-
Posts
7014 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Foosters
-
-
1 minute ago, TwiceHorn said:
But vape liquids mostly produce water vapor, with nicotine or THC and flavoring.
Is that right? Because the THC stuff is a pretty thick oil, and I'm just imagining my lungs looking kinda like my oven range hood after a couple of months of cooking...
-
Actual non-gotcha question for @Sawbonz
As someone who occasionally vapes THC, my understanding was that it is believed to be safer than leaf combustion (cigarette or joint) but that most of the health concerns come from the unknowns that are present due to lack of studies? Is that fair?
I prefer edibles and have a dry-herb vape that I'm far more comfortable using than the oil, although it is not near as convenient.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, mdmost said:
Nah, she's one of the "good ones".Â
there are no "good ones," according to MAGA
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Sawbonz said:
So in your opinion, we should be able to buy asbestos sandwiches?
In your opinion, should alcohol be banned?
-
Quote
SACRAMENTO â Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that President Trumpâs decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles amounted to costly political theater, saddling taxpayers with a nearly $120-million bill.
Newsomâs office said the newly revealed price tag was tallied from estimates provided by the California National Guard about costs incurred since June, when Trump sent more than 4,200 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles. That included $71 million for food and other basic necessities, $37 million in payroll, $4 million in logistic supplies, $3.5 million in travel and $1.5 million in demobilization costs, Newsomâs office said.
Most of the soldiers were sent home in August, although 300 remain in Los Angeles.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-09-04/120-million-price-tag-guard-deployment
-
44 minutes ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:
@Thetexashammer out there crying about the free speech rights of literal Nazis in Germany, and silent on this stuff.
-
2
-
6
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
*hey, does anyone want to argue FOR the Nazis?
TheTexasHammer: "did someone say my name?"
-
1
-
3
-
8
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:Yep. Tell one of them you're going toÂ
London: "don't ride the tube or buses! The terrorists are blowing those up all the time!"
Paris: "most of the city is a no-go zone! Muslims are assaulting and raping people in the streets! And all the terrorists, it's just so dangerous!"
Sweden: "the whole country has been taken over by muslims! It's a no-go zone!"
Many US cities: "so many murders there! Are you sure you want to go to [NYC, Philly, Chicago, Minneapolis, DC, Boston, etc. etc. etc. etc.]?"
Just live their lives in freaking terror, about everything.
The best part is the talking heads that feed them this info live in LA and NYC, and vacation in London in Paris. Making millions feeding fear to the sheep.
-
10
-
if you didn't want to kill yourself for being in the Big XII before...
-
2
-
3
-
1
-
2
-
-
-
"if there's evidence, I want to see it."
*Trump goes after anyone trying to release the evidence.
"Guess there's no evidence. Libs foiled again."
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, Hitch said:
Lmao. AKA we made some shit upÂ
Â
Â
-
2
-
6
-
-
I think Hinch's thing is that he's ok with Trump being a rapist and serial sexual assaulter, but since there's never been a finding of guilt by a court regarding his proclivity for fucking children, he's still gonna support him.Â
You just have to hope to god he doesn't have a daughter.
-
LMAO at the pedo defender
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, nnm said:
He was quite a bit more accurate than he was vs. air over the summer.Â
-
2
-
-
Just now, royiv said:
I donât feel safe with the US military occupying the city I live in.Â
but you're an "enemy of the state" and a "traitor" as the US president has repeatedly stated. why would they care about you?
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:Â
Which party has majority control of these cities (in some cases for decades)?
Â
Â
3 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:Â
Which party has majority control of these cities (in some cases for decades)?
Â
Should the US military be policing streets and setting up traffic checkpoints in Dallas? yes or no.
Just now, Hitch said:People like feeling safe. This is a losing issue for you guys unfortunately.Â
"Standing up for the constitution is a losing issue."
A Trump supporter in 2025
-
9
-
4
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Hi, I'm a conservative American and I believe that the US Military should be setting up traffic checkpoints on streets in every American city. I am a serious person.
-
12
-
3
-
3
-
1
-
For those conservatives who still believe that the law should be upheld (lol)
QuoteIndeed, Task Force 51 troopsâ conduct clearly qualifies as Posse Comitatus Act violations under the tests that courts use to apply the Act. Defendantsâ presence to bolster DHS and DEA operations and shows of force exercises regulatory, proscriptive, and compulsory power on the surrounding public, and their participation in operations in numbers that match or outnumber law enforcement agents pervade the activities of those civilian agents
This was intentionalâDefendants instigated a months-long deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles for the purpose of establishing a military presence there and enforcing federal law. Such conduct is a serious violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. In fact, these violations were part of a top-down, systemic effort by Defendants to use military troops to execute various sectors of federal law (the drug laws and the immigration laws at least) across hundreds of miles and over the course of several monthsâand counting. The instructions to train Task Force 51 on the purported constitutional exception and thereby excuse unlawful military conduct came âall the way from the topâ of the Department of Defense. And as Major General Sherman testified at trial, federal law enforcement agencies âalways wanted military there, and we had plenty of capacity to do that.âÂ
Accordingly, Secretary Hegseth himself ordered troops to MacArthur Park as a âshow of presenceâ and to âdemonstrat[e] federal reach and presence.â Troops drove over a hundred miles to Mecca, where they significantly outnumbered federal law enforcement agents, to support a drug enforcement operation. Troops also drove nearly a hundred miles in a different direction to Carpinteria to set up traffic control points so that federal law enforcement agents could more efficiently execute their search warrant of a cannabis farm. That sets this case apart from others where courts have so far addressed the Posse Comitatus Act. Those cases involve military actions that are both passive and isolated in nature. See, e.g., Yunis, 924 F.2d at 1094 (Navy âhousing, transporting, and caring for [a criminal defendant] while he was in the custody of the FBIâ not a Posse Comitatus Act violation); Kahn, 35 F.3d at 432 (Navy provision of ships and backup support during a single search of a ship transporting illegal drugs not a Posse Comitatus Act violation); Hartley, 796 F.2d at 115 (Air Force communication of information regarding an unidentified aircraft entering the country not a Posse Comitatus Act violation); Bacon, 851 F.2d at 1313 (participation by a single army officer in a drug investigation not âaggravated or repeated,â and thus not a Posse Comitatus Act violation).
Where military conduct is more coordinated and systemic, by contrast, courts have found Posse Comitatus Act violations. E.g., Dreyer, 804 F.3d at 1275â76 (NCIS investigation was âsystemicâ and thus violated Posse Comitatus Act); see also Bissonette, 776 F.2d at 1385 (ten-week-long occupation at Wounded Knee violated the Posse Comitatus Act). Yet another departure from those prior cases is Defendantsâ complete sidelining of state and local authorities here. Even though multiple federal agencies and Task Force 51 rehearsed Operation Excalibur several times, they provided LAPD and LASD with a mere two hoursâ notice of the operation. Likewise, federal agencies notified local law enforcement of cannabis farm raids only at the time of the raids, not beforehand. This is not typical. In those Posse Comitatus Act cases where state and local law enforcement had jurisdiction (i.e., not cases like Kahn, which involved events in international waters), federal troops generally worked alongside state and local officials. See, e.g., Bacon, 851 F.2d at 1313 (Army investigator worked jointly with local sheriffâs office); Hartley, 796 F.2d at 113 (Customs and other non-military officials performed search based on not fall under such an exception.
Troops do not serve a protective function when they act as a force multiplier at a âshow of presenceâ (as in MacArthur Park), when they outnumber federal personnel by 100 at a remote location with a low risk of resistance (as in Mecca), or when they are deployed merely to speed up federal operations (as in Carpinteria). Defendantsâ lack of cooperation with their state and local counterparts raises red flags. It also highlights the lack of any showing by Defendants that state and local officials were unable or unwilling to execute the laws before Defendants deployed troops to engage in typical law enforcement functions.
Moreover, Defendants violated the Posse Comitatus Act willfully. Defendants knowingly contradicted their own training materials, which listed twelve functions that the Posse Comitatus Act bars the military from performing. They did so while refusing to meaningfully coordinate with state and local officials. And they âcoach[ed]â federal law enforcement agencies as to what language to use when submitting requests for assistance in an attempt to circumvent the Act. These actions demonstrate that Defendants knew that they were ordering troops to execute domestic law beyond their usual authority. Whether they believed that some constitutional or other exception applied does not matter; âignorance of the law is no excuse.â Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184, 195 (1998).25 Defendantsâ systemic use of Task Force 51 troops to execute domestic law in and around Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act.
-
6
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, Hitch said:
Iâm for it anywhere. I just find it funny to see Pritzker pulling a Baghdad Bob routine.Â
Fuck the Posse Comitatus Act, amirite.
So weird that yet another conservative is "all for" the US military being sent into American cities...
-
5
-
3
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Hitch said:
Hell, I think he could use the help based on the data Iâm reading.Â
so that's a yes; you think the US Military should be sent into cities to fight crime.
-
3
-
-
Just now, Hitch said:
No, his stance is that heâs got crime under control. Seems like he doesnât.Â
What's your stance? That a city with a crime rate outside the top 10 should have the military sent in to police it?Â
Should every city that has a higher murder rate than Chicago be subject to the same?
Â
-
3
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, Hitch said:
Well, Pritzker. But to be fair that was before this Labor Day rampage.Â
Ah, so Pritzker said that 9 killed and 52 wounded was not a big deal before it happened. What foresight!Â
-
2
-



Texas -- a failed state
in Cloak Room
Posted
well the unregulated ones which garbage put into them is a different issue, but even with those that are well-tested and regulated, I'm still concerned about inhaling a heated oil