Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Yeah, I don't know. But it's part of the job, and he tried his best. Wish he displayed that much fire and urgency with the other (more important) aspects of being a HC this past season. 

 

 

28 minutes ago, DigglerontheHoof said:

As someone mentioned above, it's important to point out the absurdities of the playoff selection "process". 

It’s absurd and every time they trot someone out there to explain it. “Bama played a tough game at Auburn (uh what).” We get this crap as an explanation.
 

By Sunday morning the teams that know they are on the bubble aren’t likely to get in (W/L or SOS or head to head or none of the rivalry games fell the way that was needed.) not saying those teams would do this but I’m a chick I think this way: band together. Make one statement. Say the field should be expanded to 16. The teams on the bubble have their coaches out there in one statement saying they would be willing to play a buy in. Air it that morning. We are willing to play each other for a shot at the dance. While everyone is playing CCG games. Get it out to Fox Sports and ESPN so they can talk it up. 
 

I guess it’s better than seeing what we do each year. It’s a moment without hope. Coaches going out there explaining how absurd it is but they don’t get in. Force their hand. It never helps for the current year. Vandy won’t have another Pavia. Lost year. We are playing our peak football. Lost year, Miami fucking best ND head to head and it doesn’t matter. Miami still has to root for teams to win to still get in. Offer to play a game in their home stadium. 
 

I realize what I wrote is absurd but so is explanation from the committee and there is no oversight. Force their hand and say hey fuckers do you want a badass CFP or not? We are willing to play each other to get in. 
 

listening to committee head talk about this shit is worse. And it’s oh well here’s a bowl game. Nah. Flip the script on them I guess until it’s 16 games with some rules that aren’t fucking subjective to this degree. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

Yeah... Sark making the case publicly forced the CFP committee to answer publicly for their decisions.  The CFP committee looks so bad right now because of those answers that no one cares that Sark looked a little whiny.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Guadaloopy said:

Yeah... Sark making the case publicly forced the CFP committee to answer publicly for their decisions.  The CFP committee looks so bad right now because of those answers that no one cares that Sark looked a little whiny.

The committee looks bad but this year is a lost year for the teams on the bubble that didn’t get in. We will never get that back. Every year there are two or three teams playing some damn good football that don’t get in. Lost year. Everyone sees the absurdity. But it doesn’t help the teams who don’t get in. Fucking committee. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...