Jump to content

BluTechsan

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    849
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BluTechsan

  1. That's a stupid argument but we let them get away with it. Leaving Georgia out altogether would also eliminate a rematch wouldn't it?
  2. that’s pretty much why they are 5, isn’t it? it’s absolutely hot garbage to have Cincy behind Georgia if they think ND is 5
  3. It’s the secsecsec starting points coming out of the gate. Get credit for early top25 wins even if defeated teams don’t end the year ranked because - secsecsec Get credit for early season loss because - secsecsec Get credit for late season loss because - secsecsec
  4. That was my thoughts as well. The mire I mixed and matched possible pairings the less I liked it. The question then becomes - is this just an off year? Are these bad matchups the exception or the rule?
  5. Like it or not, playoff expansion is on the table and 12 is the most recent # I've heard being thrown about. So, since we are playing *what if* and a reduction of games is desired, how's about this... Today there were 12 division winners that played. And since some seem to think that it was unfair that Georgia was matched against Bama. Let's chunk the conference championships and seed the 12 division winners. Today then would have been the first round and according to the last rankings, these would have been the matchups: 1 UGU vs 21 Houston 2 Mich vs 17 Utah 3 Bama vs 16 Wake 4 Cincy vs 15 Pitt 5 oSu vs 13 Iowa 9 Baylor vs 10 Oregon Having typed that out and now looking at it, I'm of the mind that that would suck too just like the 5-12 matchups above. Let's see what 8 teams would look like. We'll keep the CCGs intact and seed the playoffs as follows. Top 4 conf champions and next 4 highest ranked (subjectivity at play and rematches pretty much unavoidable) 1 Mich vs 8 oSu 2 Bama vs 7 tOSU 3 Cincy vs 6 ND 4 Baylor vs 5 UGA
  6. If they are a top4 seed they'd play 1 additional game that how it is currently structured
  7. Bama, Michigan, Baylor, Utah, Pitt Cincy, ND/BYU UGA/tOSU/ND/BYU
  8. Actually it *should* be the 4 best conference champions but it hasn't ever been that way so why start now That being said, UGA is not a champion but if they are top4, they should be 4th - screw the anti-rematch crap 1 - Bama 2 - Michigan 3 - Cincy 4 - Georgia
  9. Absolutely!! If there are auto-qualifiers there should also be auto-disqualifies 😀
  10. Yeah, we can throw UTSA out as they wouldn't get serious consideration. But I tried basing the rest off of the most recent rankings and who played this weekend and who didn't. I think BYU is the only team I bumped up that didn't play this weekend.
  11. But it would be a lot of fun wouldn't it? Today is 12/5. Semi finalists could be decided by 12/19 and played on NYD like they are now.
  12. I know. Was just throwing them a bone for the nice season. edit: swapped oSu for Ole Miss
  13. So the top 4 byes would be Bama, Michigan, UGA, Cincy What would the next 8 look like? I think I'd go with: 5 - Baylor 12 - UTSA 6 - ND 11 - Utah 7 - tOSU 10 - Pitt 8 - OSu 9 - BYU
  14. I'm not arguing that. I'm arguing that Bama's resume is better.
  15. UGA has more top25 wins but Cincy has mor top10
  16. Bama says hi
  17. I guess only Wolverines can be defensive Heisman contenders
  18. and yes that should have been targeting
  19. All these Iowa incompletions that Klatt is calling good coverage would have been completed by Baylor's QB and WRs today. I can't recall a game with that many well covered completions than what the Bears did today
  20. Non-stop chatter about Bama beating #1 but crickets about Baylor beating #5
  21. It shouldn't matter 1 iotta. What happened on the field during the season is all that should matter. And, I think Baylor's resume is better. Heck, so is Michigan's, oSu's, and tOSU's but ND will get the spot. So GO BLUE!!
  22. I hate to say it but Baylor's 11 wins and conf title are more impressive than Domer's 11 wins. But the Domers aren't getting passed over if Michigan gives away the 4th spot.
×
×
  • Create New...