Jump to content

bad_teammate

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    20,319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by bad_teammate

  1. 12 hours ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

    I always thought the whole purpose of freedom of speech was to let all sides express their opinions, then let the best arguments win over the hearts and minds of the public. As soon as you begin restricting some, it has the Streisand effect, as well as escalation... 

    How the FUCK are the KIDS of AMERICA supposed to know the PLEDGE if (((GOOGLE))) CENSORS our GOD?!!

    I mean, they are only forced to recite it every single day in school. lol fuck off

  2. - "Fucking Marxist assholes!" - Shouted at a group well-known for being Marxists... *checks notes* the American Indians 

    - "Get a job!" I shout at protesters, while I am also not at work.

    - "What the fuck is wrong with you people?" I shout at strangers being totally normal and not mad, "Get a grip!"

    - Blonde woman throwing up the L at American Indians and mouthing "losers". lol Andrew Jackson fucked your shit up!

    - "(((Who hired))) these people? This is ridiculous!" I say to the camera because people don't like being used as racist caricatures

    Maybe we SHOULD kill all white people?

  3. 4 hours ago, Brian Fantana said:

    Why don't you stop deflecting and admit what you said was bullshit?

    It's DixonHur. Even I've gotten tired of his profound dishonesty, and I'm basically an inexhaustible resource of inability-to-resist-trolls.

    He thinks and feels that minorities would be better off if we waited for the human condition to fix itself. Somehow "social and economic" pressures in Grand Saline, TX would have solved discrimination problems. Because... he thinks and feels it. No evidence. No historical precedent. Just... faith.

  4. 1 hour ago, tinhead said:

    29468827_1623586487689803_45455990645860

     

    If she can keep hers it'd be greatly appreciated

    Guns advertised like beer, because just about the same intellectual depth is required of the audience.

  5. 2 minutes ago, SmokeyBear1861 said:

    the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform

    Yes. I do not think it is immoral to purchase or own a semi-automatic weapon. 

  6. Quote

    You own semi-auto rifles, but think that they should be banned going forward?

    I advocate banning the sale, gifting, manufacture, import, export, and inheritance of all semi-automatic weapons. If that became law, I would follow it to the letter.

    Because I fucking hate the police (I even view the military with profound distrust and wariness), I absolutely do not advocate gun grabbing. My move of choice would be to focus on the manufacture and changing-of-hands aspect, not the ownership aspect. And I do not value business as I do private individuals so the idea of a gun shop being raided by the ATF doesn't bother me nearly as much as the idea of a private residence being raided by the ATF.

    Quote

    You won't destroy/turn in the weapons you have now. Instead, have a will to carry out your wishes?

    I would destroy them or turn them in if it became the law, yes. Just as I would expect of anyone else.

    Until that is the law, I will not do that. And I do not expect anyone else to.

    You should look up what "hypocrisy" means.

    Your (bad) argument is just like the one thrown at people who advocate raising taxes. "Well pay the fucking IRS more money if that's what you think! GOT 'EM!"

    Quote

    To me owning something that you think should be banned and keeping them until you pass(then getting rid of them) is hypocrisy.

    Where can I get a copy of the Brothahorn Dictionary Of Making Up Definitions Because I Feel Like It? Is it on Amazon?

    Quote

    If it was that bad, why would you wait until your passing?

    What do you mean by "that bad"?

    I trust myself and the methods by which I have secured my weapons. I am sure the vast majority of my fellow gun owners are just as responsible with them as I am, if not moreso. My advocacy for the policy outlined above is not out of fear of weapons themselves (of which you can see photographs in the Shag gun thread) or a belief that the weapons are inherently bad on their own or even a belief that most gun owners door a poor job.

    My advocacy for the policy outlined above is about society-wide issues that go beyond any single gun owner's fitness or quality. There are too many deadly weapons out there. We cannot go grab them without becoming a police state. But we can stop the flow of fresh supply and, over time, that will stem the tide of blood.

  7. Quote

    You're basically saying, "well they made a law, so they must have really thought about it hard, so let's use it."

    Not at all. I said my position was roughly like Canada's. There was no causational language in my statement (as there was with yours ("so")).

    I already stated my rationale. I will go ahead and re-state it below.

    My views on age of consent have entirely to do with power dynamics and how there are categories of people, either for biological or sociological reasons, that are power inequal to many others and cannot enter into consensual agreements or fair contracts. There are categories of people who, either for biological or sociological reasons, need the protection of the collective via popular act or legislation or other government intervention.

    Did you not see it or do you not understand it? I guess I can restate it in simpler terms if you need me to, just let me know.

    Quote

    It fucking says the words "regulate Commerce" among the several states...this isn't a broad interpretation...it's literally one of the specifically outlined constitutionally purposes of congress. 

    I agree it says the words "regulate Commerce".

    Here it is exactly:
    To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

    Is regulating the means of production of a good regulating commerce among the several states? Or is the regulation of commerce among the several states actually about the trade of goods itself?

    I know the argument can be made, because the Commerce Clause is used by very-much-not-Libertarians to grant extremely broad power to the federal government. I honestly am surprised, because Roberts' smacking down of the expansive use of the Commerce Clause in 2012 was widely celebrated by Libertarians. Your advocacy that Congress use the Commerce Clause to coerce private business into changing its labor practices is very bizarre and I have no idea why coercing them via economic manipulation is preferable to Congress just saying, "Nope, you're not allowed to do that anymore."

    I guess the idea is that the slave owners could resist Congress's economic manipulation and continue to enslave blacks at a higher price to the slave owners...which is... a better situation?

    Quote

    obviously I was being hyperbolic

    No, hyperbole is dramatic exaggeration. You were not exaggerating, you were creating something out of nothing. You were being dishonest, likely because you were embarrassed by me pointing out how stupid your argument was and wanted to get back at me by falsely accusing me of advocating the legalized rape of toddlers.

    But I ain't mad at you. Being a libertarian must be fucking torture when the asshole normies keep talking about how blacks should be protected from discrimination and oppression.

  8. 34 minutes ago, Vince_McCoy_Williams said:

    Problem is, this little triggered snowflake titty bitch has never touched a gun in his life, he would soil his pants if he did.

    The way you guys think shooting a gun indicates toughness is very pathetic.

  9. 44 minutes ago, Brothahorn said:

    In your case, enjoying the use of semi-automatic rifles, but now wanting to ban them. So that your son or my son does not have the same right/privilege. And it's not because they did anything wrong, but simply because you think, you know best.

    None of that is hypocrisy.

    18 minutes ago, Brothahorn said:

    So when are you going to turn in the semi auto weapons you own and practice what you preach?

    I don't advocate anyone just handing over their semi auto weapons unless they want to. I don't advocate any gun grabbing from private citizens at all.

  10. Just now, Brothahorn said:

    Say something worth arguing about and I'll clean your clock. Your Head Ding-Dong has a bad case of keyboard diarrhea. Along with being a hypocrite and no real dialogue(what you folks specialize in).

    Until then;
    8e89191d2c38167a01e604ccffd248d7.jpg

    What does the word "hypocrite" mean?

×
×
  • Create New...