Jump to content

DDD Dad

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    13486
  • Joined

Posts posted by DDD Dad

  1. 15 minutes ago, Dnaguy said:

     


    I doubt they do in the sense of what I’d consider ‘normal’ p in v sex.

    If he can sustain an erection as obesity has a significant effect on male sexual function, there is a large possibility that he has a buried penis that may not be large enough to protrude enough from his pains for penetration.

    Add to that the she’s dealing with the female equivalent, I doubt they bump uglies in the traditional sense as there’s just too much in the way to get in there so to speak.

    They’re likely nose blind to the smells that would stop a less hefty partner in their tracks even if they’re not facing the same anatomical hurdles. Corpulent individuals get accustomed to the odors emanating from folds / areas that are increasingly hard to keep clean. 
    Toys, mouths, fingers, hands, and stuff is the likeliest answer to your question.

    Username checks out?

    • Haha 2
  2. 41 minutes ago, sheeeit said:

    What is your point and what does anything you posted have to do with this case?  
     

    The ice/dea guys were perfectly within their rights to be at the courthouse and to take the defendant into custody. Do you deny this?

    The judge stopped the hearing in the middle of it without even telling the prosecutor what was going on and escorted the defendant and his attorney out of a side exit. She did this after she realized that the ice people were there to arrest him. That is a textbook violation of the statute.  We can certainly have a legitimate debate over whether it is a bad statute, but we cannot argue that she violated it. 
     

    You have actual attorneys on this thread advocating for killing people that followed the laws exactly as they are written on the books.  Statutes signed by Clinton with a dem controlled congress.   
     

     

     

    room something GIF

    • Haha 1
  3. 4 minutes ago, sheeeit said:

    Very interesting response to this situation.  Kind of a microcosm of so many issues under Trump.

    The situation is full of misinformation, no understanding of the law and no understanding of the history of the law.  Coupled with Trump's admin pursuing the law to levels generally, but not always, not pursued as aggressively.

    Considering administrative versus judicial warrants, administrative warrants are 100% enforceable by ICE and have been used to take illegal immigrants into custody by the millions under Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump and Biden.  Not one single court anywhere has ruled that administrative warrants for illegal immigrants are illegal or unconstitutional.

    The only real practical difference in the 2 types of warrants is that admin warrants have the caveat that they can not be served on private property and they do not, and this is a biggie in this case, REQUIRE cooperation from other law enforcement agencies or courts.  US state and Federal courthouses are absolutely public area and ICE is well within the law to arrest people there on admin warrants.

    However, while these warrants do not REQUIRE cooperation, it is absolutely against the law to actively try and subvert them.  100%.  The language in the statute is very clear.  From Twices post:

    "The third element that the government must prove to establish a section 1071 offense is that the defendant actually harbored or concealed the fugitive. The courts have uniformly held that 18 U.S.C. § 1071 does not prohibit all forms of aid to a fugitive. Instead, what is generally required to establish a violation is "any physical act of providing assistance, including food, and shelter, and other assistance to aid the prisoner in avoiding detection and apprehension." 

    The judge had no obligation to help in the arrest of the defendant.  She did not have to have her bailiff or other court officers turn the defendant over to ICE.  All she had to do was make whatever ruling they were working on in the case before her and then either let the defendant go or have him taken into custody for the crimes he was being accused of in the proceedings they were litigating.   Thats it.  

    The issue is that she absolutely knew that the defendant was going to be taken into custody once he left the courtroom.  She admits that knew this.  She openly challenged the ICE agents.  And I do not think openly challenging them is necessarily wrong and she doesn't deserve any punishment, imo, for challenging them.  However, because she knew that they were there and, unarguably, knew their intention to take the defendant into custody, by law, what she she absolutely could not do was violate the above statute.  I can see no argument that by actively escorting the defendant to a side exit- importantly in the middle of the actual hearing as opposed to after its conclusion to perhaps avoid a circus- that she "aided the prisoner in avoiding detection and APPREHENSION". It is not even a close call.  She absolutely aided the defendant in trying to help him avoid apprehension.  

    Should she have been arrested?  I don't know.  But there seems to be zero argument that she could under existing law be arrested because she did willfully violate the statute/law.  Again, whether the law is justified or rarely enforced or whatever is irrelevant.  It is the law as written.

     

    room something GIF

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
  4. 41 minutes ago, Pancho said:

    Kash arrested a Wisconsin judge this morning for interference of ICE agents?

    He tweeted it then deleted it.

     

    38 minutes ago, Jive Turkey said:

    sure, but that's not really the point, is it?  it's just the threat of being arrested that will deter people from assisting immigrants. a fucking judge got arrested. Joe Plumber isn't gonna stick his neck out. whether the charges actually stick is beside the point.

    Kash deleted the post but the arrest is real.

     

    Cross-posting from El Salvador gulag thread:

    A woman wearing a red blouse speaks into a microphone.

    F.B.I. Arrests Wisconsin Judge in Immigration Dispute

    (Free link below)

    F.B.I. agents arrested a county judge in Milwaukee on Friday, accusing her of shielding an immigrant from federal authorities.

  5. On 4/23/2025 at 12:02 AM, atomheartbevo said:

    Wow, did not expect Disney to show anal.

    Good thing I'm screening this before my middle-schooler watches it!

    Edit: Never mind, wrong show.

    Shiba Inu What GIF by BuzzFeed

    • Haha 3
  6. 10 hours ago, mdmost said:

    Went to Japanese Breakfast at South Side Ballroom. Quick show. She was done around 10:35. Already home. That's nice for my old ass. 

    Have to decide if I want to go to LCD Soundsystem on Saturday or Sunday. I saw them the last time they rolled through at the Bomb Factory. 

    I went to a concert last month at the Bomb Factory (my little brother runs Andy Grammer's tour) so, you know, close to home and all.

  7. 23 hours ago, Captainant said:

    Yeah, no, I'm not gonna start feeling optimistic until Abrego-Garcia is the first of many to actually receive substantive due process. The courts can huff and puff, but they're only ever heeded by the trumpist fascists when it suits them.

    Hell, even the goddamn nazis took great pains to stay within the bounds of their legal system. We are on uncharted waters and I couldn't agree more with the "we are native Americans negotiating with Andrew Jackson" sentiment.

    I think you meant to say procedural due process. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  8. 39 minutes ago, capnamerca said:

    Now there is chinese-made Fetanyl, being routed through Canada, destined for Texas? I can't keep up.

    Maybe Trump should slap tariffs on Texas for, you know, flooding the rest of the country with fentanyl. 

  9. 1 minute ago, Nivek said:

    That was the point.  Our corporate media continues to fall for Trumps bullshit and play his games.  They never question it and they don't really follow up with real commentary.  Why was Zelensky the only person not in a suit chastised?  Why did you claim to be able to solve the war in one day and now, 100 days later you have failed to live up to this promise.  How is your economic plan going to lower prices/inflation when it is doing the opposite?  Or did you just mean prices on the stock market and valuations of our economic interests?   How as stakeholders are we going to benefit from this?  How are you going to reign in the growing wealth inequality gap and government corruption where politicians are profiting from their positions and selling influence?  

     

     

    Rein

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  10. 21 hours ago, irishtexan said:

    Finally watched episode 2.

    Fuck Abby. I hated the character immediately. It’s also absurd that a bunch of extra military men would follow around a 4’11” girl who makes dumb-ass emotional decisions and doesn’t have a plan for anything. Ugh. She’s the worst. I hope she does a terrible death.

     

    21 hours ago, Slacks said:

    The whole episode was off.

    Helobious has two socks ???

×
×
  • Create New...