’t see my post go through. If you have 2 replies from me that are different then that’s why)
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, immamac said:
It was stupid when he said it, but it became much more realistic when everything shook out the way it did. Revshare by itself is your number and TOF didn't go away...
Lmao that you think the roster isn't getting poked at regardless of any of this. I swear you guys are hilarious with your narratives. Sark did it for selfish reasons. His behavior as of late is screaming ME ME ME ME ME ME.
He thinks he's bigger than the program. He's wrong.
I’m not ignorant to the notion that rosters aren’t being inquired by other programs. There’s a difference between programs poaching rosters with a coach leaving/fired than a coach staying. Those are two completely different angles of attack with one being helluva lot easier in terms of having success. If Sark had said almost nothing from the moment the first report on his future came out before Miss st to now, the fans base would screaming for some type of statement from Sark.
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, immamac said:
You know what he could do? He could just say he'd gonna take questions about the game and the team and his career isn't a topic he's willing to discuss and he's focused on the current season.
He also wasn't asked. He opened it himself. A very look at me stupid fucking bullshit thing to do.
That ignores the outside noise, no? The most recent comment from Sark on his future had multiple reasons as to why he wanted to speak on the issue. One of those being the guys on the roster are being poked at from other programs.
Sark is at a point with all this stuff that it has become a damned if you do, damned if you don’t. Nothing he says or even not willing to speak on is going to please the fan base right now.
-
3
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Arch was so bad against OSU he didn’t give Wingo the chance to drop the ball on the two shallow crossers.
-
2
-
10
-
27 minutes ago, Tex Long said:
You practice receiving onside kicks with the hands team. You put them on the field when you expect onside kick coming. There was no situational need for onside, it was Kirby Smart actually coaching. The hands team was not on the field. The regular receiving team looked like it had never even heard of or seen an onside kick, which wouldn't surprise any of us.
Wut? You practice with your usual front line to be prepared for a surprise onside kick. They placed it right in the gap between Jonah and Roberson. Jonah was right there to make the play but was surprised and late because our special teams coach doesn’t practice this stuff with any type of urgency. Teams that are disciplined and prepare accordingly don’t need a hands team to stop a surprise onside kick against Georgias normal kick off unit.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Royale with cheese said:
I've noticed that PK coaches a whole lot better when he has 4 or 5 fast, athletic NFL-caliber upperclassmen in the secondary. Somethin', somethin' . . . Jimmies and Joes . . . somethin'.
Right but you could make that assumption for any coach. Kirby has been exposed in the passing game this year against teams that can take advantage of it. I think it might have been @Codaxx that mentioned PK needs the position coaches under him that know the scheme 100% or at least can translate it to the players. Too many errors in the secondary that stem from mental lapses rather than just getting beat.
-
7 minutes ago, UncleBuck said:
A blowout is not ONLY being dominant from start to end. You can hang around three quarters, then the momentum swings and you get your ass blown out. Sure, it was close, for three quarters, then it wasn't.
That’s kind of what I always thought a blowout was. Even down 21–10, I thought we were still in it and if we were to lose the final score would have us losing by 7 or 10. The fourth quarter was a disaster though, and you could feel the energy leave the Texas side once Georgia recovered the onside kick. In that sense, the game finished like it was a blowout because of the way our team reacted to the Georgia momentum. Everyone in that stadium knew our defense was leaving it all out there and the tank was running on empty.
-
This really only works if you can get a guy like Freeman. Those types will be in the playoffs so roster retention will be extremely difficult. Florida is only holding on because of the buzz surrounding them with Kiffin.
This is who Steve Sarkisian is.
in Football
Posted
Yeah others have said similar as to why they think he let PK go and I agree with most of those reasons. My post was mainly in favor of him saying something today outside of coach speak.