Jump to content

bolverk

New Members
  • Posts

    16658
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by bolverk

  1. Taking state media to the next level.
  2. Here's some context: A veiled threat to stone transpeople by justifying it through the Old Testament, while criticizing someone for being tolerant of transpeople who justify their tolerance from the New Testament Christ's command to love your neighbor as yourself. Then, the second post where he angrily shouts to that audience that someone is an abomination to God. These aren't soundbites with short clips taken out of context. Maybe -phobe is the wrong suffix, but then again, fear is at the heart of hate. And Kirk clearly hated transpeople.
  3. H/T to C-Man for posting this. Go here to rep him.
  4. The silence from ardent Free Speech advocates is deafening. In his own words, the Governor is expressing his pleasure that the proverbial State, with a capital S, is punishing a woman for her speech, regardless of whether it involved any alleged assault.
  5. Aha! Now, we're getting somewhere.
  6. You made a stink about Brisket paraphrasing Kirk's speech as if he had the intent to mischaracterize Kirk's actual words. I provided several direct quotations of Kirk's speech, including a video to corroborate Brisket's characterizations. You then went silent. I'm bolverk; I have spoken.
  7. Hey, you still haven't answered the direct questions I posed to you based on direct quotes of Kirk without paraphrasing.
  8. Fair point. Edit: Also, based on that pic above and what you're saying, I'll drop it. Evidence presented suggests: red herring. Thanks for setting me straight guys.
  9. I'm the one who brought it up, and I'm certainly not trying to deflect. I'm pointing out that *if* he was wearing body armor, it's possible that he's been threatened before. If so, could his wearing it be chronologically tied to an event or series of events, such as an organized effort to do "war" with him? Or was there something else. It's possibly a red herring, but my intent was not to distract.
  10. You might have to ask @C-Man. His post above indicates he might've been the one who originally posted it. I've tagged him so he'll see this in case he has you on ignore. I'd provide the link, but I really don't want to go digging back through all the posts from over the weekend in both threads.
  11. It's taken me a while, but I've finally caught up with both this and the other thread. Someone, maybe in the other, watched a detailed analysis of the shooting (zoomed in) conducted by some kind of expert. I didn't watch it because I couldn't watch it from a queasy stomach standpoint, so I'll have to take that poster's word for it. Anyway, that poster is absolutely convinced Kirk was wearing titanium armor plating, which the bullet struck the edge of, ricocheted up into, and out of his neck. This brings up two obvious questions: 1) Why was he wearing armor? and 2) When did he start wearing armor? Yes, he (rightly) felt a threat. Had he been attacked before? Had he been receiving threats? From whom? We certainly know by now about the Groyper Wars. Did one of them ever physically threaten him before? Did Kirk's use of body armor coincide with those "wars?" Was he ever consistently harassed by other groups or individuals? If so, by whom? Has there been any other reporting on this? Well, shit, I had a lot more than just two questions.
  12. Wordle 1,549 3/6 ⬛🟩🟨⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Connections Puzzle #827 🟪🟪🟪🟪 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🙂 Daily Quordle 1330 7️⃣8️⃣ 6️⃣4️⃣ m-w.com/games/quordle/ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜🟨🟨🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟩 ⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟩🟨🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
  13. I'm happy to provide you with some direct quotes from Charlie Kirk. What are your opinions on each of these statements? “If I see a Black pilot, I’m gonna be like, ’Boy, I hope he’s qualified.’” “They're coming out, and they're saying, 'I'm only here because of affirmative action.' Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the mid-1960s.” “You might want to crack open that Bible of yours. In a lesser referenced part of the same part of scripture, is in Leviticus 18 is that, ‘thou shalt lay with another man shall be stoned to death.’ Just sayin’! So Miss Rachel, you quote Leviticus 19… the chapter before affirms God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.” “It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.” “Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open-border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews and now it’s coming for Jews, and they're like, ‘What on Earth happened?’ And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it.” “MLK was awful. He's not a good person. He said one good thing he actually didn't believe.”
  14. What about before 1972 when the moratorium began?
  15. You're right. That Clarksville newspaper article isn't the full story. Here's the original Xitter post: https://xcancel.com/DripChud/status/1965924660236923329#m First, notice the date. It was posted on September 10, last Wednesday, the day that Kirk was murdered, and I have to assume the screenshot was taken on that date. Unfortunately, I cannot find Darren V Michael's Facebook page where this was supposedly posted. I did find his Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/darrenvmichael/), and that post doesn't show there. So now, second, notice the "6d" under Darren V Michael's name. What does that tell you? Well, it tells you that Darren V Michael posted that meme 6 DAYS BEFORE Kirk was murdered, and so therefore, it wasn't in reference to Charlie Kirk. Folks, take a moment to scroll through @DripChud's Xitter account (https://xcancel.com/DripChud), and tell me what you see. If you prefer to give traffic clicks to a website that promotes actual fucking Nazis, you can also visit the original https://x.com/dripchud?lang=en.
  16. That game next week is looming large.
  17. @Sgt Hulk The other link is still on the other game. This one is good.
  18. Lightning delay in Lubbock. The front is moving in, so it might be a while. Oregon State had the ball first, went three and out after two false starts. Tech was moving the ball and on the Oregon State 45 when the delay was called.
  19. I don't think so. The closest to what you're describing might be Rice, but they're not exactly a competitive rival, especially one that Texas plays annually.
  20. It could be for recruiting/exposure reasons up in the northeast. Dunno. It could be that one of his parents worked at Reese AFB and got relocated to Tinker.
  21. Wordle 1,547 3/6 ⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛ ⬛🟩🟨⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Connections Puzzle #825 🟪🟪🟪🟪 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🙂 Daily Quordle 1328 4️⃣8️⃣ 7️⃣5️⃣ m-w.com/games/quordle/ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟨 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜ ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
×
×
  • Create New...