Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Atticus said:


The roster cost is part of our advantage. This is the era we play in.

It can get a hell of a lot worse. 

How do you think we pay for that roster advantage? I'm not saying he should or shouldn't be fired in that scenario, I'm saying I don't think the money would continue to back him, which means he would be gone. Are you under the impression that someone besides them would be making the call? 

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Reynolds Woodcock said:

If we fire a coach who follows up two straight top 4 finishes with 9-3 and 9-3, we deserve the 7-10 years in the desert that follow. 

Damn, what did the aggies do in their past life?

Edited by Daichee Bell
Posted
11 minutes ago, BlackCat said:

You're talking about millions of donor dollars being completely wasted on the Arch era if we miss the playoffs again. The conversation will be do we want to commit millions more to this guy or do we want to start this next cycle with a new name of our choosing? I don't see whats silly about that considering we are sitting at home this year watching a bunch of teams we would most likely beat. I'd bet we are top 3 preseason again next year. Sark would likely be toast in that scenario and I don't see what is silly about that.

The big money guys  that could force a move, are a lot more realistic than the morons on the football board.  It'll take a lot of 9-3 seasons before they start putting pressure on Sark.  They want good football and a respectable program.  I could see the team being Sarks best team next year and 9-3 isn't a bad season.  You've got OSU, OU, at Tennessee, at LSU, at TAMU...Who knows what Ole miss will be next year.

 

As long as the wheels don't come off somewhere or Sark doesn't get hit with a scandal he could go 7-5 next year and he won't be fired.  His seat will be awfully hot, but he won't get canned.

Posted
28 minutes ago, cmontexas said:

A key question to ask ourselves is, would we trade coaching staffs with A&M or OU? Absolutely not. Actually I think that list is pretty short

Indiana, Georgia (though with boom here now maybe just Kirby), tOSU, that’s probably it. Maybe Lanning but that assumes he’d be SECx3 here instead of Pac10 whatever. Who else? No one. 

as long as Sark stays dialed in he’s here as long as he wants to be. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, scramblyn said:

Indiana, Georgia (though with boom here now maybe just Kirby), tOSU, that’s probably it. Maybe Lanning but that assumes he’d be SECx3 here instead of Pac10 whatever. Who else? No one. 

as long as Sark stays dialed in he’s here as long as he wants to be. 

Some of the overreactions also take for granted the floor that Sark has established. I’m much more interested in him working on areas of weakness than wholesale change. I hope he diagnoses well. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Reynolds Woodcock said:

If we fire a coach who follows up two straight top 4 finishes with 9-3 and 9-3, we deserve the 7-10 years in the desert that follow. 

9-3 in a 9 game SEC conference schedule is not the same as 9-3 in B12 or the previous SEC.  
what we are going to witness next year is unprecedented in college football. Spread 8 more SEC losses around this year and things would have looked a lot different.  This is why there will be expansion to 16, no byes, first 2 rounds at home schools. 9-3 will be the new 10-2 imo. 

Edited by jdhorn92
Posted

Just a question and I’m not saying fire him one way or another but if we go 9-3/10-2 repeatedly and get bounced first round year after year after year when do you decide that isn’t good enough? Because after all we Sark has set the floor according to some of your arguments 

Posted
2 minutes ago, jdhorn92 said:

9-3 in a 9 game SEC conference schedule is not the same as 9-3 in B12 or the previous SEC.  
what we are going to witness next year is unprecedented in college football. Spread 8 more SEC losses around this year and things would have looked a lot different.  This is why there will be expansion to 16, no byes, first 2 rounds at home schools

I don’t think first two rounds will be at home. I think first will then it will go to all the BCS/CFP bowls 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...