I think you're really overreacting to what Klatt said quite a bit. Mack Leftwich was a good hire by Tech, and he runs a scheme that can be effective in CFB, but it's not some revolutionary scheme that takes all the best aspects of the three most popular forms of offense with none of the downsides. Basically every offense in CFB has Air Raid elements to it these days. He comes from a run n shoot background, which has a lot of similarity to the Briles offense. In general they will have 3 or 4 WRs and it's very much a spread out to run offense, like Briles. These offenses look amazing and unstoppable against overmatched competition who can't stop the run with a light box or struggle to account for the QB run, but they also get shut down pretty severely against better competition who can stop the run with a light box.
Tech had 10 points through 3 quarters with their starting QB in. Morton is a good, experienced college QB, and Tech's scheme wasn't doing much at all. If the reason for their success was this brilliant, revolutionary scheme, then they would've had more success through 3 quarters with their starter. Morton isn't a threat to run; Hammond is. This was more of the classic situation where a team didn't prepare for the QB run game and then the backup comes in and starts running and the defense isn't ready for it. Similar to how UGA had success moving the ball when Gunner Stockton came in against us in the championship game because we didn't prep for it and our defense did a poor job accounting for his mobility.
Tech is extremely high on Hammond, and it's possible he ends up being elite, but we'll see how he does when defenses gameplan for him. Either way, if the Tech scheme was the key to their success, they would've scored more than 10 points against Utah through 3 quarters.