Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. That phrase did not begin with Reagan.
  2. Correct. You have no idea what you're talking about.
  3. These are ignorant points. Chinese hypersonic weapons are significantly more advanced than what Russia typically calls hypersonic. Modern hypersonic weapons aren't just about speed, but about maneuverability at speed. The glide vehicle hypersonic missiles utilized by China are legitimately impressive and currently offer a capability that the US cannot replicate in its in-service arsenal. We do have a number of programs developing hypersonic glide vehicles similar to what China currently fields and more advanced hypersonic cruise missiles (powered hypersonic flight).
  4. That you in fact don't know how taxes work.
  5. Selling my car isn't going to cost him money. So I'm not going to do that. But I will not be shopping a Tesla for future vehicles (unless perhaps he gets kicked the curb).
  6. You live in a commercial?
  7. I don't think that is a bad call. The ball touched the ground, but it didn't move and it appeared both players had it before it hit the ground.
  8. I'm willing to find out.
  9. Bills need to score before half.
  10. They have 1 penalty on defensive holding.
  11. It touched the ground, but it seemed to be in control of both players by that point.
  12. Really would have liked a replay of the catch before the TD. Worthy ran a really good route there.
  13. That looked really well timed to me.
  14. What point are you trying to make? Anyone who supports illegal actions to try and nullify the Constitution is traitorous trash. If you want to change birthright citizenship, pursue a constitutional amendment. Trying to blame the illegal actions of Trump on others for not embracing your stupid policy discussion is moronic. Get the fuck out.
  15. You hate America and Americans. You should get the fuck out.
  16. He is an idiot. That's the only point he can make. He also hates the Constitution.
  17. While I agree, it seemed like he should have thrown it the other way. Looked like it would have been a walk in.
  18. See Elon thread title for part of the reason.
  19. What experience do you have with tech? Your criticism of a fairly obvious set of concerns would have me question your acumen. And keep in mind the $200 a month costs you're citing don't give unlimited access. Each request requires a significant amount of energy to process. The type of volume tasks you're thinking this will apply to will be many orders of magnitude more expensive. Again, I think this solution is significantly less efficient than current automations. It only makes sense to use it in situations where current tools don't work well, but it isn't clear it would actually be good at that.
  20. Simply because current tools are somewhat adaptable doesn't imply this tool must be more so. There is actually zero guarantee of that. You're expecting of level of generalization that LLMs simply don't exhibit. If the website is within its training set or very similar to a website within its training set, it should work. But, website design changes fairly regularly. Amd many changes designed to promote usability actually confuse human users and result in lessened usability until the person becomes accustomed to it. That is simple for a human to do, but much more complicated for an LLM. Any a change that confuses a person is likely to also confuse an LLM like this. I also question the idea of using this product for web interaction generally. The applications where it might make sense are better served by dedicated APIs because those are more direct interactions and programs interfacing with them are less susceptible to errors. As to this being a solution to data entry, I think that is questionable as well. Many such positions have been replaced by automation already where it makes sense. And that automation is much more reliable than anything demonstrated by OpenAI. Your belief that lower accuracy is rates would still be beneficial is also questionable. Garbage in/ garbage out is common saying in the industry for a reason. High volume of a garbage in isn't inherently useful just because there is a lot of it. Usually it just means it will cost more to fix.
×
×
  • Create New...