Jump to content

Thatguy

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    6938
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Thatguy

  1. 1 minute ago, Vanilla Strange Gato said:

    Some of you are complaining about Sark’s wife and Belichek’s girlfriend being attention whores on social media, but in the same thread we are seeing people say “We need Lane Kiffin!!!”

     

    This was four hours (allegedly) before the Ole Miss/Georgia game. 

    IMG_1393.jpeg

    Yell for the people in the back. Lol. Let's replace Sark with Lane Coed Fucking Kiffin's bitchass. 

  2. 4 minutes ago, BurntEyes said:

    What's most frustrating is we didn't abandon the run, Sark just didn't put running the ball in his script. Mind blowing. 

    Some of us were of the thought Sark had a pitch count on Wisner and that's why the early part of the game was called the way it was. Sark's circle of trust is small, and I don't think he wants other dudes touching the ball. It's weird as hell but supported by him only running a select few receivers when he has highly touted ones on the bench. He is a weirdo about that. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  3. 36 minutes ago, Josef Pwag said:

    Our RBs had half the number of carries against Kentucky that they did against OU. Half. Did Sark suddenly discount the running game? Of course not. Kentucky stacked the box, so we attacked them where they were weak - our receivers in single coverage. Arch had the yips and couldn't function at a collegiate level. All of your profanity and ad hominem attacks don't change the truth. 

     Y'all need to listen to this man. Sark told you who he is as a playcaller and you aren't listening to what the coach is saying. @Josef Pwag isn't the enemy. He is telling you what the coach did and why he did it. If you disagree with this then send your complaints to Bellmont. Sark is a numbers dude and he will almost always take what the defense is giving him. Kentucky is primarily a zone team and they primarily played man to increase numbers in the run game. Again, I don't know why y'all are going after the poster. He is just telling you what happened. 

     

     

    • Hook 'Em 3
  4. 1 hour ago, Codaxx said:

    According to PFF Arch’s self-pressure rate is ~11%. That puts him in the 90th percentile for qualified QBs (that’s very good). As a reference Quinn was the 11th most self-pressured among qualified QBs last year. So most of Arch’s pressures are coming from poor protection 

    PFF doesn't count time holding the ball. Still have all the winning teams left on the schedule. Let's check back in a bit shall we? 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  5. 45 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

    absolutely stupid. Next level stupid. DE/DT stunt has 0 to do with a crossing route. Most of the pressure on the year is not from the 2nd or 3rd level. You are throwing all kind of BS in here. This is simple. A gap pressure is the best pressure in football. Full stop on any stupid rebuttal to that. It is the fastest pressure and it is immediately in the face of the QB. This is the reason the OL blocks inside out, because the that is where the biggest threat is. Defense brings 6 vs 5, they leave the outside guy for the Qb not the inside guy. You are only one in the history of football to argue that you should leave the DT unblocked on a pas play and focus on the CB coming. 

    Lol. You are moving the goalposts. I said that the reason they were attacking the way they were is because its ideal for mobile quarterbacks and Arch hasn't proven he can beat it. Of course you block inside out. Who is saying you shouldn't? weirdo! 

    Kentucky brought pressure and we didnt identify it and hurt them on the back end. So they continued doing it. You want it to stop get the ball out. Its as simple as that. 

    You guys did this same shit last year. When we couldn't run the ball it wasn't systemic issues we've had for years it was Quinn's fault. When Wingo wouldn't be physical and compete for the ball I was told it wasn't that Wingo was soft. No no no. It was Quinn's fault and we would see a different Wingo this year when Arch was behind center. 

    When I said last year Arch didnt see the field and was holding the ball too long I was told I didnt know what I was talking about and I would see this year how much better dude was. 

    Now here we go again. Discounting everything I say again as if I dont know ball. All you assholes were wrong and now you are scrambling to blame anything and anyone for this dudes shortcomings. The only person standing on business is @BurntOrange&White. Now you are flat put calling me dumb about how teams try to rush mobile quarterbacks when if you Google it you will get a return of plenty of highly paid people telling you the same thing. Honestly, im pretty tired of arguing with yall. Maybe I will just sit back and let the season play out and watch you guys scramble around and make more excuses. Especially when we play another team that doesn't have a strong pass rush and dude is still doing the same thing. You guys are exhausting. Dude is barely serviceable bro.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  6. 14 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

    Defenses have been getting pressure with 4 and with extra bodies. Kentucky was far and away the most aggressive, lets not pretend that is what Texas has been seeing all year. It is not rocket science, but for some reason you dont understand it. You think attacking the left guard is about Arch and not the abortion at LG and Center. If you get a guy coming through A gap the mobility of the QB does not matter. It is the best pressure in football. Your side bar into you want pressure up the middle on mobile Qbs is just ridiculous. 

    Man what are you talking about? Wherever you bring pressure from you are vulnerable behind it. Same for how you bring pressure Codaxx. Everyone would bring pressure up the a gaps. Why dont they? Because that leaves vulnerable to simple shallow crossing routes that most quarterbacks would eat you alive with. Slot receiver sees lb pressure and simply runs a 5 yard drag. You know, like the one we missed Wingo on. 

    That said, opposing defensive coordinators think like this. We have to try to keep Manning in the pocket but WE CANNOT allow him to escape to his right. He is a far superior passer when rolling right than left. So you remain super sound on your right. Maintain sound right side B and C gap rushes and get exotic in the left B and A gaps. They are sometimes rushing 4 but what those 4 are doing and where they are coming from is what matters. 

    If we had Ty Simpson as a quarterback you best believe they wouldn't be coming after him the way they are because he wouldn't be missing Wingo wide open on a shallow crosser. He would be breaking their backs and punishing them from bringing bodies from the middle of the field right where he can see them coming. 

    So yes, Brooks and whomever is at C are not playing great. But if you think that them being attacked isnt compounded by who the quarterback is and how they respond to that pressure then you are fooling yourself. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
  7. 1 minute ago, Hank Kingsley said:

    Which film are you talking about? The handful of drives vs. UGA when Quinn was benched or the 10 total TDs in the other 2.5 full games he played in? 

    He hasn't been under pressure all year Hank and he still has been the same. Or are you forgetting that? 

  8. 4 minutes ago, Lerka Lerka said:

    Yes. Hit him in stride and let’s see what the kid can do.

    Wingo is a generally low effort receiver. Year 3 and dude still has zero 50/50 ball catches. He loses every time. Arch thew him a perfectly winnable 50/50 ball that he made little effort on and luckily got bailed out cause the receiver didnt get his heard around. Go get the ball Wingo. 

  9. 24 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

    Attacking the interior gaps is the best way to disrupt any offense. Has 0 to do with mobility. There is a huge difference between succeeding and trying. Texas replaced one of the best pass blocking guards in the nation with worn-down speed bump. Center is not quite as dramatic, but still a massive downgrade. You are being willfully ignorant. 

    Dude. Attacking the interior gaps while not rushing past quarterback depth so they dont escape out the sides is and has been standard operating procedure for running quarterbacks all our lives. The LG and the C suck but their numbers are even worse because thats where our opponents are sending the extra bodies. Every opponent from here on out is going to try and keep Arch in the pocket. As they should. Its not rocket science. 

  10. 4 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

    100%. Its no different than a secondary with 2 all-Americans and 2 terrible players. The offense is going to attack the weak links, the defense will do the same. Kentucky hunted Brooks and Robertson. 

    Attacking the interior gaps vs a highly mobile QB is pretty standard operating procedure. They would've done the same last year too. 

  11. 2 minutes ago, Hank Kingsley said:

    This is a dogshit fastball at Wingo’s feet: Arch is 100% to blame for this incompletion. The ball is the speck on the 35 yard line, right before it hits the turf. 
     

    My sincere question; Is it too much to ask Wingo to get down and at least attempt to catch it? It was high velocity, would need to be a quick reaction. 
     

    IMG_6611.thumb.jpeg.af06b24bc4bab442ff7590d4cb5c387d.jpeg


     


     

     

    I personally think Wingo is pretty trash and wish we would stop targeting him as much. Said the same last year. 

×
×
  • Create New...