Jump to content

Dolemite

Full Members
  • Posts

    1033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dolemite

  1. 3 minutes ago, tchookem said:


     

     


    As someone who views government the same way you do, I can't understand how, at this point, you can honestly believe this about Trump. He's done nothing to eliminate those elements from his administration. In fact, everyone he's brought has made it worse.
     

     

    It is reported as being worse but the evidence indicates otherwise and if Trump can't fix this no one can. However, this may be the natural course of how a kleptocracy eventually collapses under its own thievery. 

  2. 9 hours ago, Crusher said:

    Some folks might not like Trump. And some folks may not like what the dems did to Trump with this whole "resist" thing.  They may not trust either party. 

    Myself, I would be very interested in a third party. A viable third party. Not sure if that is even possible but, I would look at it favorably.

     

    A Third party isn't possible. The two parties already have their territories staked out.

    While in public they vehemently disagree on so much while behind the scenes they split the spoils of a government run amuck which leaves no room for another player at the table. 

     

  3. 9 hours ago, Crusher said:

    OK..This will get you going … I think not only will Trump not be impeached...He will win again in 2020.

    This is from a guy who didn't vote for Trump. Didn't vote at all. Just watching what has happened since he was elected.

    I will vote in 2020. Kind of like the independent Howard Shultz after watching some interviews with him. Although I can't imagine what will happen to him if he actually won. Dems and Reps attacking him at the same time. He wouldn't stand a chance.

    I like Shultz too but he would only get bogged down in the muck and mire of DC. Only a maniac like Trump has a chance to defeat the thieves and criminals in our government. Which FWIW, is the only reason government exists, that is for the rich and powerful to fleece society with their wars and thieving ass banks providing the money to wage them. I wish Trump handled himself differently with some of the stuff he says but, I ignore it now because of well "Art of the Deal" etc. 

    Trump will win and my guess is Ivanka will run in 2024.

    Speaking of Banks, Read about BNY whose first loan was to fund the salaries of Congress. Oh, thank God they were there for the War of 1812 and let us not forget the Civil War. Such patriots. 

    The first bank in the U.S. was the Bank of North America in Philadelphia, which was chartered by the Continental Congress in 1781; Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were among its founding shareholders.[5] In February 1784, The Massachusetts Bank in Boston was chartered.[5]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bank_of_New_York_Mellon

     

  4. In a sane world, the discussion about Joe wouldn't be his touchy-feely tendencies.  It would be about Joe using the US Government to enrich his son. 

    The prosecutor he got fired was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into the natural gas firm Burisma Holdings that employed Biden’s younger son, Hunter, as a board member.

    U.S. banking records show Hunter Biden’s American-based firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers into one of its accounts — usually more than $166,000 a month — from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015,during a period when Vice President Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine and its tense relations with Russia. -The Hill

    https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived

     

     

    • Like 1
  5. 4 hours ago, NBMisha said:

    Talking with a fishing buddy yesterday:  his son in law is the new offensive coordinator for Georgia Tech, coming in from Temple with the HC.  He was talking about the GT-Temple matchup next season and possibly going to it.  I replied with the LSU at UT matchup, in light of the handling of Georgia.  He says Georgia mailed it in.  I really had to choke back the shit talk - our wives were right there.   The SEC suckfest is more widespread than I had imagined.

    Some SEC teams never lose. They either didn't play well or the ref's screwed them. UGA is the worst of the bunch.

    • Like 1
  6. On 3/28/2019 at 9:23 PM, Dr. Beeper said:

    He was, by far, the most likable funniest character. This fuckin’ guy

    Paulie loved art and knew a good painting when he saw it. 

    • Like 1
  7. On 3/29/2018 at 9:27 PM, BearSchlong said:

    Motherfucker signed an agreement, were spending thousands in network infrastructure/construction? And he had the balls to call me/email me a total of 10 times today to attempt to renegotiate his rate.

    Go back to India or learn how to do business in America, asshole.

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
     

    Had a much older experienced guy tell me that Indians don't think you negotiate until after an agreement is signed. 

  8. 5 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

    Awww come on, Doley. Don’t run away just yet. Your pwnage was just getting good. You sure you don’t want to cite a case establishing what you’re claiming? 

    Y'all hurting my feelings, and I am getting the fuck out. 

  9. 23 minutes ago, Gatorubet said:

    At the risk of introducing more Rush and Hannity sound bites, where did you  get the information that a POTUS can obstruct justice when acting in his official capacity and not be liable for that obstruction?   By that I mean, post a link with a SCOTUS (or at least a DC Circuit) decision, because anything other than that is, like, your opinion man.

    I am done. Go find it yourself. It wouldn't matter anyway since you are going to believe what you want to believe. 

    • Fuck You 6
  10. 40 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

    The constitution says the president can’t obstruct justice?  Does that mean he can’t obstruct Justice or he can but he gets to get way with it? 

    You might wanna sit the rest of this one out. I hear there’s a dude on shaggy named badmofo though. You might be good talking to him. 

    I guess he could rob a bank and tell the FBI not to investigate it so yeah I guess he can obstruct justice so I guess you win.

    The inability to obstruct justice is only when he is exercising his duty of chief law enforcement officer.

    But after what, 400+ pages of idiocy in this thread I don't see why it matters what anyone says now.

  11. Just now, Foosters said:

    Lol. 

    Says matter of factly that presidents cannot obstruct justice per the constitution.

    To back up his assertion, cites Wikipedia article that shows President Clinton being impeached for obstruction of justice.

    He perjured himself which is why he lost his law license for 5 years in Arkansas. 

     

  12. Except that Nunes has no motive because of the findings in the Mueller report as characterized by Barr's summary.

    However, our congress is a piece of shit in general and full of thieves so if you are going to release unredacted then give directly to the public.

    • Haha 1
    • Fuck You 1
  13. 31 minutes ago, retread said:

    Totally agree with horncyclist. The full, unredacted report has to be available at least to the gang of 8.

    Like Twice said earlier, the process is following the law. It just seems very hinky that the DOJ and the current AG both hamstring themselves against indicting the President re: obstruction, but the current AG decided he wanted to decide in favor of Trump in that regard. As has been said, this does not preclude Congress from making its own judgments, but it still stinks imo.

    Barr's words from the first letter ( https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html )

     

    3

    If you are going to let Schiff look at it, then releasing it to the public is preferable because Schiff will leak it to the press and colorize it in the way he wants to.

    He said, she said, etc. On and on.

    • Haha 1
    • Fuck You 1
  14. 4 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

    Just because he said he could not establish a case does not mean there is no evidence. In fact, quite the contrary. The report probably lays out what evidence exists and why Mueller thought it he could not make a case with it. The evidence may be inadmissible, it may come from witnesses with credibility problems, or it may come from individuals currently in Russia. 

    We won't know how much evidence Robert Mueller did or did not find until we read the report. Barr did not answer the question in his summary.

    It's a big ole goofy world lol.

     

  15. 16 minutes ago, Eminence Front said:

    19 page memo.

    Mueller btw didn't ignore evidence, Barr did, as per his 19 page memo outlining his theory that a President cannot constitutionally obstruct justice.

    Well, we know that constitutionally the prez can't obstruct justice but the wording was clear that Barr didn't consider the constitution. 

    Definition of obstruction of justice.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

×
×
  • Create New...