-
Posts
20804 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by bad_teammate
-
-
Just now, Onboard 2.0 said:
Hey you've called me racist on several occasions and orthers when their points had jack to do with race as an issue, but you twisted it into those comments. I'm not the only one that's called you out on this tactic of yours.
If you've said something racist and I called you racist then that's fine. I doubt I've called you racist undeservedly. But you're whining never seems to stop. You fucking people act like the world is constantly oppressing you and no one even knows or cares who you are.
-
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
She was being pragmatic
Where is she? What has she done over the last year+ in the face of the worst president in the history of this nation? What causes has she championed? What enthusiasm has she worked to rally?
Where the fuck is abuelita?
She lost and couldn't even show up to talk to her supporters. She's pathetic. She's useless. Her disappearance is a blessing.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Onboard 2.0 said:
of course it doesn't because it contradicts your closely held belief system which is basically call anyone who disagrees with you a racist or a trumpkin.
You here and JBJ in the other thread. What is it with you people and pretending someone called you racist when no one did?
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
The difference between Hillary and Trump is their motivations. Hillary actually wanted to accomplish shit for the benefit of the United States.
Trump just wants to promote himself and not get punished by daddy Putin.
No. No she didn't. Hillary Clinton was and is complete garbage.
She has DISAPPEARED from any meaningful movement to help America. She could've come out a progressive firebrand and set the base on fire but she's dying in the woods. Meanwhile, Bernie is still out there bringing in thousands of people to rally around living wages, Medicare for all, and free college.
Hillary was never going to be anything other than a center-right, Mitt Romney president.
-
Bourdain was just peddling a different flavor of patronizing, patriarchal liberal bullshit that presumes that right-wingers and the rurals are feckless, emotional, incompetent pussies who can't take criticism or jokes. That may be a valid presumption, but it's way more insulting than, "Get your shit together you fucking rednecks." because at least that is built on the presumption that the rednecks can do better.
The fact that he killed himself recently doesn't make his both-sides bullshit any more rational.
RIP Tony
-
On 6/9/2018 at 2:56 PM, slorch said:
because I do not buy in on your bullshit politics?
No, because you're ignorant and hateful.
-
-
55 minutes ago, Tennesseehorn said:
Okay but that doesn't change the fact that you and your ilk still are hypocrites when it comes to bashing DJT but giving BHO a pass.
Obama was a war criminal and an ideological coward. He was nearly as cruel as Trump in his treatment of immigrant populations.
He was still 20x the president and 1000x the human being Trump is.
-
It's not "feel the burn Christians!!!". It's, "Slorch, you're an idiot and a terrible representative of your faith."
-
31 minutes ago, slorch said:
Homey suggested it's my job to correct their behavior, which it is, but not forever.
I didn't suggest anything. I quoted the Bible. It's a dirty trick, I know.
-
-
2 minutes ago, slorch said:
Why would all Christians be guilty of other people’s hate?
Am I my brother's keeper?
-
-
-
44 minutes ago, Mole said:
Everyone just sort of "evolved" on the issue.
Pronouns will basically be gone relatively soon and it will be a bloodless coup. I think the pace of the restructuring accelerates, in some cases, as we realize that all the prophecies of doom never seem to come to pass. It is interesting, because we see huge leaps but the essentially bigoted nature of man doesn't seem to be affected at all.
Interesting stuff.
-
Some way more reasonable and moderate tone posts from Christians than my fellow non-believers in this thread.
I get it, fellow atheist edgelords, but chill out.
-
Just now, DanRydell said:
So you started a thread for the purpose of accusing Democrats of obstructing Trump's executive nominees but you don't actually have any knowledge of what nominees have been obstructed or how?
Forget it Jake, it's TahoeHorn.
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, TahoeHorn said:
They cannot stop any. They can force all through a time-consuming process. And they do.
A District Judge that gets confirmed 95-0 isn't just brought to the floor for a vote. He's brought to the floor for speeches. Then, about a week later there is a vote to cut off debate. Then later there is a vote to confirm. There are about 40 that are ready to come to the floor today. Maybe 40 more will be ready soon. How many days of Senate time will it take just for 170 judges? How many for 335 Administration appointees? This week there were 3 judges and one appointee. If this is the way the Dems want to do it McConnell will have to start scheduling a lot of all day sessions with a bunch of votes. How many hours of Senate time should it take to vote through 40 judges that will pass with overwhelming majorities? Everybody knows almost to the exact number what the vote for each will be.
So your complaint is, basically, that we have a democratic process to check the power of the executive?
The barrier between a mainstream conservative and a fascist is as thin as tissue paper.
-
6 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:
The big difference between sexual orientation and non-belief is that the former can often be determined from behavior.
There are plenty of Muslims and Jews who make it very obvious by their dress that they do not believe in Jesus Christ as the savior.
But you're right about the assumption aspect, but that doesn't actually indicate anything meaningful because all a Christian baker would have to do is ask a series of simple questions of each customer to ascertain their righteousness. Why don't they? (I am not saying they should, but an objective look at actual behavior can tell us a LOT more about a person's beliefs than asking them.)
-
9 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:
Also, not believing is not a sin in my sincerely held beliefs. In many ways it might be better for one not to know my truths and be in “sin” as opposed to knowing the truth and sinning. That’s a whole different tangent however.
This is the problem with sorting through "conscience". I mean, non-belief is #1 on the Ten Commandments and is (arguably) the sole determinant of salvation. I'm not arguing against what you believe, I am happy for you to believe whatever, but
-
10 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
So you realize he's not talking about NRA members.
Baba Yaga is not... intellectually dexterous.
-
9 hours ago, Mole said:
I should have written their conscience. Basically, if a person's morals/ethics/whatever tells them they really shouldn't do something, I'm inclined to respect that and encourage it even if I would act personally differently. I see compelling people to act against what they think is right as bad for our culture. There are obviously many exceptions.
It does require an assumption of good faith on everyone's part. I have to respect that someone I disagree with isn't simply bad/evil/stupid/uneducated or even wrong; they just see things differently.
I get what you're saying, but understanding someone's "conscience" is vague and not helpful. It makes more sense to look at the results and impacts of actions and work from there.
15 minutes ago, OatmealRaisinCookie said:I guess I’m just stating the obvious which is that the two lifestyles and beliefs and existences are inherently opposed, in a world where both are held up to their ideals (Christian ideals of sanctimony and living as sinless as possible vs LGBT ideal of accepting their sexuality/biology/difference, not to mention the celebration thereof)
Here's the thing: Christians aren't doing that. Christians refusing service are extremely selective about which sins and sinners they want to discriminate against, and the criteria for that selectivity are not religious criteria. There is no fundamental difference between the sin of homosexuality and the sin of non-belief. The sin of non-belief is worse, if anything, yet how many Christians are refusing to serve non-Christians?
The criteria for anti-LGBT discrimination are socio-political, not religious.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:
So it was just the NRA and their supporters that he called sick fuckers and child murderers. So it's OK then. Never mind. This completely indemnifies him from any subsequent personal attacks.
Still not what he said, either. You're being purposefully dishonest because your arguments are shit.
-
48 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:
Is the little demagogue who referred to the NRA as child murderers, Dana Loesch as Disgusting, claiming Rubio was bribed by the NRA in exchange for students lives, and called republicans in general sick fuckers, and tried to ruin Laura Ingrams career upset now? Isn't that too bad...
No, he didn't.
And as far as I can tell, David Hogg (the one people know) isn't openly upset about any of the other kids constantly attacking him. He seems pretty focused on punching up and hasn't, as far as I can tell, responded to any of the other kids trying to make their names off of him.
Bourdain on the Red-Blue Divide
in Cloak Room
Posted
Someone might have said something mean to me 5 years ago I'm going to pout about it for fucking ever.