Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

Total posnobe unless he’s too dumb to realize how it came off.  But this guy is always a victim.   Suing a school because he’s an alcoholic.  

For sure. The response should have been “PK is 1A and muschamp is 1B, Texas will significantly miss PK. He’s been amazing. I wish him the best. Muschamp is going to help us not miss a beat. He’s a high energy coach, a former HC who will take care of business. He fielded some elite defenses last time he wore the burnt orange, I’m excited for next season. Next question” 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Thatguy said:

Whoa now. I mean we all like PK but his side of the ball was just as much a problem THIS season. Sans OU, that Florida- Arkansas run was not good defense. It's not just about points scored, it's that you couldn't put the lid on teams when you needed to. It wasn't that long ago that 3rd and PK was a running joke. We were truly solid defensively for a single year, largely based on personnel. We weren't doing anything special schematically. 

Again, Champ hasn't been calling games for a good minute so things may not work out, but when he was here it was obvious that dudes understood their assignment, played fast, and aggressive. We played some exotics too with split field coverages. Mainly though, when it was time to man up and get after it we did. What it looks like is Sark wants someone he can give full autonomy to on their side of the ball and he can focus more on offense. Georgia has that with Mike Bobo.  

You and others continue to miss the point of the post. Go back, read mine then read yours.

The move had the exact desired effect. Sark gets to keep his shittastic GM and OL coach and everyone is talking about the defense which only went downhill when Akina was brought in. Who's decision was it to bring on Akina? That question is not really the point the point is we will get the exact same bullshit on offense we have and there was zero indication or any evidence provided that Sark was putting energy into the defensive side. Thats the new narrative. 

I'm sure we'll continue to ignore the real issue in our discussions and continue to talk about Muschamp who was co-DC before he moved off. People keep forgetting that reality.

Advantage Sark and his ego. I'm done with the topic as the results vs OSU in the first game will tell the tale.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Ricky Butler said:

Not to get in an argument but you think Muschamp was put out to pasture?

 

Also, taking PK out of it, you don’t think Muschamp could give us a bump in portal and high school recruiting? He seems to be connected and has always brought energy in those areas. 

Well he was co-DC that quit to "spend time with his family". What's the reality, I'm sure I don't know but that's an extremely questionable reason to step down from being a co-DC and giving up all that money.

As for recruiting, there is a ton of pseudo science in that world. It might, but it might not. 

But ya missed the entire point of my post. This move has everyone talking about the Texas Defense when the OL, RZ, TOP and running game have been the biggest and most consistent issues for Sark during his entire tenure. 

Edited by BurntEyes
Posted
7 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

You and others continue to miss the point of the post. Go back, read mine then read yours.

The move had the exact desired effect. Sark gets to keep his shittastic GM and OL coach and everyone is talking about the defense which only went downhill when Akina was brought in. Who's decision was it to bring on Akina? That question is not really the point the point is we will get the exact same bullshit on offense we have and there was zero indication or any evidence provided that Sark was putting energy into the defensive side. Thats the new narrative. 

I'm sure we'll continue to ignore the real issue in our discussions and continue to talk about Muschamp who was co-DC before he moved off. People keep forgetting that reality.

Advantage Sark and his ego. I'm done with the topic as the results vs OSU in the first game will tell the tale.

I agree the offense isn’t where it should be. However, we didn’t lose in 2023 because of the offense. Last year the defense let a garden gnome rush for 200 yards on us. We let Klubnik throw for 336 on us. We’ve had 1 really good defensive season out of 4. Akina really has nothing to do with it. Offensively the we made the changes schematically that we needed to help Arch. The rest is bad interior Oline evals and not trying to upgrade them the entire time Majors was here. Both sides of the ball need to be addressed but no point in pulling our hair out over Sark calling plays, dude will take play calling to his grave. Take your wins where you can get them. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Thatguy said:

I agree the offense isn’t where it should be. However, we didn’t lose in 2023 because of the offense. Last year the defense let a garden gnome rush for 200 yards on us. We let Klubnik throw for 336 on us. We’ve had 1 really good defensive season out of 4. Akina really has nothing to do with it. Offensively the we made the changes schematically that we needed to help Arch. The rest is bad interior Oline evals and not trying to upgrade them the entire time Majors was here. Both sides of the ball need to be addressed but no point in pulling our hair out over Sark calling plays, dude will take play calling to his grave. Take your wins where you can get them. 

Oh, I know what's coming this season. Sark has made it clear his ego is what matters most, and that's never changing. 

I've accepted the reality that is Sark. I just don't like it. Hope I'm wrong but hope in one hand poop in the other. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Oh, I know what's coming this season. Sark has made it clear his ego is what matters most, and that's never changing. 

I've accepted the reality that is Sark. I just don't like it. Hope I'm wrong but hope in one hand poop in the other. 

Well Quinn was good enough to push through the bullshit. Arch appears to be able to cover for it too. In a different way but the same. We should be on the playoff next season warts and all. I feel your frustration my dude. 

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

 

But ya missed the entire point of my post. This move has everyone talking about the Texas Defense when the OL, RZ, TOP and running game have been the biggest and most consistent issues for Sark during his entire tenure. 

It’s the pretext I had a problem with. You misrepresented Muschamp’s reputation in order to make your point. Also, hires are not mutually exclusive so we could still improve the offensive staff. 

Edited by Ricky Butler
Edit
Posted
3 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

It’s the pretext I had a problem with. You misrepresented Muschamp’s reputation in order to make your point. Also, hires are not mutually exclusive so we could still improve the offensive staff. 

Ill wager whatever amount you're willing that no further changes are made to the offensive staff. 

And you WERE looking for an argument despite stating otherwise.

Posted
20 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

Ill wager whatever amount you're willing that no further changes are made to the offensive staff. 

And you WERE looking for an argument despite stating otherwise.

I wasn’t typing in all caps. I was typing in regular, measured tone. 
 

I have no idea about staff changes but I could see a world where WR and OL are changed. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Thatguy said:

Well Quinn was good enough to push through the bullshit. Arch appears to be able to cover for it too. In a different way but the same. We should be on the playoff next season warts and all. I feel your frustration my dude. 

I had a long response and it went 503 crash on me. 

So... tldr given our schedule we certainly should make the CFP and CCG. It's the results in those that concern me. 

17 minutes ago, Ricky Butler said:

I wasn’t typing in all caps. I was typing in regular, measured tone. 
 

I have no idea about staff changes but I could see a world where WR and OL are changed. 

This post made me laugh so, thanks.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...