-
Posts
7056 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Thatguy
-
-
4 hours ago, Zeus said:
yep
pretty silly to bash Sark for a WR stinking early in the game
Either Wingo stinks or Moore stinks every game, we just can't seem to have both of them firing at the same time.
The QB power was not a great play call but damn every other play call in that break down we had the advantage.
Wingo is a multiple drop a game receiver. Moore is not. At some point you gotta understand that as a playcaller and stop putting him in those positions. I get you are trying to make sure he doesn't hit the portal for too little targets, but we are losing games betting on that dude. I'm about to put the next series up. Stay tuned.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:
It's racism right? If his name was Sheduer Smith and he was white this board would've gone crazy for him!! He had an iffy game 2 but nobody really commented then either.
I'll call it as I see it. Great game for Sheduer. He's showing some promise. He has this moxy about him on the field. Excited to see what happens next week
2 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:It's racism right? If his name was Sheduer Smith and he was white this board would've gone crazy for him!! He had an iffy game 2 but nobody really commented then either.
I'll call it as I see it. Great game for Sheduer. He's showing some promise. He has this moxy about him on the field. Excited to see what happens next week
First of all, I think you are missing which name needs to change to make your point.
I don't know if it's racism. I really don't. What I do know is this dude is not a 5th round pick. He threw about 4 balls in that game that most QBs don't throw. The out route to the TE with the DB draped all over him, the over the shoulder throw to Fannin up the sideline, and earlier one Fannin dropped was equally as good, and the throw to Jeudy up the seam were beautiful balls. All behind that offensive line. How the hell this dude fell that far down people's draft boards is beyond me. Gabriel couldn't make those throws if his life depended on it.
Anyway, let the masses here get back to shitting on him. I am sure a bad game is in his future. Lol
-
Just now, Slacks said:
4 TDs. He ran one.
My bad. I forgot.
-
Sure is quiet in this thread this week. I wonder why? *Checks news cycle and sees Shedeur goes 23/42 364 and 3 TDs*.
🤣😂
-
54 minutes ago, JesusSweatDuck said:
I'm curious to see how this develops through the rest of the game and how we did nothing with our run game outside of the first series
Exactly! The people upthread with something to say forgot how the rest of this game goes. We already called 75% of the runs in the game.
-
2
-
-
10 hours ago, Mdhorn said:
I wonder what Wisner's true thoughts were with this kind of erratic blocking? Did he trust any particular lineman to follow when his play was called, or just thinking survive or get crushed in the wash.
-
3
-
-
-
2 hours ago, Mdhorn said:
One of Wisner's moves that he excels at is hitting thin creases, and dodging solid hits, which makes him difficult to bring down when he's a solid target and there's no where to hide. When people talk about wiggle or being shifty, Tre has it. He's not fast, but can operate in a phone booth. I don't know that he's particularly explosive, but he is able to one cut and turn upfield. This is something Baxter lost, he doesn't have that extra gear or spring right before contact, or ability to cut and go. It's not just being able to run, it's fast twitch that just seems to be missing.
Tre is an excellent change of pace back, that gains as the game goes on and players wear down. This at times was also an indictment, because Sark would go away from plays there were working. Also, running takes time for backs to build a rhythm and settle into the game, which is difficult to do sporadically.
All 22 really shows that we are shit at blocking, and Tre is still finding a way to make chicken salad anyway. Amazing to watch the kid work. The way he sets up blocks and squirts through gaps that you didn't even see until he did it.
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, Horns99 said:
You should see him at little league footballBro. I don't doubt it. The Rogers go pretty hard in general. Funny family though.
-
1 hour ago, Slacks said:
Bowl practice is going to give someone a shot to move up in the spring practice order.
Every rep counts.
There is always a camera.
If I'm a freshman or sophomore OL that didn't get to play this season, I'm kicking everyone's ass that I can, because there are spots available and I'm taking one.
Hell, if I'm a QB, I'm kicking asses today, because Arch is a headshot away from potentially clocking out. Hell, let me bust ass enough to sit his ass down at halftime for this real football game, because in January, I'll be in a vest and not even have a shot to climb the chart.
I swear, man... Some of y'all have the fucking losingest, weakest, presumptuous, entitled mentality about Texas football.
Get up and win the next rep. I don't care if it's in shorts and tshirts... COMPETE.
The days of football will end for everyone, and most of us don't even realize, "that was the last play."
Embrace the game. If you love it, you won't turn your back on it.
10 years ago, we were 5-7 and didn't even get invited to play in a bowl game.
Texas vs Michigan in 24 days. Get your fucking mind right and stand the fuck up.
Big Dawg came in swinging his dick around. Love it! 100% correct too. Another thing people don't get is that young people getting reps in a bowl game because a starter sat might be the difference between them not portaling out.
-
4
-
-
Folks, this is Surly. We call each other out, disagree, and even call people pieces of shit here. Have at it. This is just my personal way I see things. You are more than welcome to pull the plays right from here and say how you see it. Even in this thread. I am all for it. We all can learn something. For example, I never played O-line. I can tell you what the play is calling for but I cannot go into detail about technique. What they are supposed to do with their feet and so on. The main thing I wanted to do here is show every play.
2nd Series-
Sark trots out the 12 personnel.
In a perfect world you would want to execute your entire playbook from the same personnel grouping. No defense would know what was coming. You could do everything from heavy run packages to 5 wide looks. I think Sark sits up at night jerking off to NFL clips of teams that can do that. That said your TEs need to be able to do three things. Block. Catch. Run. Last year we would run 12 with Juan Davis as the second TE. Just a body out there taking up space and pulls a would be receiver off the field. Until we have TWO tight ends that can both run, block, and catch I am not a fan of 12 personnel. But that's just me.
1) 1st and 10. We come out in 12 personnel with two receives to the boundary and both tight ends motion tight to the formation field side. Georgia counters with zone and 8 men in the box. We fake a zone run with Baxter and instead hand it to Wingo on a Jet sweep. In my OPINION, this is a terrible play for this set. Georgia is not a team to run sideways on in general, especially with an 8 man box. They are fast sideline to sideline and the more men you invite around the LOS the lower percentage chance of success. By the time Wingo clears the tackle box there are 4 Georgia defenders there vs just two blockers. Wingo runs right into the waiting arms of the force player and gets Jelani McDonald'ed, except with no flag because Georgia.
2) 2nd and 8. We fake the toss to Baxter with Washington as a lead blocker and try to get Wingo on a 9 route up the sideline. Georgia doesn't bit at all so Arch comes back to Baxter who is in the flat still with Washington out front. Washington gets a little piece of the DB coming downhill, which springs Baxter for a solid 7 yard gain. Good play design and use of everyone's skillsets.
3) 3rd and 2. This is a play where I criticize Sark. Some will say player execution, but you have to know who you are playing against and their tendencies. We are in 12 personnel, still, and going to attempt to run either play action or RPO. It's hard to tell because it's blown up so fast. Georgia has shown you in these situations that their edge guy is not going to pick or choose. He is simply going to fire straight at the mesh point and force you to do something quick. Then they will clean it up on the back end. We run the play like it's San Jose State, and the DE is going to freeze, which gives Campbell time to get there on the kickout block. A slow developing play on short yardage, blown up because we forgot who we were playing against. Punt.
On to the 3rd series.
-
8
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, SarkAfterDark said:
This response is still disingenuous. Wingo is boom or bust I can admit that. I can also admit taking him off the field likely makes us even worse on offense. Also Sark calls a play and the team has to execute it. Arch has numerous passing options on said play. He threw the ball to the guy that got open. I doubt very seriously Sark is telling Arch to throw the ball to Wingo in the headset.
It's a mesh concept specifically intended for Wingo, the number 1 receiver, to get open vs man. I don't disagree that Wingo has to be on the field. I do disagree to the amount of targets or us choosing him as the guy to go to in these gotta have it moments. In my opinion, this has to go to your hands guy. You are fully entitled to your own opinion though. I respect that.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, SarkAfterDark said:
So you get on your soapbox to call others out for pushing agendas just for you to turn around and do the same thing. We get it, everything is Sark’s fault, including a WR inexplicably tripping over his own feet on a play he has previously executed numerous times and in another instance dropping a routine catch.
When a player keeps dropping the ball and you keep putting him in crucial situations where you need a play, who's fault is that? Wingo has suspect hands and you keep going to him on 3rd and gotta have it. I am not one of those that wants Sark fired, but I am going to be critical of him.
Plenty more to go in this game so sit tight.
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, GTJ1982 said:
You really took it personal believing IT Film study has an agenda not to criticize Arch huh?
At the time when Arch was struggling I sure did. Look, everyone knows the O-line was a problem, but it wasn't the only problem. Any team can get to you with blitzes, but they leave themselves exposed in doing so. At some point you have to start punishing them for sending so many men, or vacating certain areas. We weren't doing that.
I am doing this game because people contacted me and said this is the one they wanted to see. You see, the cool thing about posting every play is that there really can be no argument. Anyone can pick 5 plays to say what they want them to say. You post all 65 and the story tells itself.
The Georgia game isn't a bad Arch game. This is well after Sark changed the offense to better fit Arch. This game is mostly about play-calling and poorly coached players failing to execute.
-
8
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:
Good play analysis.
You intro it, though, with criticism of Sark. Yet, for most of the plays, you praise Sark or blame player execution for the failure. This is, I believe, the only specific Sark problem you mention:
Sark, what formation or down is causing them to line up like this? Because if we can trigger it we can run on them. Georgia is far more difficult when they are attacking.
Of course, to one degree or another, player execution or lack thereof, is Sark's fault, as are the more systemic problems like OL and blocking scheme.
I'm sure there's more.
Twice, its the first drive bro! Plenty of plays to go.
-
2
-
-
@immamac my point s you have a receiver like that and you do absolutely nothing to get him the football? He was being single covered on the goal line, at least one ball of each of those series should've gone to him. Terrible play calling. Meanwhile Sark targets Wingo 100 times a game. Lol
-
1
-
-
Big balls there
-
1 minute ago, immamac said:
Driving hard and getting stopped by an elite defense?
Their offense is as basic as it gets. No excuse for that with their roster. No misdirection. Nothing.
-
1
-
-
For those of use constantly shitting on Sark's playcalling(me included). We could have whatever the fuck Ohio State is doing.
-
2
-
-
Their pass rush is gassed.
-
16 minutes ago, Okie State said:
I haven't really been following them at all. How the fuck did Indiana get good?
16 minutes ago, immamac said:NIL and a fucking baller coach.
Portal. Their whole team is portal transfers.
-
2
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, HenryJames said:
The guy covering Smith is 5'9" 170.
It doesn't matter who's covering Smith.
-
1
-
-
Smith is a fuckin monster!
-
2 minutes ago, Nicole44 said:
Paging @Thatguy
You know how that sets me off!!!!! 🤣
-
1
-
Sark's Georgia Problem: All 22 Film Study
in Football
Posted
Series 3-
So now we are down 14 points. First drive was solid, but we got away from ourselves the second. We need to get things settled down and put a drive together to give our defense a chance to get it figured out.
1) 1st and 10. Sark comes back to 11 personnel in a 2x2 set, and then motions Endries to get a block on a second level defender. We pull 54 to block the DE. Tre bounces it outside and 54 tugs the jersey a little too long. Holding.
2) 1st and 15. We come out with the exact same set and motion as the last play, including motioning Endries. Field side Moore and Wingo run a switch release. Endries releases up the seam carrying the corner. Then we send Wisner in the flat. The beauty of this play is it isolates Mosely, a receiver, on Georgia's linebacker. Mosely fakes a hitch, and the runs a quick shallow drag and Arch hits him. Beautiful play design and execution. Why we haven't seen more of this I am not sure. Huge gain.
3) 1st and 10. We come out in 11 personnel with three receivers to the boundary. Sark is nothing if not predictable in these situations. Sark and Arch are like two addicts in a relationship. Sark is itching to call the deep shot and Arch is itching to throw it. This ball should not have been thrown. The corner was on top of the route the entire time. Regardless, we give our guy a chance anyway. Ball is underthrown and inside. Wingo runs under it but it goes right through his hands. Sark has to save us from ourselves here. These are drive killers. Sure there are two checkdowns where we could've picked up a quick 5, but Arch is a big game hunter. If you call it he WILL throw it. Stop. Also, for those counting, that is two drops by Wingo thus far. We have to stop putting him in these positions. We've thrown enough of these to where we know the percentage of completing them to him is slim to none.
4) 2nd and 10. We come out in 12 personnel with both tight ends to the field in a TE and HB look. Boundary side receiver runs a comeback, field side a speed out, and both TE's run hitches. Washington is open. We hit him. He drops it. Just like he has many times before. Why are we making football hard? Just two plays ago you ran a play that got your receiver matched up against a LB. Run it back and see if you get the same look.
5) 3rd and 10 and we all know what's coming. We line up in 11 personnel, in a tight 2x2 set. Georgia spins down to a 5 man front. They are about to bring 6. Moore runs an out and Arch hits him a little out front but a totally catchable ball that Moore drops. If I were to be nitpicky, I'd like to see Arch take a little something off these throws. Punt
For those paying attention we have pretty much totally abandoned the running game. Also, I keep reading you can't blame Sark for lack of execution. You can when it's the same players over and over. Everyone is going to make mistakes, but at this point WE KNOW Wingo isn't going to come down with deep throws in traffic. We also know Washington has suspect hands.