I mean, when you say it like that, yeesh.
But he gave up 3rd most pressures and 4th most sacks as T last year... got to think he's very expensive swing tackle depth and Howard/Fisher remains the plan. No point in moving Tunsil if the backup plan is to outbid New England for that guy.
Then see if you can draft a OT who can beat out Howard/Fisher in camp and get a second guy at OG who can become the starter before year ends.
Maybe? Eek.
From everything I've ready I don't think any of the FAs we've signed will start. Going to need someone in house to be better under the new OC, and going to need to draft two guys who can play next year or sign a FA out there who will start.
At this point must take two of first four, and they both must hit and play year 1. One has to be a starter. Not ideal, but doable. It is still possible to get a starter as draft approaches, I have to imagine we're going to be actively after it, as Scenario A above is not ideal, but doable.
I know a business associate who I see quite a bit who went to Mississippi State and was quite thrilled years ago when they beat us for the national title. Can't talk shit yet but accepting all suggestions should we route the weekend.
He was a below average run blocker and led league in penalties. Second in league in pass pro.
Commanders must re-sign him to a top-10 deal after next year and hope he plays like it at 31 and older. I'm pretty surprised we didn't get more in the '25 draft, because we must now use new draft capital to trade up and/or draft a OT and a OG with two of first four picks and they both must hit and play in year 1. If not, we will be burning Stroud rookie clock. For that reason, I think we should've gotten more.
Risky trade by both sides, which is generally riskier for the team giving up capital for a player who must keep being that player. I hope Caserio and Ryans (and I guess new OC) have a plan to sign FAs and like what they see in the draft. Caserio & Ryan's have done well to this point so I'll give them the benefit.