Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    10422
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by BurntEyes

  1. Those are all fronts for cartel money laundering via supposed ice cream sales. Look no further than the TCBY on MLK for supporting evidence. Yes, MS-31 Flavors and TCBY are both in on the grift.
  2. No, I dont have to make assumptions. I'm going off only the known facts at this point. As for intent, you and I covered this already about 3 pages back. But here we go again Texas Law: If you pull a knife out and thrust it in the direction of someone that qualifies for the intent to cause serious bodily injury. If that intent leads to their death it is murder by Texas law. Unless there is clear evidence of self defense which to this point I've seen zero (you've provided none) and him being in the tent and not attempting to leave further leans in the not self defense direction so does bringing a knife to a track meet. Also, his confession supports this as well. So your going against known facts, the actual law as it is written, a confession and all reasonable logic to ask your intent question. This is the second time we've covered this, you and I directly. You keep clutching at straws and provide zero links or support for any of your positions. It is pretty typical behavior for you.
  3. Your illogical attempts at semantics are amusing. Yes, room temperature IQ folks will conclude that if person a pulls a knife out on person B and person B ends up dead from a knife wound that c- person A was trying to stab person B. What an odd, illogical leap of faith with no ties to reality. You keep on reaching out there I'm sure spaghetti monsters, lochness and aliens are next on the possible reasons this occurred. I've noted in every.single.post.on.this.thread. that more evidence or facts may surface that alters my (and other people's) perception of the case, but given the information we currently have it definitely looks like murder. The statements of the suspect is a fairly decent reason to come to that conclusion. And before you go there, yes, I've already noted its not impossible it was coerced. So, am I not to believe the words of the person who, ya know, did the fucking stabbing?
  4. Fuck, using tapa talk and quoting should be a legal defense for stabbing someone in the heart. Edit - And it does under the Terroristic Threat aspect of capital murder A 3: TERRORISTIC THREAT. (a) A person commits an offense if he threatens to commit any offense involving violence to any person or property with intent to: (1) cause a reaction of any type to his threat by an official or volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies; (2) place any person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury; (3) prevent or interrupt the occupation or use of a building, room, place of assembly, place to which the public has access, place of employment or occupation, aircraft, automobile, or other form of conveyance, or other public place; This is nuance I might be missing reading and I'm happy to be corrected about the definition of Capital Murder. However, none of that alters: If you stab someone with a knife, and they die, its murder Unless there are other circumstances that occurred.
  5. She got any eligibility left?
  6. The premeditated aspect only comes into play on a murder charge as it relates to Capital Murder, which has a different legal standard than Murder. Again, unless he was attacked and defending himself, or some other yet unknown facts present themselves, if you stab someone with a knife, and they die, by Texas legal code, that's murder.
  7. Allowing a court case to proceed, getting a full grasp of all the details and evidence, and coming up with an opinion on what occurred after rather than jumping to conclusions immediately.... ain't nobody got time for that! I need to formulate my position on the topic with scant details, vague non-citied stories and whether or not there was access to sea bass.
  8. Yeah, the part about Illinois immediately raised my suspicion, but not prior to the lack of any sources on the story. I put as much faith in that as the lost visitor savior stories on Texags at this point.
  9. That's true, but if you dont use a bail bondsman you have to produce the entire amount.
  10. Bro, do you even murder? Ms Nicole killed the victim in the tent with a knife, but she's not a murderer. Also, Frisco has a grocery store that serves beer and I write with sincere regards most of the time. Not that the last aspect is a revelation to anyone. Regards, BE
  11. I didn't take medication for my mental illnesses, and no I'm not making light of them at all. A psychologist deemed me to be ADHD, truth is there were real, harsh underlying issues. Mom did NOT put me on meds. But I'm going to start blaming my "altitude issues" on them. For those not fond of subtly, I'm short. 5'8" This will help me get more women, I'm sure of it.
  12. Saw a comedian this past weekend. From that show I learned (sans research because) that synthetic urine is available at the bong stores. However, apparently, it can only be sold as a "kink" item and not a tool for overcoming drug test, allegedly. My point is, a question. Is synthetic urine an acceptable substitute for real urine as a viable option?
  13. Fair, its clear my perception was inaccurate. As for point 3, the second rule to solid self defense trainng is conflict avoidance, that comes after awareness. Avoidance can come in a lot of forms including de-escalation buy the easiest one is simply leaving the area where the trouble exists. You've every right NOT to leave, but more time than not it is the best choice and its poor self defense practice not to. You can never close that door once you cross a certain threshold and there's a good possibility it will alter the rest of your life if it goes to certain extremes. Your mileage may vary.
  14. I'm pretty sure this was a very crafty shell game concocted by the Town Lake Serial killer aka @Nicole44 Pretty sure she's back in the country and I'm sure there is sea bass and wine available in Frisco. She's not murderer though since there are no convictions, she's an artist.
  15. Go ahead and post the pics of all the serial killers and mass shooters who offed themselves before convictions too. They aren't murderers, they weren't convinced.
  16. Intent does not fucking matter. I covered this a couple of pages back but here is the Texas law. (2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual Unless the accused did not KNOW using a knife could cause serious bodily injury OR there are other factors we are yet unaware of that might point to self defense, based on Texas LAW... If you intentionally stab someone, and they die it is murder. Period.
  17. We are discussing it based on the facts we are currently aware of in the case. Based on what we currently know, it appears to be murder. Yes, that could change based on new evidence and we can discuss that new evidence when it surfaces. You can obviously choose to align the term of murder only to someone who has been convicted of the crime. However, be forewarned if that is how you decide to define it, you're a hypocrite if you define anyone as innocent who has yet to be acquitted of all charges they have been convicted of despite all evidence supporting their innocence. I think it pretty narrow minded to limit the use of a word based solely on what the courts decide via by a jury/judge/plead. In the purest definition, under legal aspects, it is accurate, but it is it very small minded and often inaccurate in the wider view of the world. Neither Hilter nor Stalin were convicted of war crimes... doesn't mean they were not War Criminals.
  18. UNLESS, there are extenuating circumstances which I am not currently aware exist, and fully admit may well exist, then the offender is a yet to be convicted murder. Will he be convicted, I don't know, but it seems likely that will happen or he will plead. Will evidence surface that changes my perception, I don't know, perhaps. To cap it all off, in the US one is innocent until proven guilty, so legally, he is not a murderer, but he sure looks like one based on all the current information available I specifically noted that there might be factors we are unaware of and made it clear that my own perception might change more than once. I also specifically referred to facts as we are aware of them. So, I'm not really clear why you felt compelled to reinforce something I had already point out in the post and in previous posts on the subject of murder/homicide under Texas law in this very thread.
  19. I can only go off information available, which I noted about 5 times. I also noted that more could surface to change my perspective 2 or 3 times. However, the person did confess, was it coerced? Dunno, wasn't there. No, none of us were there. None of us are in the Ukraine, none of us were there when people were deported or when Whitehouse policy discussions occurred either. Should we stop discussing what's occurring at any of those locations? What a silly strawman, you were not there, so you shouldn't form any opinions based on reporting available.
  20. This is semantics. Murder is a subset of homicide whose definition can vary by jurisdiction and country. This happened in Texas so: So now we have the definition of murder as defined by Texas law. Now, to be convicted of murder, under Texas laws, beyond a reasonable doubt is one way to define murder as a subset of homicide. However, to state that just because someone has yet to be convicted of a crime under specific state law mean they are not is well.. a dangerous game. There is absolutely a difference between a convicted murderer and a murderer. However, just because someone isn't convicted, legally, of murder does not mean they aren't a murderer. On the opposite side, just because some IS convicted of murder doesn't mean they are a murderer. Hell, just last page I got slammed when someone assumed I believed all people convicted of a crime are guilty, which I don't because they aren't. Similarly, not all murderers are convicted. Do YOU believe/think that there are people who aren't convicted of rape, child molestation or murder are rapists, child molesters or murders?? Would YOU say all people convicted of rape, child molestation or murder ARE rapists, child molesters or murderers? I don't know your answer, but here is mine. I think there are a lot on both sides of that equation. Innocent people who aren't guilty and guilty people who aren't in prison. Based on evidence I am aware of at this point, the offender has admitted to stabbing the victim. The victim died. That is, by definition of Texas law, murder, whether or not he has been convicted, if it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court, otherwise. UNLESS, there are extenuating circumstances which I am not currently aware exist, and fully admit may well exist, then the offender is a yet to be convicted murder. So, we can play semantics games, but using Texas law, based on everything I'm aware of to this point, the defendant appears to be a murder, just one who has yet to be convicted or plead. Will he be convicted, I don't know, but it seems likely that will happen or he will plead. Will evidence surface that changes my perception, I don't know, perhaps. To cap it all off, in the US one is innocent until proven guilty, so legally, he is not a murderer, but he sure looks like one based on all the current information available.
  21. And given the case, imo, this is a reasonable choice. Frankly, bail, last I checked is 10% non-refundable of the total. So, at $250k that's $25k they aren't getting back innocent or not and I'd wager there aren't a lot of folks that can afford to lose $25k before lawyer's fees. When it was $1m I'd argue that as unreasonable given the circumstances even though its a murder charge.
  22. Did you happen to be at the fair? Cause if so, you did, and we did some Kung Fu fighting while waiting in line for snacks and drinks.
×
×
  • Create New...