-
Posts
1430 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Serak The Preparer
-
-
4 hours ago, perfectchaos007 said:
Final margins of 8 points or less, here's where Texas is under Sark
2021: 2-5
2022: 2-5
2023: 0-1
Overall: 4-11If we aren't winning big, we're probably losing.
Another wat to look at this is the first two hears he was coach he had 7 close games. This year he's had 1 (while winning all non-close games). That seems like a pretty damn good trajectory to me.
-
3
-
-
20 minutes ago, Grade of D as in David said:
Are we going to be able to get 85 seats together or are we going to split the team up into different sections? Because the only way we go to Arlington is in the stands.
Egregiously stupid post. Please say who you think is going to win out in remaining schedule other than Texas.
-
1
-
-
Just now, Pancho said:
If we play and coach like today, yes. You don’t think TCu or ISU will go all out to beat Texas in their last year of the big 12 and playing in those stadiums in possibly forever?
The question I’ve had for 25 years is why don’t we treat the Texas/ou game with the same amount of vitriol as ou does?
Fair enough. I think even if Texas plays and coaches exactly as today we beat TCU and ISU by 7+. I could be whistling past the graveyard but even a bad texas game in 2023 is much better than bad Texas games from the last 15 years, and TCU and ISU are just not that good. This is a shitty big 12. Yes Texas could miss the rematch but would you say odds of that are >50%?
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, troph said:
Well I’m not convinced there is any serious threat yet for a tie for second at one loss.
This is where I'm at. If it happens oh well fuck us but how about we play as if we should just win every game?
-
1
-
-
-
4 minutes ago, Pancho said:
We can definitely lose @TCU and @ISU if we play like today.
We can technically lose every game on the schedule. Holy shit everyone sorry we are 5-6 to end the season.
Call your shot. Do we lose do either of those teams?
-
11 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:13 minutes ago, ATXhorn17 said:
Yup, everyone is already talking about a conference championship re-match. But I still see us dropping 1-2 more in the regular season.It's a tale as old as time. Lose the OU game and think running the table is inevitable and just get them back in December. Except it never happens like that
Texas is better than in previous years and the rest of the Big 12 is worse than previous years. Call your shot or stop being a bitch. Who beats Texas in rest of the regular season?
-
I mean if we're not going to ban @UTEX_ME for being the bleedingest gash in the history of gashes what are we even doing here?
-
It would be the most big 12 thing in the world for the last big 12 season with Texas and OU to have the loser backdoor their way into the championship and win. This just brings that universe this much closer to fruition.
-
17 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:
Obviously the defense could have saved the day but there was about a 80% chance OU at least gets it in field goal range with that much time left.
We get that first down, that threat goes away.
This such a stupid fucking statement. In a universe in which there is a 80% chance that any team in the world gets a fg in 1:30 drive with no timeouts what do you think the typical score is? It's certainly a hell of a lot higher than 34-30.
-
31 minutes ago, YGIFS said:
From Zagreb to Sarajevo, Ljubljana to Lisbon, Manhattan to Mar-a-Lago. Imagine how much old man, cum-of-mushroom dick soup that rancid cunt had to swallow or wipe off her face over the decades. And in the end, she'll have almost nothing to show for it but a pile of bankruptcy filings, a list of mistresses demanding hush money, and helping her son weigh offers to play the titular role in the George Muresan biopic. She should take the honorable way out and smother Trump in his sleep. She'd be well taken care of in that case and never have to worry about debasing herself ever again.
Ooh, do you think they'll recreate the best moment in commercial history?
"I'm Gheorghe Mureșan, do you want to smell like me?"
-
1
-
3
-
2
-
-
On 9/30/2023 at 5:01 PM, PRONG HORN said:
I'm glad this wasn't the holy shit thread cause I thought a horse was about to eat that baby.
-
10 minutes ago, TexArcher said:
Against Bye? I doubt it.
Plus, we're like 37 and 2 in playoff series against the American League the last few years. You'd know that, if you weren't a typical bandwagon-jumping Ranger fan who slept through the last dozen years of MLB.
Hey can you lay off FartingDreamer? He is highly regarded and this is one of his few outlets. I heard this straight from one his wives.
-
1
-
4
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, mchookem said:
fatty just climaxed.
Oh come, that's bullshit and not fair. There's not even a school kid in front of him.
-
1
-
9
-
2
-
-
9 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:
Don't forget the legal system, which wealth creators tend to use a lot more of and depend a lot more on than the average bloke.
I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader to determine if that omission was intentional or not.
-
1
-
-
I'm good with that no call. Clearly hit him early but was also uncatchable.
-
9 hours ago, Chewbacca said:
I don't have a problem with wealth creation (I've created a bit myself). I have never needed anything from the government. And yet I still believe we should be decent to each other (you know, the whole love your neighbor thing). And I still think you and anyone who thinks Jan 6 was anything other than a coup attempt is a fucking traitor. Have a good night. May your boat spring a leak the next time you go fishing.That's not true, unless you are saying you never needed education for yourself or those around you, police protection for the wealth you generated, the ability to travel on roads or through air, the ability to breathe clean air and drink clear water, the ability to take safe medication, etc. I am not trying to call you out Chewbacca, as I am pretty sure you would recognize all of this, but it is important to recognize that we all benefit strongly from the government beyond direct monetary assistance.
-
4
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:
I don't know. Just remember it was that shitbag and his dumb beard taking a pic with another guy who ended somehow being an even bigger shitbag. And he got eviscerated here for it. Then again, Cruz so who really gaf.
So you don't have a relevant point or relevant example, just wanted to white knight for Ana.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:
Like Ted Cruz taking a pic with a guy who ends up being a shitbag. And then getting ripped on it for this site, as if he knew who some rando wanting a pic was? That's what you mean by error not lying with the audience, correct?
I 100% agree that if a rando gets a picture taken with Ted Cruz and that rando is a shitbag, then it's not on Ted Cruz or his team (assuming that said rando was not specifically invited to event). With the acknowledgement that Cruz gets shit on regularly on this forum, are there particular events you are thinking of or are you creating false events to create outrage over in an effort to equivicate Ana's statement about applauding Nazis?
-
2 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:
Well posters bring evidence of it here (like Ana did) and people crack on it and as your put it, don't put a huge amount of critical thinking into it. But then again, it's the other way around, so you know...
None of them actual Nazis though. So. Not very pretty.
You dolt, what is it you think Ana brought evidence of? That people applaud when prompted to? Holy shit, you solved the laugh track riddle!
Clearly the Canadian org that brought this dude in should have done some research and has significant fault but the error doesn't lie with the audience. Saying they were applauding a Nazi as if there was any knowledge of his past is incredibly disingenuous.
-
2
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:
Politicians get heat for taking pics with people who end up being shitbags all the time. I've seen it on this site. But no one was excusing it then. Weird.
If those politicians posted on this board this would be a super relevant comment.
-
4 hours ago, Anastasis said:
Said in serious fashion by the guys that give standing ovations to nazis because they have pretty basic lack of awareness of history and context.
I've been drinking while watching cfb and interesting mlb games the last few hours but really @Anastasis? Your entry in this conversation was to accused audience members who were told to applaud for someone they had no particular reason to cause a scene over, that they were cheering for nazis as if giving overt approval of nazis? If I shake hands with someone at my church/social club/job, am I appoving their life history? I agree with many if your claims that critical thinking is sorely lacking in many facets of life but you laid a giant turd in the punch bowl here and then were affronted when called our by it.
-
4
-
-
22 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:
Gavin needs to say some kind words and immediately appoint her successor. We don't have time to fuck around.;
If Gavin has not had her replacement selected for the last several months then he is incredibly incompetent, and for all of his faults, I don't think that is one. Maybe replacement isn't announced today out of respect but I would be really surprised if not announced by Monday. This event isn't exactly a shocker.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:
No, Neil Young having sex with Kate Bush led to WWI, according to my African American over there.I see someone mention Kate Bush, I'm gonna watch the greatest video ever made. Sorry I don't make the rules, I just follow them.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rematch!
in Football
Posted
Becauase Texas is significantly better than every one of the remaining opponents. In s shitty game with three turnovers against a very good team Texas lost on a last second touchdown. Other than OU, someone has to go to the big 12 title game. Who goes? Otherwise your bleating is as inane as "X team is over-ranked". Well fine, who should be ranked higher?