Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Wasn't an easy play, but yeah, he can't throw.
  2. Have you watched the throws from our other outfielders? Everyone else would have had to hit a cut off man. 1-0 KY on a single up the middle.
  3. Yeah, been a bit of pattern. But usually even when we struggle to get hits, we work counts. Kentucky with a lead off double and fly ball deep to left that advances the runner.
  4. Yuck at that. Waste of a lead off walk. And we aren't making this pitcher work at all.
  5. Volantis barely works up a sweat. Horns win.
  6. Not good. Come on horns.
  7. Seriously. Most useless angle.
  8. Horrible fucking at bat.
  9. Don't fuck it up anymore.
  10. And he does well at?
  11. I already said this. The Supreme Court should not have taken the case. The judge's original order should have stood. Then we could have teed up what will end up being the actual issue. All this has done is create delay without deciding anything.
  12. And none of that is close to an actual remedy for the guy in prison in El Salvador. You're trust that such a remedy will appear is misplaced. That's been my point. It continues to be my point. And it continues to be true. SCOTUS already neutered 1 possible remedy. And it impliedly neutered the second with its most recent decision.
  13. What does that have to do with trusting? The market is volatile because of a lack of trust. An investor that trusts whatever we are going to do right now is a fool. Playing the volatility is definitely an aggressive play that conceptually I agree with. But, as you've indicated earlier in this thread, it is also straight gambling. Gamble away I say (especially if you're hedging like you say you're doing). Just do it with open eyes. The investor that is "trusting" isn't doing that.
  14. You know what they say about a fool and his money...
  15. And when they comply by saying we've reached out, El Salvador doesn't know where he is/isn't going to return him, nothing we can do?
  16. Shocker, non-answer. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/59/abrego-garcia-v-noem/
  17. Yup. Exactly my point.
  18. There was no reason to disturb the judge's original order. It just delayed getting him home/ the fight that is going to happen anyway. The lukewarm language was almost certainly to allow them to get it to 9-0. It doesn't actually require the government get him back. It just requires the government to maybe try, sort of. If the government does anything but get him back, you'll eventually have an order from the judge that requires them to take some concrete step that the government will deny based upon separation of powers. That's when the real fireworks will start. Again, celebrating this is way premature. Celebrate when the government actually gets him home.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...