Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17524
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Oh thank god. Big 12 crew would 100% have intentionally fucked us.
  2. We are going to be yelling about pad level a lot in practice this week.
  3. @Mitch Cumsteen is your wife looking for more stuff?
  4. You played Tennessee without the engine of their offense. And a huge part of their offensive stats were built against Chattanooga (718 yards) and Kent (740 yards). Texas is well above them in opponent adjusted metrics.
  5. Goosby makes his block and the play works. The DE is being read by Quinn. He crashes the run and Quinn throws to Helm.
  6. Is it an outlier? Or are the last two weeks the outlier? The Penn State game, Nebraska, and Michigan games suggest the latter. OSU's offense performed essentially the same in both Oregon games. It was the defense that was the difference.
  7. Yikes. Major had a rough game run blocking. And I don't see what purpose Juan Davis serves as a blocker. Either bring in another lineman or replace him with a receiver and stop condensing the formation. He cannot block. At all.
  8. At the snap the safety immediately plays run. If that is a play action or RPO pass, the safety would have taken himself completely out of the play. He is moving forward, so he wouldn't be able to assist on Wingo or stay with Helm if Helm actually ran a route. It looks like they gave us a look that would convince us to run, and then took it away by having the safety immediately attack the run.
  9. Did he? Arizona State's leading receiver was Skattebo with 99 yards, and 62 of those came on a single play against Taaffe (with OPI). The next highest receiver was McClain who had the one catch from Scattebo against Muhammad for 42 yard TD . I don't really remember Muhammad having to do much else.
  10. Ohio State will never see it coming.
  11. No fucking shit. I'm pretty sure you could write that about every single player in college football.
  12. Wisner doesn't seem surprised to not get the ball. Golden also looks like he is running a real route to me and even turns and looks for the ball at the 34. Moore and Goosby both appear to intentionally stay within 3 yards of the LOS on their blocking. Wingo (I think) at the bottom of the screen is setup to block, but isn't initiating contact downfield. It is almost like we are running two different plays.
  13. Early season Bond ran great routes. I don't think he is lazy. I think he can't cut due to injury.
  14. No he wasn't. He took a couple steps to his right, but not enough to leave the tackle box.
  15. Our dline is going to make life difficult for your offense in ways that Oregon and Tennessee couldn't. I don't buy that 3 weeks fixed your oline anymore than I bought the Clemson, Kentucky, or A&M games fixed our run game. Your team made a nice changeup and took advantage of good matchups. Howard is going to have to make reads against coverage and he is going to have to do it under pressure.
  16. He caught the ball, transferred hands, and then immediately rolled over with the ball securely in the same hand. Playing in slow mo and cutting off the end is misleading.
  17. Agreed. We also will not be running man against them all game long. Howard is going to have to read a defense and not just find his matchups.
  18. PFF guys had a good video on this. Ohio State went from essentially not running counter to running counter on 50%+ of run plays in the playoffs. They posited that it was the influence of staff that spend time with Mike Norvell and that they essentially installed Norvell's offense after the Michigan loss. Tennessee was completely unprepared. Oregon may have believed it was opponent specific and didnt expect it to carry over.
  19. It is absolutely scheme here. Our run scheme is heavily dependent on our line getting to their spots before the defense. If the defense gets there first, it blows up all the timing. We should be able to adjust to that and punish it. But for whatever reason we cannot.
  20. We are just responding to the bitching and pointing out why it is bullshit.
  21. He wasn't outside the tackle box though. At least, I don't think he was.
  22. Roughing or Running Into Kicker or Holder ARTICLE 16. a. When it is obvious that a scrimmage kick will be made, no opponent shall run into or rough the kicker or the holder of a place kick (A.R. 9-1-16-I, III and VI). 1. Roughing is a live-ball personal foul that endangers the kicker or holder. 2. Running into the kicker or holder is a live-ball foul that occurs when the kicker or holder is displaced from their kicking or holding position but is not roughed (A.R. 9-1-16-II). 3. Incidental contact with a kicker or holder is not a foul. 4. The kicker’s protection under this rule ends (a) when the kicker has had a reasonable time to regain their balance (A.R. 9-1-16-IV); (b) when the kicker carries or possesses the ball outside the tackle box (Rule 2-34) before kicking; or (c) when the kicker carries or possesses the ball more than five yards behind the kicker’s initial position at the snap from scrimmage kick formation.
  23. There are a few things going on in the play. First, the TE went in motion from the backfield to the line of scrimmage pretty quickly after the initial shift of players. There needed to be a second stop before he went into motion, otherwise it is considered part of the shift. Second, right as the TE was finishing moving forward, the wide receiver went in motion. Third, the wide receiver never comes to a complete stop and may have been moving slightly forward at the snap (very slightly). If the line wasn't set for a full second before the TE went into motion, the motion is considered part of the shift and then there needs to be a full second before the WR goes into motion otherwise that is also part of the shift and again the WR would need to be set a full second before the ball is snaped. Illegal shift. Even if the line was set for a full second (it wasn't), the WR and the TE are very close to moving at the same time, which would constitute a second shift and again require the wide receiver to stop for a full second before the ball is snapped. Illegal shift. And, if the WR were moving forward at the snap, everything else could be fine and it would still be an illegal shift. The call was pretty ticky tacky because everything was right on the line of potentially being legal. Here is a rule summary with video from the NFL addressing the same situation: https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-video-rulebook/illegal-shift/
×
×
  • Create New...