Jump to content

Askew

Full Members
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

377 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You wouldnt be saying this if OU and Aggie were performing up to standard. The fact that both are shitting the bed, at least at Herman levels and nearing Strong levels, unquestionably lowers the stakes in recruiting.
  2. Except he wasnt sober. And his charge is DWI. Bro got pulled over for speeding and confessed to being high, with a weed pen in his possession. A smart person who hasnt been drinking, but is high AF does this: "Hello officer, no i was not aware of how fast I was driving. I am returning from a team event, these are prospective recruits. Yes i understand it is late. I apologize if my eyes are bloodshot we were swimming in a pool earlier. No, I am not sure what that pen is. No I have not used any drugs tonight. I would like to decline the field sobriety test and take the administered blood draw/blow test back at the station." Head to station and blow a 0.00. Get speeding ticket. Maybe they get you for possession of the weed pen. I doubt youd get a DWI. You definitely dont say "hello officer yes I have been at a club while underage with other underage people. We have been smoking a blunt and this weed pen, which is definitely mine. The weed pen works well, i am feeling it."
  3. Constructive possession is the term youre looking for. If the contraband is in plain view/easily accessible in the vehicle, then you are in possession.
  4. Not sure if this is accurate. Right now Butler can still lean on his recruit ranking. By next Dec hes a 3rd year JAG with no stats.
  5. The only question is if you can categorize Baxter as healthy. I am not counting on him being a contributor, at least early next season. But Clark coming back so soon has reduced the critical need. So the only remaining question is do you take a RB just to be absolutely sure you have 6 healthy guys.
  6. I am just trying to understand the Klubnick grading vs the Ewers grading, and the "complete game" concept. After Clemson's first drive of the game, Klubnick finishes the first half 5/12, 1 INT. Drive chart goes: punt, punt, INT, punt, FG, downs. Clemson down 28-10 at halftime. First drive of 2nd half, Texas scores a FG to make it 31-10. Klubnick then has that ridiculous diving sack fumble that Clemson luckily recovered. Clemson punt with 5;34 to go in 3Q, down 21 points. So, from 8 minutes left in 1Q, until 5 minutes left in 3Q, Clemson scores 3 points and is in a 21 point hole with an INT and sack fumble. But people on here want to say that Klubnick played a complete game?!? If Texas was in that position, Surly would have burned to the ground. This was nearly 3 full quarters of zero offensive production...but that QB gets an A for the game?
  7. It's also Baxter in the bottom right pic
  8. Chainsaw with that major Kyle Rittenhouse energy.
  9. Dems lost 2016 because Hillary refused to visit the midwest. You know, the midwest swing states who want moderate policy. Hillary had like a 97% approval rating among the hardcore democratic base. The base showed up and Hillary lost. Biden won 2020 because he pitched himself as a moderate unity ticket and he won back the midwest. Biden appealed to Trump voters who didn't like Trump. Do you not understand what the term swing voter means?
  10. Allowing child labor is actually on of the few republican policy points that doesn't involve controlling women, being racist, or giving more money to big business + rich people, so it is pretty near and dear to their hearts.
  11. Your other dumb childish takes on this board make a lot more sense now.
  12. Oh yeah im not arguing about the felony charge. I just hate the propaganda line that is being circulated in Trumpworld of 'NDAs are totally legal! His actions were fine and done all the time and this is a witch hunt!' as a way of dismissing the entire care -- the underlying behavior is definitely not legal in NY. It is a misdemeanor.
  13. Let's say the motive is to save his marriage. Is it easier to hide an affair using your business as a slush fund, or your personal account that your wife probably has access to? Even if there was no tax motive or election motive, it is still plausible a businessman would use his business to conceal a personal hush money payment. But, to use the business + lawyer method that was used here, you have to account the payment as a legal expense, even though there is no business purpose. This is a misdemeanor in NY.
  14. This is slightly off-point. There is an intermediate step between 'legal' and 'felony' that can make this a misdemeanor. If the same exact conduct had been proved (ie., Cohen paid Stormy, then Trump reimburses Cohen but accounts the payments as a business expense and not a personal expense), but the jury decided that Trump did so to save his marriage, that is a misdemeanor. You are correct that the intent to further another crime (eg., influence the election or to commit tax fraud) makes this a felony, but what Trump world is getting wrong is that there is almost no world where Trump gets off without a misdemeanor charge. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/how-could-trumps-new-york-hush-money-trial-end
×
×
  • Create New...