Jump to content

Pato del Muerto

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    52272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by Pato del Muerto

  1. If it was over the plane, it would have touched the pylon. If it had touched the pylon, we would have seen it move in the overhead or seen the pylon cam image move. Since that didn’t happen, the ball was not over the portion of the plane in which the pylon existed. based on visual cues, the ball was never nearer the goal line plane than when it was near the pylon. So if it didn’t touch the pylon then, it couldn’t have compressed the plane previously in open space where a guess would have had to have been made. it’s ok to use middle school level science to mathematically prove it didn’t happen. instead we got…well there’s angles so we will just go with the on field call.
  2. Was he still tired of being alone?
  3. I still can’t believe the 2 point replay. I can’t believe the on-field call either, but mistakes get made. Upon replay, there was no shot that showed the ball breaking the plane. None. Zero evidence it happened. But for some reason the decision was that the official had a better angle than all of the cameras so we have to go with that. by that definition, it shouldn’t even be reviewable unless you put a camera right where you say it needs to be in order to overturn a call. Otherwise, every camera will have an angle and the SJ will obviously be to the millimeter right down the line to have a better view than all of them.
  4. Was she giving out dos if you swiped your money near her hand but not actually complete the transaction?
  5. That’s what I’ve never understood about the “you could call holding every play” thing. If you did, players would adjust, and then you couldn’t and wouldn’t. if “egregious” holding is all you want to call for game flow purposes then 1) change the rule and codify it as such, and 2) don’t ever call ticky tack or phantom holds since they obviously don’t meet your criterion of egregious.
  6. If they’d call it several times in a row, maybe they’d stop holding. Ignoring it encourages it.
  7. What about Ahmet and dweezil Zappa? adding Jason bonham and Nick collins. elle king’s dad is slightly more famous than jimmy jazz.
  8. When so much of your audience are unbridled buffoons, you are smart to employ people that think and communicate on that level. Saban isn’t talking to the same people that Desmond is.
  9. If the sec is working to get a 5th spot, their current choices are Texas, ou, and vandy. Texas has the head to head over both and the big tv draw but vandy has the easiest path to winning out and the plucky underdog story.
  10. I wouldn’t be surprised if the pollsters value a win in Knoxville more than a home win v vandy, even though vandy was ranked higher than Tennessee. Playoff committee will get it right though.
  11. Which is why those things aren’t being brought up as reasons but gambling is.
  12. If they’d recovered the onside kick, would you rather have had a 3 point lead or a 5 point lead?
  13. Apparently, to get it sponsored and make more money. “Here’s a shot from a few drives ago of the ball going by the goal line and you can kind of see Baxter catch the ball just in frame. We hadn’t said progressive the number of times stipulated in our contract, so there’s that.”
  14. Catch a break? Gosh how unlucky they are!
  15. A couple of you fellas on here have a lot of faith in IKF’s hitting for some reason.
  16. Check the basepath and you will notice fresh prints
  17. Guess yoshi can give them 3-4 more now then he has settled in. lol.
  18. This game is off the rails
  19. Harder still to fuck their brains out.
  20. Yttv needs to drop their rate accordingly if there’s no Disney owned stuff.
×
×
  • Create New...